Use this skill when you need a comprehensive VLM benchmark testing both perception and cognition abilities with yes/no questions. Avoid it when you need open-ended evaluation or have specific benchmark needs.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add feiyang-k/curation-bench --skill mme-a-comprehensive-evaluation-benchmark-for-multimodal-large-language-models-arxiv-2306-13394v2 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mme A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark For Multimodal Large Language Models Arxiv 2306 13394v2?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/feiyang-k-mme-a-comprehensive-evaluation-benchmark-for-multi)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
## One-line decision
Use this skill when you need a comprehensive VLM benchmark testing both perception and cognition abilities with yes/no questions. Avoid it when you need open-ended evaluation or have specific benchmark needs.
## Skill metadata
- **Skill type**: perception-cognition-evaluation
- **Paper kind**: operational-method
- **Actionability**: high
- **Evidence quality**: full_paper
## Goal
Create a comprehensive VLM evaluation benchmark testing 14 subtasks across perception (existence, count, position, color, poster, celebrity, scene, landmark, artwork, OCR) and cognition (commonsense reasoning, numerical calculation, text translation, code reasoning).
## Problem signature
- Modality: images with yes/no perception and cognition questions.
- Data state: evaluation images with binary yes/no questions across 14 subtasks.
- Scale regime: evaluation dataset across 14 subtasks.
- Model requirement: Any VLM for evaluation.
## Use when
- You need comprehensive perception and cognition evaluation.
- You want a simple yes/no evaluation format.
- You need a broad-coverage VLM benchmark.
## Do not use when
- You need open-ended evaluation.
- Yes/no format is too restrictive.
- You have specific task evaluation needs.
## Required inputs
- **evaluation_images**: Images for perception and cognition evaluation.
- **binary_questions**: Yes/no questions across 14 subtasks.
- **subtask_taxonomy**: Taxonomy of perception and cognition subtasks.
## Optional inputs
- **difficulty_levels**: Per-question difficulty levels.
## Outputs
- **mme_scores**: Perception and cognition scores per subtask.
- **total_score**: Combined perception + cognition total.
## Assumptions and prerequisites
- Yes/no questions provide a simple, unambiguous evaluation format.
- 14 subtasks cover the major perception and cognition capabilities.
- Combining perception and cognition gives a holistic assessment.
## Procedure
1. **Define subtask taxonomy**
Action: Create 14 subtasks spanning perception and cognition.
Why: Comprehensive coverage enables thorough evaluation.
Note: See paper for details.
2. **Create yes/no questions**
Action: Design binary questions for each subtask.
Why: Yes/no format enables automatic, unambiguous evaluation.
Note: See paper for details.
3. **Evaluate VLMs**
Action: Run VLMs on all subtasks and compute scores.
Why: Per-subtask scoring reveals specific capabilities.
Note: See paper for details.
4. **Compute aggregate scores**
Action: Sum perception and cognition subtask scores.
Why: Aggregate scores enable overall model comparison.
Note: See paper for details.
## Parameters to set
- **num_subtasks** — Role: Number of evaluation subtasks. How to set: 14 covering both perception and cognition. Default/range: 14. Effect: More subtasks provide broader coverage.
- **evaluation_format** — Role: Question format. How to set: Binary yes/no questions. Default/range: Yes/no. Effect: Simple format reduces evaluation noise.
## Validation checks
- Scores should correlate with model capability.
- Perception and cognition should be separately meaningful.
- The benchmark should be easy to administer.
## Failure modes
- Yes/no format may not capture nuanced understanding.
- Random guessing has 50% baseline.
- Some subtasks may have too few questions.
## Adaptation notes for VLM training
- MME provides quick comprehensive VLM evaluation.
- Use for rapid comparison during data curation experiments.
- Combine with more detailed benchmarks for thorough evaluation.
## Implementation notes
- Use the MME evaluation toolkit.
- Report perception and cognition scores separately.
- Compare against the MME leaderboard.
## Evidence from the paper
- MME evaluates VLMs across 14 subtasks covering perception and cognition.
- The yes/no format provides simple, unambiguous evaluation.
- MME has become one of the most widely used VLM benchmarks.
- Combined perception and cognition scores provide holistic assessment.
## Source paper
- **Title**: MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models
- **Year**: 2023
- **Venue**: arXiv
- **Paper ID**: arxiv-2306.13394v2
- **URL**: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13394v2
- **arXiv ID**: 2306.13394v2
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!