Generate structured documentation from codebases — architecture mapping, page writing, and onboarding guides. Use when asked to create a wiki, document a repo, generate onboarding docs, map architecture for documentation, or produce a documentation plan from source code.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill wiki-generation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Wiki Generation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fabioc-aloha-wiki-generation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: wiki-generation
description: "Generate structured documentation from codebases — architecture mapping, page writing, and onboarding guides. Use when asked to create a wiki, document a repo, generate onboarding docs, map architecture for documentation, or produce a documentation plan from source code."
lastReviewed: 2026-04-30
---
# Wiki Generation
Generate structured technical documentation from codebases. Three integrated capabilities: architecture mapping (plan the wiki), page writing (produce the content), and onboarding generation (new-contributor guides).
## When to Use
- User asks to "create a wiki", "document this repo", "generate docs"
- User wants onboarding documentation for new team members
- User needs a documentation plan or structure for an existing codebase
- User wants comprehensive technical deep-dives with source citations
## When NOT to Use
- Writing a single API reference (use `api-documentation`)
- Fixing existing documentation (use `doc-hygiene`)
- Creating diagrams only (use `markdown-mermaid`)
---
## Capability 1: Architecture Mapping
Generate a hierarchical documentation structure by analyzing the codebase.
### Procedure
1. **Scan** the repository file tree, README, and build files
2. **Detect** project type, languages, frameworks, architectural patterns
3. **Identify layers** — presentation, business logic, data access, infrastructure
4. **Generate catalogue** — hierarchical structure with section titles, scope, and source file references
### Output: Documentation Catalogue
```markdown
## Documentation Structure
### Getting Started
- Overview (README + architecture summary)
- Setup (build files, env requirements)
- Quick Reference (key commands, endpoints)
### Architecture
- System Overview (layer diagram, component map)
- [Component A] (per major module)
- [Component B]
- Data Flow (how data moves through the system)
### Onboarding
- Principal-Level Guide (architectural deep-dive)
- Zero-to-Hero Guide (contributor walkthrough)
```
### Constraints
- Max nesting depth: 4 levels
- Max 8 children per section
- Small repos (≤10 files): Getting Started only, skip Deep Dive
- Every section must reference specific source files
- Derive all titles from actual repository content — never use generic placeholders
---
## Capability 2: Page Writing
Generate rich technical documentation pages with source citations and diagrams.
### Depth Requirements (Non-Negotiable)
1. **Trace actual code paths** — do not guess from file names; read the implementation
2. **Every claim needs a source** — file path + function/class name
3. **Distinguish fact from inference** — if you read the code, say so; if inferring, mark it
4. **First principles** — explain WHY something exists before WHAT it does
5. **No hand-waving** — don't say "this likely handles..." — read the code or say "Unknown"
### Page Structure
```markdown
# [Component/Feature Name]
## Overview
Why this exists. What problem it solves. (1-2 paragraphs)
## Architecture
Mermaid diagram showing component relationships.
## Key Abstractions
The load-bearing interfaces and types.
## Data Flow
How data moves through this component (sequence diagram).
## Implementation Details
Non-obvious behaviors, algorithms, edge cases.
(Cite: `path/to/file.ts:functionName`)
## Error Handling
What can go wrong and how the system responds.
## References
- Source files cited in this page
- Related documentation
```
### Rules
- Minimum 2 Mermaid diagrams per page (architecture + flow)
- Minimum 5 different source files cited per page
- If evidence is missing: mark as `(Unknown — verify in path/to/check)`
- Use Markdown tables for APIs, configs, and component summaries
---
## Capability 3: Onboarding Generation
Generate two complementary onboarding documents for any codebase.
### Guide A: Principal-Level (Senior Engineers)
**Audience**: Staff+ engineers who need the "why" behind decisions.
Required sections:
1. **System Philosophy** — design principles, invariants, key choices
2. **Architecture Overview** — component map with Mermaid diagram
3. **Key Abstractions** — load-bearing interfaces everything depends on
4. **Decision Log** — major architectural decisions with context and trade-offs
5. **Dependency Rationale** — why each major dependency was chosen
6. **Data Flow** — how data moves (traced from code, not guessed)
7. **Failure Modes** — what breaks, how errors propagate, recovery patterns
8. **Performance Characteristics** — bottlenecks, hot paths, scaling limits
9. **Security Model** — auth, trust boundaries, data sensitivity
10. **Testing Strategy** — what's tested, what isn't, testing philosophy
11. **Known Technical Debt** — honest assessment of shortcuts and risks
### Guide B: Zero-to-Hero (New Contributors)
**Audience**: New contributors who need step-by-step practical guidance.
Required sections:
1. **What This Project Does** — 2-3 sentence elevator pitch
2. **Prerequisites** — tools, versions, accounts needed
3. **Environment Setup** — step-by-step with exact commands and expected output
4. **Project Structure** — annotated directory tree (what lives where and why)
5. **Your First Task** — end-to-end walkthrough of adding a simple feature
6. **Development Workflow** — branch strategy, commit conventions, PR process
7. **Running Tests** — how to run, what to test, how to add a test
8. **Debugging Guide** — common issues and how to diagnose them
9. **Code Patterns** — "If you want to add X, follow this pattern" templates
10. **Common Pitfalls** — mistakes every new contributor makes
11. **Glossary** — terms used in the codebase that aren't obvious
12. **Quick Reference Card** — cheat sheet of most-used commands and patterns
### Rules for Both Guides
- Every claim backed by `(file_path:line_number)` citation
- All code examples in the detected primary language
- Every setup command must be copy-pasteable with expected output
- Include Mermaid diagrams for architecture and workflow
---
## Language Detection
Scan repository for build files to determine primary language:
| Build File | Language |
| ---------- | -------- |
| `package.json` / `tsconfig.json` | TypeScript/JavaScript |
| `*.csproj` / `*.sln` | C# / .NET |
| `Cargo.toml` | Rust |
| `pyproject.toml` / `setup.py` | Python |
| `go.mod` | Go |
| `pom.xml` / `build.gradle` | Java |
Use the primary language for all code examples. When explaining complex patterns, optionally include a comparison in a familiar language.
---
## Error Handling
| Scenario | Action |
| -------- | ------ |
| Repository has no README | Generate catalogue from file structure alone |
| Language detection fails | Default to most common language by file count |
| Repo has fewer than 3 files | Produce minimal single-section documentation |
| Build/setup commands unclear | Mark with "verify" annotations |
| Cited file paths cannot be verified | Mark as `(Unknown — verify in path/to/check)` |
| Insufficient source files (<5) | Cite what's available and note the gap |
---
## Example Workflow
**User**: "Create wiki documentation for this project"
1. **Architecture Mapping** → scan repo, produce documentation catalogue
2. **User confirms** structure (or adjusts)
3. **Page Writing** → generate each section with citations and diagrams
4. **Onboarding** → produce Principal-Level and Zero-to-Hero guides
**Output**: Complete documentation set grounded in actual source code, not assumptions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!