Semver discipline for Alex_ACT_Edition — bump rules, breaking-change classification, fleet rollout sequencing
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill version-management --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Version Management?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/fabioc-aloha-version-management)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: version-management
description: "Semver discipline for Alex_ACT_Edition — bump rules, breaking-change classification, fleet rollout sequencing"
lastReviewed: 2026-01-01
---
# Version Management
> The Edition has a version. Heirs depend on it. Bumping it wrong breaks the fleet.
## When to Use
- Cutting a new release of `Alex_ACT_Edition` (template repo)
- Classifying an incoming PR as patch / minor / major
- Reviewing whether an Edition change is breaking for deployed heirs
- Coordinating a phased rollout when a major version ships
## Semver Rules for the ACT-Edition
The Edition is a **template** that heirs copy. The contract is therefore:
| Bump | What it means | Examples |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Patch** (`x.y.Z`) | Internal-only fixes; no heir-visible behavior change | typo in a SKILL.md, internal script refactor that produces identical output |
| **Minor** (`x.Y.0`) | Additive changes; heirs that ignore the new artifact still work | new skill, new instruction, new prompt, new optional config field |
| **Major** (`X.0.0`) | Breaking changes; heirs must update or stay pinned | renaming a skill, deleting a skill heirs reference, frontmatter schema change, mandatory new config field, behavior change of an existing skill |
### The "would a heir notice?" test
For every PR you're reviewing for release, ask: *if a heir is on the previous version and never updates, does this change break them?*
- **No, completely invisible** → patch
- **No, they just don't get the new thing** → minor
- **Yes, something they depend on is gone or changed** → major
## Breaking-Change Classification
Five categories of breaking change. All require a **major** bump:
| Category | Example | Required action |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Removal | Deleting a skill | Add to deprecation log, ship in N-1 with deprecation notice first |
| Rename | `feedback-triage` → `submission-triage` | Provide alias in N-1, remove alias in N+1 |
| Frontmatter schema | New required field on all SKILL.md | Migration script in release notes |
| Behavior change | Same skill name now does X instead of Y | Major bump only — do not silently change |
| Required config | New mandatory key in `.github/config/*.json` | Migration script + clear error if absent |
## Deprecation Protocol
Never delete in one release. Always two-step:
1. **Deprecate (minor bump)** — add `lifecycle: deprecated` to the artifact's frontmatter, add a `## Deprecated` section explaining the replacement, keep it functional. Add to `decisions/deprecations.md`.
2. **Remove (major bump)** — at least one full release later, delete the artifact. The major version signals heirs to update.
A heir running N-1 should always have a working brain. The only path to "this no longer works" is a deliberate major upgrade.
## Release Sequencing
For a major release with breaking changes:
1. Run `release-preflight` skill for mechanical gates
2. Run `coherence-audit` to verify Edition ↔ Mall consistency
3. Cut the release on Edition repo (tag, CHANGELOG, GitHub release)
4. Post fleet announcement (when fleet announcement infra exists)
5. Wait observation window (2 weeks for major, 1 week for minor)
6. Triage feedback that arrives in `feedback/inbox/`
For patch and minor: steps 1–3 only, no announcement, no observation window.
## Visible Markers
Every release decision records these in `decisions/curation-log.md`:
| Marker | When |
| --- | --- |
| `Bump: patch\|minor\|major` | Every release |
| `Breaks: <list of categories>` | Every major bump |
| `Deprecated: <list>` | Every minor that introduces deprecations |
| `Removed: <list>` | Every major that completes a deprecation |
## Anti-Patterns
| Anti-pattern | Correction |
| --- | --- |
| Silent rename to "improve discoverability" | Major bump with alias path |
| Patch bump that ships a new skill | Minor bump — additive but not invisible |
| Major bump for typo fix | Patch bump — heirs don't notice |
| One-shot deletion without deprecation step | Two-step: deprecate in N, remove in N+1 |
| Calling a behavior change "a fix" | Behavior changes are always major, regardless of intent |
## Falsifiability
This skill has failed if any of these occur within 90 days of any Edition release:
- A heir reports breakage from an N-1 → N upgrade we classified as patch or minor
- A removal lands without a deprecation notice in the prior release
- The curation-log lacks the required `Bump:` marker for any release
Track in `decisions/curation-log.md`. If two failures occur in 90 days, retire this skill and re-author from observed evidence.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!