Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Live Routine Reconciliation

ASecurity

starledger 的 canonical prompt fenced block 改動合併進 main 之後、懷疑 live executor 行為與 repo 契約不符、或需要手動觸發一輪 executor 時載入。這是 live Claude Routine 與 version-controlled prompt 的同步程序(含逐位元組驗證)。

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/4/2026
ai-agentsbashexpressapi

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/4/2026

$npx -y skills add F-e-u-e-r/opus-pack --skill live-routine-reconciliation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Live Routine Reconciliation?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Live Routine Reconciliation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/f-e-u-e-r-live-routine-reconciliation/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/f-e-u-e-r-live-routine-reconciliation)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: live-routine-reconciliation
description: starledger 的 canonical prompt fenced block 改動合併進 main 之後、懷疑 live executor 行為與 repo 契約不符、或需要手動觸發一輪 executor 時載入。這是 live Claude Routine 與 version-controlled prompt 的同步程序(含逐位元組驗證)。
---

# starledger:live routine reconciliation

(驗證日 2026-07-29/30——**外部服務行為,易變**:Anthropic routine 平台的 API 形狀與語義以
當日實測為準,再用前先小步重驗。routine 識別資訊來自 starledger 公開文件的 Identity 表。)

## 架構事實(為什麼需要這個程序)

- live routine(trigger `trig_01LGJsFiiqeBtc8rwAstqHVh`,hourly `17 * * * *` UTC,
  `persist_session: false` 每輪全新 checkout)執行的是 canonical prompt 的**副本**
  (`events[0].data.message.content`)。改了
  `docs/routines/starledger-ai-classification.md` 的 fenced block 並合併,**live 行為不變**,
  直到 reconcile——該檔案檔頭本身就要求「live routine must match this file」。
- 相對地,`docs/P3.2-executor-runbook.md`、`prompts/classify-agent-v1.md`、
  `docs/P3-ai-spec.md` 是 executor **每輪開跑時讀**的,repo 修正下一輪即生效。
- 教訓(2026-07-26 實測):merged 的 runbook 警語**不可靠地**覆蓋未 reconcile 的 live
  prompt——runtime 收口必須換 prompt 本體,不能指望執行器自行擇新棄舊。

## 程序(2026-07-26 與 07-29 兩次實測成功)

1. **抽 canonical**(從合併後的 main,機械抽取勿手抄):
   `sed -n '/^```text$/,/^```$/p' docs/routines/starledger-ai-classification.md | sed '1d;$d' > canonical.txt`
   +`shasum -a 256 canonical.txt`;重抽一次 `cmp` 確認抽取穩定。
2. **更新前記錄**:`RemoteTrigger get` 全文——記下 before `updated_at`、`cron_expression`、
   `enabled`、`events[0].data.uuid` 與整份 `session_context`。
   (`RemoteTrigger` 是 **owner 平台側**的 routine 管理能力,不是 starledger repo 的工具、
   repo 內零蹤跡;若你的會話沒有等效的 routine 管理工具,**就此停下向 owner 要**——不要找
   替代通道。)
3. **更新**:`RemoteTrigger update` **只送 `job_config`**——payload 形狀=把你在步驟 2 記錄
   的整個 `job_config` 物件原樣鏡射(`ccr.environment_id`、`ccr.events[0].data.*` 含
   `uuid`/`session_id`/`type`/`parent_tool_use_id`、`ccr.session_context`),**只**替換
   `events[0].data.message.content`;`name`/`cron_expression`/`enabled` **一概不送**
   (partial-update 語義:未送欄位不變,2026-07-26/29 兩次實測成立)。
4. **read-back**:fresh `get`,確認 after `updated_at` 已變、schedule/identity 欄位原值。
5. **逐位元組驗證**:把 read-back 的 content 轉錄成檔案,與 canonical.txt 做
   `cmp`+`shasum -a 256`。API 只回 JSON、無檔案下載——轉錄是唯一位元組化通道;其誠實性靠
   「兩次獨立 server 讀取(update 迴顯+fresh get)內容一致」+「與機械抽取的 canonical 檔
   cmp 相等」三角支撐。任一步失敗:立即停、報告、**不得宣稱 reconciliation 完成**。
6. **報告**:before/after `updated_at`、兩側 sha256、schedule 未變證據、一致性結論。

手動觸發一輪:`RemoteTrigger run`(回傳 session id;`last_fired_at` 隨之更新)。下一輪
scheduled 時間看 `next_run_at`。

**完成定義**:cmp IDENTICAL+兩側同 hash+schedule/identity 欄位逐一原值+(可觀察時)下一輪
run 的行為/報告符合新 prompt。

## 負例(本會話真實發生)

- ❌ circular 驗證:「把 canonical.txt `cp` 一份當 expected 再 cmp」——比的是自己跟自己,
  什麼都沒證明(當場自抓移除;驗證鏈必須含 server 側讀回的獨立轉錄)。
- ❌「merged 的 P3.2 每輪必讀,所以 live 舊 prompt 的行為已被收窄」——owner 校正:那只是
  額外的 repo 層警示,**不可靠**;在 reconcile 前,舊 live prompt 仍可能重演舊行為。

## 再驗證

```bash
# canonical 側(hash 與行數隨契約演進變動——記錄當下值供 before/after 對照)
sed -n '/^```text$/,/^```$/p' docs/routines/starledger-ai-classification.md | sed '1d;$d' | shasum -a 256
# live 側:RemoteTrigger get → 目測 updated_at 與 step 3 內容是否為當前契約(API 為外部服務,形狀先小步重驗)
```

Attribution

F-e-u-e-rF-e-u-e-r
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from F-e-u-e-r →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Terse caveman voice: answer first, fluff gone, every technical fact kept. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief", "less tokens". Stays on until "stop caveman" or "normal mode".

1100021 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

698621 votes

Writing Skills

Create and manage Claude Code skills in HASH repository following Anthropic best practices. Use when creating new skills, modifying skill-rules.json, understanding trigger patterns, working with hooks, debugging skill activation, or implementing progressive disclosure. Covers skill structure, YAML frontmatter, trigger types (keywords, intent patterns), UserPromptSubmit hook, and the 500-line rule. Includes validation and debugging with SKILL_DEBUG. Examples include rust-error-stack, cargo-dep...

3931 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3421 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Amp, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Grok Build, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

741 votes
View all in ai-agents →