Tri-model orchestration — run the same task through Claude + Codex + Gemini in parallel and synthesize the best answer. Use for high-stakes decisions where multi-model consensus reduces single-model bias.
Scanned 5/29/2026
npx -y skills add evolution-foundation/evo-nexus --skill dev-ccg --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Dev Ccg?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/evolution-foundation-dev-ccg)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: dev-ccg
description: Tri-model orchestration — run the same task through Claude + Codex + Gemini in parallel and synthesize the best answer. Use for high-stakes decisions where multi-model consensus reduces single-model bias.
---
# Dev CCG (Claude + Codex + Gemini)
Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer.
**EXPERIMENTAL.** Tri-model orchestration: run the same prompt through Claude, Codex (OpenAI Codex / GPT-Code), and Gemini in parallel, then synthesize the best answer.
> **Note:** This skill assumes external API access to Codex and Gemini, which may or may not be configured in EvoNexus. If only Claude is available, the skill degrades to single-model mode and warns the user.
## Use When
- High-stakes decision where single-model bias is a real concern
- Architectural choice where you want multiple LLMs' perspectives
- Code review where you want adversarial multi-model agreement
## Do Not Use When
- Routine work — single model is fine
- API access to Codex/Gemini is not configured
- The task requires real-time iteration (CCG is slow)
## Workflow
1. **Format the prompt** — make it model-agnostic (no Claude-specific syntax)
2. **Spawn in parallel:**
- Claude (current session, native)
- Codex (via OpenAI API, if configured)
- Gemini (via Google API, if configured)
3. **Collect responses**
4. **Synthesize:**
- Where do they agree? → high confidence
- Where do they disagree? → flag for human review
- Combine the strongest reasoning from each
5. Save to `workspace/development/research/[C]ccg-{topic}-{date}.md`
## Output
```markdown
## CCG Synthesis — {topic}
### Models Consulted
- ✅ Claude (Opus 4.6)
- ✅ Codex (gpt-code-X)
- ✅ Gemini (gemini-Y)
### Agreement Zones
- All three agree on: {points}
### Disagreement Zones
- Claude says X
- Codex says Y
- Gemini says Z
- → Flagged for human review
### Synthesized Answer
[Combined reasoning, marking uncertainty zones]
```
## Pairs With
- `@apex-architect` (for high-stakes architectural decisions)
- `@raven-critic` (for adversarial cross-validation)
## Configuration
If Codex/Gemini APIs are not configured, this skill warns:
> "CCG requires Codex and Gemini API access. Currently only Claude is available — falling back to single-model mode. Configure via `dev-mcp-setup` if needed."
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!