Before finishing any code (endpoint, query, migration, render, file, infra, dependency, test) — the senior pre-ship checklist of invisible cross-cutting controls AI omits, with backstop greps
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add event4u-app/agent-config --skill ai-code-blindspots --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ai Code Blindspots?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/event4u-app-ai-code-blindspots)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
model_tier: medium
name: ai-code-blindspots
description: "Before finishing any code (endpoint, query, migration, render, file, infra, dependency, test) — the senior pre-ship checklist of invisible cross-cutting controls AI omits, with backstop greps"
domain: quality
workspaces:
- engineering
packs:
- engineering-base
---
# ai-code-blindspots
AI writes the code the prompt literally asked for and stops. The controls a senior adds from unstated context — authorization, tenant scope, validation, transactions, encryption, rate limiting, output encoding, error handling, edge cases, package existence — are *invisible* to a single-file prompt, so they are the first thing dropped. They are also the classes pattern-linters miss. This skill is the pre-ship checklist: for the surface you just wrote, assert the matching control is present, run the backstop grep, and route to the deep skill when it needs more than a check.
This is a **routing + verification** layer — it does not re-teach what the deep skills own. It is the "did I supply the invisible controls?" gate that `senior-engineering-discipline` points at.
## When to use
- You have written (or are about to finish) an endpoint, query, migration, UI render, file/network op, infra resource, dependency change, or test — before you call it done.
- Reviewing an AI-authored diff and asking "what did it silently omit?".
- The `senior-engineering-discipline` rule fired and routed you here.
Do NOT use when: the change is prose/docs/config-only, or a one-line rename — there is no code surface to check.
## The Iron Law
```
FOR EVERY SURFACE YOU TOUCHED, NAME THE INVISIBLE CONTROL AND CONFIRM IT IS PRESENT.
"NOT MENTIONED IN THE PROMPT" IS EXACTLY WHY IT IS MISSING — CHECK IT ANYWAY.
A CONTROL DEFINED BUT NOT WIRED IS ABSENT. A grep IS CHEAPER THAN A BREACH.
```
## Procedure
1. **Inspect** the change and list the surfaces it touched (endpoint, query, migration, render, file/fetch, infra, dependency, test) — analyze what you actually wrote before checking it.
2. For each surface, take its row below: assert every listed invisible control is present (with file:line), and run the matching backstop grep.
3. For anything a grep flags or a check can't confirm, open the routed deep skill.
4. Emit the per-surface confirmation (Output format); surface any unresolved gap to the user — never silently omit.
## Surface → invisible controls → backstop
Run the row(s) for what you touched. The grep is a fast authoring-time backstop (not a substitute for reading the code); zero results is the pass, a hit is a prompt to look.
| Surface you wrote | Invisible controls to assert | Deep skill |
|---|---|---|
| **HTTP endpoint / route** | authorization (this principal may act on this resource — not just authenticated); tenant scope; **the three negative tests** (unauth→401, non-owner→403/404, cross-tenant→403/404); input validation at the boundary; rate limit actually wired; state-changing → CSRF + audit log | `broken-access-control`, `authz-review`, `threat-modeling` |
| **DB query / ORM** | parameterized, never string-built; tenant predicate present; no `SELECT *` across a serialization boundary; N+1 avoided (eager load) | `source-discovery`, `security` |
| **Migration** | reversible (`down`); expand-contract for drop/rename (never a bare `DROP COLUMN` before code stops reading it); transaction; index on new FK/filter column | `engineering-safety-floor`, `migration-architect` |
| **User-controlled render (FE)** | output-encoded; no `dangerouslySetInnerHTML`/`v-html`/`innerHTML`/`eval` on non-constant input; no secret/token in client code; token not in `localStorage` | `frontend-render-security` |
| **Third-party asset in shipped markup / CSS** | delivery is self-hosted through the project's own route (framework font/asset primitive, bundled package, or locally-served file) — a font/icon/stylesheet CDN link transmits the **visitor's IP** to that third party on every page view; a hotlink only on a stated consumer opt-in; `integrity` + `crossorigin` if a CDN link stays | `design-fidelity-mechanics` § Asset & imagery discipline (owner), `typography-system` |
| **File / outbound fetch** | path confined to an allowed base; SSRF allow-list + private-IP block on user-supplied URLs; size limit; **explicit timeout** (no unbounded/default-infinite wait); server-side validation (never client-only) | `security`, `defense-in-depth` |
| **Infra / IaC** | least-privilege (no `Action:*`/`Resource:*`); encryption at rest; no `0.0.0.0/0` to mgmt/DB ports; no hardcoded creds; scanner-verified, not `plan`-verified | `engineering-safety-floor`, `terraform`, `secrets-management` |
| **New dependency** | package exists on the real registry (not hallucinated); not typo-adjacent to a popular one; pinned + lockfile committed; CVE-scanned | `supply-chain-intake`, `dependency-upgrade` |
| **Secrets/credentials** | never a literal in source; env / secret-manager reference; password columns use bcrypt/argon2, never MD5/SHA; **agent/MCP config too** — no raw key in `.mcp.json` / agent-config / CI YAML / a committed `.env` (env-var indirection, gitignored) | `secrets-management`, `domain-safety-pii` |
| **Error path / timeout / retry** | failure handled, never silently swallowed (no empty `catch {}`); external call has a bounded timeout; retry is capped + backed-off + idempotent (no retry storm); the error surfaced to the caller carries no secret / stack / PII; a partial failure leaves consistent state (no half-written record) | `systematic-debugging`, `defense-in-depth` |
| **Concurrency / shared state** | check-then-act guarded (DB lock / atomic op / transaction — not a read-modify-write race); retried write carries an idempotency key; no unbounded parallel fan-out; shared mutable state synchronized | `source-discovery`, `security` |
| **Test** | asserts general behavior; expected derived from inputs/seeded data, not hardcoded; boundary + error + abuse cases, not only happy path | `testing-anti-patterns`, `test-driven-development` |
### Backstop greps (authoring-time, cross-stack)
```bash
# Frontend insecure render / client secrets (React + Vue + vanilla)
rg -n 'dangerouslySetInnerHTML|v-html|\.innerHTML\s*=|\beval\(|new Function\('
rg -n 'NEXT_PUBLIC_.*(SECRET|KEY|TOKEN)|VITE_.*(SECRET|KEY)|localStorage\.setItem\([^)]*[Tt]oken'
# String-built SQL (concatenation / interpolation into a query)
rg -n 'query\(.*(\+|\$\{|`).*\)|(SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE).*(\+|\$\{)'
# Hardcoded secrets / weak hashing
rg -n 'AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|sk_live_|AIza[0-9A-Za-z_\-]{35}|password\s*=\s*["\x27]|md5\(|sha1\(' .
# Infra: wildcard IAM / open ingress / disabled TLS
rg -n '"Action"\s*:\s*"\*"|"Resource"\s*:\s*"\*"|0\.0\.0\.0/0|InsecureSkipVerify|verify=false|curl.*\| *bash' .
# Raw secret in an agent/MCP/CI config (should be an env-var reference, not a literal)
rg -n '(sk_live_|sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|ghp_[0-9A-Za-z]{36}|AIza[0-9A-Za-z_\-]{35})' --glob '*.mcp.json' --glob '.mcp.json' --glob '*.env' --glob '**/agent*config*' --glob '.github/workflows/*'
# Swallowed error (empty catch) / unbounded external call (no timeout arg)
rg -n 'catch\s*\([^)]*\)\s*\{\s*\}|except[^:]*:\s*pass' .
```
Stack-specific patterns (the greps name several ecosystems side by side on purpose): keep the ones for the stack in front of you; a hit means read that line, not auto-fix.
## Output format
1. A one-line per-surface confirmation for the change, e.g. `endpoint: authz ✓ tenant-scope ✓ rate-limit wired ✓ validation ✓`, naming the file:line where each control lives (or `n/a — <reason>`).
2. The backstop grep(s) run for the touched surface(s), with their result (zero hits, or the hit + how it was resolved).
3. For any control that is genuinely out of scope, an explicit note saying so — never a silent omission.
## Gotcha
- **Defined-but-not-wired** is the signature AI failure: the rate-limit middleware or CSRF guard is *written* but never attached to the route. The check is "is it wired on THIS path?", not "does the code exist somewhere?".
- **Semantically-valid-but-ignored**: an IaC attribute that the provider silently ignores (a made-up `encrypted = true` on a resource that doesn't support it) *reads* as a present control but does nothing — a scanner catches it, a code read does not.
- A green grep is necessary, not sufficient — it proves the obvious anti-pattern is absent, not that the control is correct. Read the seam for anything security-sensitive.
- This checklist routes; it does not replace the deep skill. For an auth/billing/tenant/secret path, `security-sensitive-stop` still requires a threat pass *before* editing.
- **Run it per surface, not once at the end.** In a multi-file / agentic change the omission compounds — each new endpoint, query, or fetch is its own blind spot. Re-run the matching row when each surface lands, not as a single sweep after the whole feature is "done" (by then the missing control is buried under later diffs).
## Do NOT
- Do NOT treat "the prompt didn't ask for it" as a reason to omit a control — that is the exact blind spot.
- Do NOT mark a change done on a green happy-path test alone.
- Do NOT auto-rewrite a grep hit without reading it — some are intentional and belong in an allow-list with a reason.
- Do NOT duplicate the deep skills here — route to them.
## Auto-trigger keywords
- invisible controls
- ai code blindspots
- pre-ship checklist
- what did the AI omit
- cross-cutting controls
## See also
- [`senior-engineering-discipline`](../../rules/senior-engineering-discipline.md) — the anchor rule that routes here.
- [`frontend-render-security`](../frontend-render-security/SKILL.md), [`supply-chain-intake`](../supply-chain-intake/SKILL.md), [`testing-anti-patterns`](../testing-anti-patterns/SKILL.md).
- [`authz-review`](../authz-review/SKILL.md), [`threat-modeling`](../threat-modeling/SKILL.md), [`defense-in-depth`](../defense-in-depth/SKILL.md), [`source-discovery`](../source-discovery/SKILL.md), [`secrets-management`](../secrets-management/SKILL.md).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!