Use when authoring or modifying URDF/Xacro robot descriptions — modular macro structure, link/joint kinematics, inertia tensor calculation, Gazebo physics/material tags, and safety checks before running check_urdf.
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add enesbirlik/claude-code-robotics --skill urdf-xacro-builder --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Urdf Xacro Builder?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/enesbirlik-urdf-xacro-builder)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: urdf-xacro-builder
description: Use when authoring or modifying URDF/Xacro robot descriptions — modular macro structure, link/joint kinematics, inertia tensor calculation, Gazebo physics/material tags, and safety checks before running check_urdf.
---
# URDF / Xacro Robot Description Builder
Rules and templates for producing modular, physically valid, simulation-ready Xacro robot
descriptions.
## 1. Modular file structure
Never write one monolithic `.urdf` file. Split by concern and `xacro:include` them from a
single top-level entry point:
```
my_robot_description/
├── urdf/
│ ├── my_robot.urdf.xacro # top-level: includes everything below
│ ├── my_robot.materials.xacro # <material> color/texture definitions
│ ├── my_robot.core.xacro # base_link, chassis links/joints
│ ├── my_robot.wheels.xacro # xacro:macro for a wheel, instantiated per wheel
│ ├── my_robot.sensors.xacro # lidar/camera/imu links + <gazebo> sensor plugins
│ └── my_robot.gazebo.xacro # ros2_control + <gazebo> friction/plugin tags
└── meshes/
├── visual/
└── collision/ # simplified geometry, separate from visual meshes
```
```xml
<!-- my_robot.urdf.xacro -->
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<robot name="my_robot" xmlns:xacro="http://www.ros.org/wiki/xacro">
<xacro:include filename="$(find my_robot_description)/urdf/my_robot.materials.xacro"/>
<xacro:include filename="$(find my_robot_description)/urdf/my_robot.core.xacro"/>
<xacro:include filename="$(find my_robot_description)/urdf/my_robot.wheels.xacro"/>
<xacro:include filename="$(find my_robot_description)/urdf/my_robot.sensors.xacro"/>
<xacro:include filename="$(find my_robot_description)/urdf/my_robot.gazebo.xacro"/>
</robot>
```
Rules:
- One `<robot>` root tag, only in the top-level file — never in included fragments.
- Reusable structures (wheels, sensor mounts) are `xacro:macro` blocks parameterized by name
and pose, instantiated once per instance, never copy-pasted with renamed links.
- `xacro:property` for every numeric constant that's reused (wheel radius, chassis mass) —
never a duplicated magic number.
## 2. Link and joint kinematics
```xml
<xacro:macro name="wheel" params="prefix parent_link *origin">
<link name="${prefix}_wheel_link">
<visual>
<geometry><cylinder radius="${wheel_radius}" length="${wheel_width}"/></geometry>
<material name="black"/>
</visual>
<collision>
<geometry><cylinder radius="${wheel_radius}" length="${wheel_width}"/></geometry>
</collision>
<xacro:cylinder_inertia mass="${wheel_mass}" radius="${wheel_radius}" length="${wheel_width}"/>
</link>
<joint name="${prefix}_wheel_joint" type="continuous">
<parent link="${parent_link}"/>
<child link="${prefix}_wheel_link"/>
<xacro:insert_block name="origin"/>
<axis xyz="0 1 0"/>
<limit effort="10.0" velocity="20.0"/>
<dynamics damping="0.1" friction="0.05"/>
</joint>
</xacro:macro>
```
Rules:
- Exactly one root link in the whole tree (usually `base_link`, per REP 105) — URDF is a tree,
never a graph; a link with two parents will fail `check_urdf`.
- `base_link` itself should carry no visual/collision/inertial geometry when the robot has a
distinct `base_footprint` frame at ground level; otherwise `base_link` is the chassis and
does carry them. Pick one convention and apply it consistently across the whole robot.
- Every joint's `<axis>` follows the right-hand rule relative to its own frame, not the world
frame — a `continuous` wheel joint typically rotates about its local Y or X, not Z.
- `<origin xyz="..." rpy="...">` on every joint is relative to the **parent** link's frame.
Never omit it (an omitted origin silently defaults to zero, which is rarely what's intended
once a robot has more than a couple of links).
- Every non-fixed joint (`revolute`, `prismatic`) MUST have a `<limit>` with `lower`, `upper`,
`effort`, and `velocity`. `continuous` joints have no position limits but still need
`effort`/`velocity` — a missing velocity limit is a real safety gap once this URDF drives
`ros2_control` hardware.
- Give every moving joint `<dynamics damping="..." friction="...">` — omitting it makes physics
engines (and `ros2_control` simulated hardware) behave unrealistically stiff or unstable.
## 3. Inertia tensor calculation
Never leave `<inertial>` at placeholder/identity values — an incorrect or singular inertia
tensor is the single most common cause of an unstable or NaN-diverging Gazebo simulation.
Standard closed-form formulas (mass `m`, principal axes aligned with the link's local frame):
| Shape | Ixx | Iyy | Izz |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solid box (x,y,z dims) | `m(y²+z²)/12` | `m(x²+z²)/12` | `m(x²+y²)/12` |
| Solid cylinder (radius r, length h, axis = z) | `m(3r²+h²)/12` | `m(3r²+h²)/12` | `mr²/2` |
| Solid sphere (radius r) | `2mr²/5` | `2mr²/5` | `2mr²/5` |
Xacro macros to compute these directly so no author hand-calculates them:
```xml
<xacro:macro name="box_inertia" params="mass x y z">
<inertial>
<mass value="${mass}"/>
<inertia ixx="${mass*(y*y+z*z)/12}" ixy="0" ixz="0"
iyy="${mass*(x*x+z*z)/12}" iyz="0"
izz="${mass*(x*x+y*y)/12}"/>
</inertial>
</xacro:macro>
<xacro:macro name="cylinder_inertia" params="mass radius length">
<inertial>
<mass value="${mass}"/>
<inertia ixx="${mass*(3*radius*radius+length*length)/12}" ixy="0" ixz="0"
iyy="${mass*(3*radius*radius+length*length)/12}" iyz="0"
izz="${mass*radius*radius/2}"/>
</inertial>
</xacro:macro>
<xacro:macro name="sphere_inertia" params="mass radius">
<inertial>
<mass value="${mass}"/>
<inertia ixx="${2*mass*radius*radius/5}" ixy="0" ixz="0"
iyy="${2*mass*radius*radius/5}" iyz="0"
izz="${2*mass*radius*radius/5}"/>
</inertial>
</xacro:macro>
```
Rules (safety checks to apply before trusting an `<inertial>` block):
- `mass` > 0 always. A zero or negative mass is physically invalid and will produce NaNs in
simulation.
- `Ixx`, `Iyy`, `Izz` > 0 (positive-definite diagonal). A zero principal moment means the solver
treats that axis as having no rotational inertia at all.
- Triangle inequality on principal moments: `Ixx + Iyy >= Izz` (and both other permutations).
If it's violated, the geometry/mass combination is not physically realizable and usually
indicates a units mistake (e.g. dimensions in millimeters fed into a meter-based formula).
- For composite/irregular links (a chassis with mounted electronics), either approximate with
one dominant primitive shape's inertia or sum the parallel-axis-theorem-shifted inertias of
several primitives — never leave a complex link at a default/copied inertia from an unrelated
link.
## 4. Gazebo physics and material tags
```xml
<!-- my_robot.gazebo.xacro -->
<gazebo reference="${prefix}_wheel_link">
<mu1>1.0</mu1>
<mu2>1.0</mu2>
<material>Gazebo/Black</material>
</gazebo>
<gazebo reference="base_link">
<material>Gazebo/Grey</material>
</gazebo>
<ros2_control name="my_robot_system" type="system">
<hardware>
<plugin>gz_ros2_control/GazeboSimSystem</plugin>
</hardware>
<joint name="left_wheel_joint">
<command_interface name="velocity"/>
<state_interface name="velocity"/>
<state_interface name="position"/>
</joint>
<joint name="right_wheel_joint">
<command_interface name="velocity"/>
<state_interface name="velocity"/>
<state_interface name="position"/>
</joint>
</ros2_control>
<gazebo>
<plugin filename="gz_ros2_control-system" name="gz_ros2_control::GazeboSimROS2ControlPlugin">
<parameters>$(find my_robot_bringup)/config/controllers.yaml</parameters>
</plugin>
</gazebo>
```
Rules:
- Every `<gazebo reference="link_name">` must reference a link that actually exists in the
URDF — a typo here fails silently (Gazebo just ignores the unmatched tag) rather than raising
an error, so double-check names against the `<link>` definitions.
- Set friction (`mu1`/`mu2`) explicitly on any link that touches the ground (wheels, feet) —
the physics engine default is rarely appropriate for a wheeled or legged robot.
- Keep the `<ros2_control>` hardware plugin swappable: use `gz_ros2_control/GazeboSimSystem`
for simulation and a real hardware plugin (e.g. a custom `SystemInterface`) for the physical
robot, selected via a launch argument — never hardcode simulation-only tags in a file also
used on hardware.
- Collision geometry should be simplified primitives or a decimated mesh, never the full-detail
visual mesh — using the visual mesh as collision geometry is a common cause of extremely slow
or unstable physics stepping.
## 5. Pre-flight safety checks (before trusting the model)
Verify all of the following before considering a URDF/Xacro file done — this plugin's
`verify_urdf` hook automatically runs `xacro` + `check_urdf` on save, but these structural
checks go beyond what `check_urdf` catches:
1. Exactly one root link (no cycles, no disconnected sub-trees).
2. No duplicate `link` or `joint` names anywhere in the expanded URDF.
3. Every non-fixed joint has `<limit>` with sane `effort`/`velocity` (and `lower`/`upper` for
non-continuous types).
4. Every link with physical presence has `mass > 0` and a positive-definite inertia tensor
(see §3) — purely virtual/frame-only links (e.g. a `*_optical_frame` for a camera) may
validly omit `<inertial>`.
5. Collision geometry is simpler than visual geometry for every link with a mesh.
6. Run the actual tools before declaring success:
```bash
xacro my_robot.urdf.xacro -o /tmp/my_robot.urdf
check_urdf /tmp/my_robot.urdf
urdf_to_graphiz /tmp/my_robot.urdf # visualize the tree, spot unintended disconnections
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!