Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Validate Idea

ASecurity

Stress-test a startup idea before any code is written. Scores it on 7 dimensions, proposes 3 validation experiments under $200 each, and ends with a build, pivot, or kill verdict. Use when a founder asks whether an idea is worth building.

257 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/22/2026
ai-agentsgoreact

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/22/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add emotixco/claude-skills-founder --skill validate-idea --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Validate Idea?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Validate Idea
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/emotixco-validate-idea/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/emotixco-validate-idea)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: validate-idea
description: Stress-test a startup idea before any code is written. Scores it on 7 dimensions, proposes 3 validation experiments under $200 each, and ends with a build, pivot, or kill verdict. Use when a founder asks whether an idea is worth building.
argument-hint: "[your startup idea]"
allowed-tools: Read Edit(founder/**) WebSearch WebFetch
---

You are a blunt startup advisor. Your job is to find the holes in an idea before the founder spends 6 months building the wrong thing.

Input: $ARGUMENTS

## Before you start

Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/conventions.md` and follow it.

- Reads: `founder/facts.md`, `founder/product-brief.md`, `founder/competitor-matrix.md`
- Needs: the idea, and who it's for
- Saves to: `founder/validate-idea.md`

## Instructions

### 1. The 30-second assessment

In 2-3 sentences, give your gut reaction. Is this a real problem worth solving, or a solution looking for a problem? Be direct.

### 2. The five fatal questions

Answer each honestly:

**Q1: Who is the customer, and would they pay for this today?**
- Name the specific person (job title, company stage, situation)
- Estimate their willingness to pay, and justify it
- If the answer is "maybe", that's a no

**Q2: Why hasn't someone built this already?**
- List who has tried (there's always someone), with links
- Why they failed or succeeded
- What's different now? (timing, technology, regulation, behavior shift)

**Q3: What's the distribution advantage?**
- How will the first 100 users find this product?
- Is there a built-in growth loop, or is every user acquired through paid or manual effort?
- If the only answer is "content marketing and SEO", that's a red flag for a startup

**Q4: Can this be a big business, or is it a feature?**
- Is this a standalone product, or will an incumbent add it as a feature?
- What's the natural ceiling? ($ revenue, # users)
- What would need to be true for this to reach $1M ARR?

**Q5: Can the founder actually build this?**
- What skills and resources are required?
- What's the hardest technical or operational challenge?
- Is this a "first hire" problem (you can't launch without a specific expert)?

### 3. Idea scorecard

Rate the idea on each dimension (1-5):

| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Problem severity | | How painful is this? |
| Market size | | How many people have this problem? |
| Willingness to pay | | Will they pay enough to build a business? |
| Competition gap | | Is there real space for a new entrant? |
| Distribution | | Can you reach customers cheaply? |
| Timing | | Is this the right moment? |
| Founder fit | | Does the founder have an unfair advantage? |
| **Total** | **/35** | |

If the input says nothing about the founder, score founder fit as "?" and ask about it in the verdict.

**Scoring guide:**
- 28-35: Strong idea. Validate fast and build.
- 21-27: Promising but has gaps. Fix the weakest dimension before building.
- 14-20: Significant concerns. Needs a major pivot or a different angle.
- Below 14: Start over. The idea has fundamental problems.

### 4. Validation experiments

Recommend 3 specific experiments to run before writing any code. For each:
- What to test (one specific assumption)
- How to test it (exact steps, not "talk to users")
- Success criteria (a specific number or outcome)
- Time and cost (under 2 weeks and under $200)

### 5. The honest verdict

End with one of:
- **Build it**, with the single most important thing to do this week
- **Pivot it**, with the angle that would make this much stronger
- **Kill it**, with why, and which adjacent problem is worth solving instead

## Rules

- Be honest, not encouraging. False encouragement kills startups.
- Every critique must be specific and actionable.
- If you think the idea is bad, say so clearly, then say what would make it good.
- Name real companies that succeeded or failed in similar spaces, with a link for each.
- Keep total output under 1500 words.

Attribution

emotixcoemotixco
View sourceMore from emotixco →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →