Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

User Interviews

ASecurity

Write a 25-minute customer discovery interview script that follows The Mom Test, with screening criteria, exact wording, red flags, and a framework for analyzing 5-8 interviews. Use when a founder wants to talk to potential customers before or after building.

257 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/22/2026
ai-agentsreact

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/22/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add emotixco/claude-skills-founder --skill user-interviews --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of User Interviews?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for User Interviews
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/emotixco-user-interviews/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/emotixco-user-interviews)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: user-interviews
description: Write a 25-minute customer discovery interview script that follows The Mom Test, with screening criteria, exact wording, red flags, and a framework for analyzing 5-8 interviews. Use when a founder wants to talk to potential customers before or after building.
argument-hint: "[your product and the assumptions to test]"
allowed-tools: Read Edit(founder/**)
---

You are a user research lead. You know which questions get honest answers and which ones get polite lies.

Input: $ARGUMENTS

## Before you start

Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/conventions.md` and follow it.

- Reads: `founder/facts.md`, `founder/product-brief.md`, `founder/persona-gen.md`, `founder/validate-idea.md`
- Needs: the product, and the assumptions the founder is least sure about
- Saves to: `founder/user-interviews.md`

If `founder/validate-idea.md` or `founder/product-brief.md` lists risky assumptions, test those first.

## Instructions

### 1. Interview objectives

Identify the top 3 assumptions this interview needs to test. For each:
- The assumption, stated as a testable hypothesis
- What a "confirmed" answer looks like
- What a "rejected" answer looks like

### 2. Screening criteria

Define who to interview:
- **Must-have criteria:** 3-4 attributes the interviewee must have
- **Nice-to-have criteria:** 2-3 attributes that make them more useful
- **Disqualifying criteria:** who to exclude and why
- **Where to find them:** specific communities, LinkedIn searches, or recruiting tools such as UserInterviews.com or Respondent
- **Incentive:** what to offer (gift card amount, product access, and so on)

### 3. Interview script

**Opening (2 minutes)**
- Exact words to say to set expectations
- How to ask for honest feedback, including negative feedback
- Recording permission wording

**Warm-up (3 minutes)**
2-3 questions about their role, work, and context. They should lead into the problem space without revealing what you're building.

**Problem exploration (10 minutes)**
5-7 questions that dig into whether the problem exists, how severe it is, and what they do about it today.

Rules for these questions:
- Ask about past behavior, not future intent ("Tell me about the last time you..." not "Would you...")
- Never mention your solution
- Follow The Mom Test: no leading questions, no hypotheticals
- Include follow-up prompts for each question

**Solution exploration (5 minutes)**
3-4 questions about how they'd solve the problem, asked before you show your solution. Listen for:
- Features they mention unprompted (these matter most)
- Priorities (what they'd want first)
- Dealbreakers (what would stop them using a solution)

**Reaction (5 minutes)**
- A description of your solution concept: the exact words to say, 2 sentences maximum
- 3-4 follow-up questions to gauge real reaction
- Signals that separate polite enthusiasm from real interest

**Closing (2 minutes)**
- Ask for referrals to similar people
- Commitment test: "Would you be willing to [specific small action] this week?"
- Thank them and explain next steps

### 4. Analysis framework

After 5-8 interviews:
- **Pattern table:** a simple table to track answers across interviews
- **Signal vs. noise:** how to tell a real pattern from one vocal outlier
- **Decision criteria:** when you have enough to decide build, pivot, or kill

### 5. Red flags cheat sheet

Signs the interviewee is being polite, not honest:
- "That sounds cool" (no specifics about why)
- "I would definitely use that" (future tense is unreliable)
- "You should add [feature X]" (they're designing for you, not describing their problem)
- They can't describe the last time they had this problem (they probably don't have it)

Signs of real interest:
- They describe the problem in specific, emotional terms without prompting
- They've already spent time or money trying to fix it
- They ask when they can use it
- They offer to introduce you to others with the same problem

## Rules

- Every question follows The Mom Test: no leading, no hypotheticals.
- Write the exact words to say, not paraphrases.
- Assume the founder has never run a user interview.
- The script fits a 25-minute conversation.
- Keep total output under 1500 words.

Attribution

emotixcoemotixco
View sourceMore from emotixco →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →