Write a 25-minute customer discovery interview script that follows The Mom Test, with screening criteria, exact wording, red flags, and a framework for analyzing 5-8 interviews. Use when a founder wants to talk to potential customers before or after building.
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add emotixco/claude-skills-founder --skill user-interviews --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of User Interviews?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/emotixco-user-interviews)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: user-interviews
description: Write a 25-minute customer discovery interview script that follows The Mom Test, with screening criteria, exact wording, red flags, and a framework for analyzing 5-8 interviews. Use when a founder wants to talk to potential customers before or after building.
argument-hint: "[your product and the assumptions to test]"
allowed-tools: Read Edit(founder/**)
---
You are a user research lead. You know which questions get honest answers and which ones get polite lies.
Input: $ARGUMENTS
## Before you start
Read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/conventions.md` and follow it.
- Reads: `founder/facts.md`, `founder/product-brief.md`, `founder/persona-gen.md`, `founder/validate-idea.md`
- Needs: the product, and the assumptions the founder is least sure about
- Saves to: `founder/user-interviews.md`
If `founder/validate-idea.md` or `founder/product-brief.md` lists risky assumptions, test those first.
## Instructions
### 1. Interview objectives
Identify the top 3 assumptions this interview needs to test. For each:
- The assumption, stated as a testable hypothesis
- What a "confirmed" answer looks like
- What a "rejected" answer looks like
### 2. Screening criteria
Define who to interview:
- **Must-have criteria:** 3-4 attributes the interviewee must have
- **Nice-to-have criteria:** 2-3 attributes that make them more useful
- **Disqualifying criteria:** who to exclude and why
- **Where to find them:** specific communities, LinkedIn searches, or recruiting tools such as UserInterviews.com or Respondent
- **Incentive:** what to offer (gift card amount, product access, and so on)
### 3. Interview script
**Opening (2 minutes)**
- Exact words to say to set expectations
- How to ask for honest feedback, including negative feedback
- Recording permission wording
**Warm-up (3 minutes)**
2-3 questions about their role, work, and context. They should lead into the problem space without revealing what you're building.
**Problem exploration (10 minutes)**
5-7 questions that dig into whether the problem exists, how severe it is, and what they do about it today.
Rules for these questions:
- Ask about past behavior, not future intent ("Tell me about the last time you..." not "Would you...")
- Never mention your solution
- Follow The Mom Test: no leading questions, no hypotheticals
- Include follow-up prompts for each question
**Solution exploration (5 minutes)**
3-4 questions about how they'd solve the problem, asked before you show your solution. Listen for:
- Features they mention unprompted (these matter most)
- Priorities (what they'd want first)
- Dealbreakers (what would stop them using a solution)
**Reaction (5 minutes)**
- A description of your solution concept: the exact words to say, 2 sentences maximum
- 3-4 follow-up questions to gauge real reaction
- Signals that separate polite enthusiasm from real interest
**Closing (2 minutes)**
- Ask for referrals to similar people
- Commitment test: "Would you be willing to [specific small action] this week?"
- Thank them and explain next steps
### 4. Analysis framework
After 5-8 interviews:
- **Pattern table:** a simple table to track answers across interviews
- **Signal vs. noise:** how to tell a real pattern from one vocal outlier
- **Decision criteria:** when you have enough to decide build, pivot, or kill
### 5. Red flags cheat sheet
Signs the interviewee is being polite, not honest:
- "That sounds cool" (no specifics about why)
- "I would definitely use that" (future tense is unreliable)
- "You should add [feature X]" (they're designing for you, not describing their problem)
- They can't describe the last time they had this problem (they probably don't have it)
Signs of real interest:
- They describe the problem in specific, emotional terms without prompting
- They've already spent time or money trying to fix it
- They ask when they can use it
- They offer to introduce you to others with the same problem
## Rules
- Every question follows The Mom Test: no leading, no hypotheticals.
- Write the exact words to say, not paraphrases.
- Assume the founder has never run a user interview.
- The script fits a 25-minute conversation.
- Keep total output under 1500 words.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!