Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Research

ASecurity

ALWAYS use for ANY request to find academic papers - "find papers on X", "what does the literature say about X", "is there research on this", "who has written about X", "find me cites for this claim", "literature search", "any papers in the journals I like", "top journals only", "recent work on X", "has anyone studied this". Use proactively before answering an empirical or doctrinal question from memory, and never run scholar/consensus/paperpile by hand in sequence - this skill parallelizes t...

21 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/19/2026
researchpythonrustgobash

Works with

climcp

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add edwinhu/workflows --skill research --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Research?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Research
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/edwinhu-research/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/edwinhu-research)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: research
description: ALWAYS use for ANY request to find academic papers - "find papers on X", "what does the literature say about X", "is there research on this", "who has written about X", "find me cites for this claim", "literature search", "any papers in the journals I like", "top journals only", "recent work on X", "has anyone studied this". Use proactively before answering an empirical or doctrinal question from memory, and never run scholar/consensus/paperpile by hand in sequence - this skill parallelizes them. NOT for open-web report writing (deep-research).
version: 0.2.0
user-invocable: false
---

# Academic Literature Search

**What this skill carries** — grep `references/` for any subject the names below miss:
!`d=${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}; command -v skill-toc >/dev/null 2>&1 && exec skill-toc "$d"; s=$HOME/.claude/skills/plugin-utils/bin/skill-toc; [ -x "$s" ] && exec "$s" "$d"; echo "(skill-toc unavailable: references and scripts are NOT listed here — install the plugin-utils plugin, or start a new session so its bin/ reaches PATH)"`

Multi-source academic search with deduplication, DOI resolution, and journal filtering.

**Always read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/trusted-journals.local.md` before presenting results.**

## IRON LAW: Always Use the Script

**NEVER run the sources manually in sequence. ALWAYS use the research script. This is not negotiable.**

```bash
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "<query>" [--n 50] [--min-citations N]
```

The script parallelizes all sources and DOI resolution automatically. Doing it manually serializes everything and triples wall time.

## Sources

| Source | Tool | Strength | Default |
|--------|------|----------|---------|
| `scholar lookup` | Keyword/citation-ranked | Finance classics, foundational papers | ✅ |
| `consensus` CLI | Empirical corpus, sorted by citations | Accounting/finance empirical literature; law reviews (T14 flagships are indexed) | ✅ |
| Paperpile bib | Personal library (`My Library.bib`) | Papers already in your collection | ✅ |
| `scholar search` | NL semantic | Conceptual literature, unindexed specialty reviews | opt-in (`--scholar-search`) |

`scholar search` is opt-in because it shares rate limits with `scholar lookup` and 429s when run in parallel. Add `--scholar-search` when you specifically want semantic/NL results.

## Trusted-journal filtering

`--journals-only` restricts the **consensus** source server-side to the journals
listed in `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/trusted-journals.local.md`
(one exact name per line, `#` comments). Use it whenever the user asks for
"journals I like", "relevant journals only", or "top journals" — it returns `--n`
trusted papers instead of an unfiltered set that collapses to a handful once
you mark ★.

The other sources are unaffected: scholar and the Paperpile bib still run
unfiltered, so the union stays broad. To add a journal, verify the exact indexed
name with `~/projects/consensus-cli/consensus journals "<partial>"` before
appending it — an unindexed name matches nothing, silently.

## Output Schema

The script outputs a JSON array. Each paper has:

```json
{
  "title": "...",
  "authors": ["..."],
  "year": 2023,
  "journal": "...",           // original journal label (may be SSRN)
  "journal_resolved": "...",  // CrossRef-resolved journal (present if SSRN label was resolved)
  "doi": "...",
  "citations": 150,
  "takeaway": "...",
  "url": "...",
  "sources": ["lookup", "consensus"]  // all sources that returned this paper
}
```

## LLM Review Step (After Script)

After running the script, read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/trusted-journals.local.md` and cross-reference each paper's effective journal (use `journal_resolved` if present, else `journal`) against the trusted list:

- ★ = journal matches trusted list
- Papers in `sources: ["lookup", "consensus"]` (multiple sources) = higher confidence
- Papers from `bib` source = already in user's library (flag with 📚)

### Presentation Format

```
★ [Title](url) — Authors (Year), *Journal*, N citations  [sources]
  > Takeaway: ...

📚 ★ [Title](url) — Authors (Year), *Journal*  [in your library]
  > Takeaway: ...
```

Trusted papers first (sorted by citations desc), then non-trusted in a collapsed table.

## Red Flags

- About to run the sources manually in sequence → STOP. That serializes the work and triples wall time; run `uv run python3 research.py "<query>"`.
- About to call `mcp__consensus__search` → STOP. It is rate-limited to 3 results; the script uses the CLI binary automatically.
- About to present results before reading trusted-journals.local.md → STOP. The ★ trusted-journal signals come from that file; read it first, always.
- User asked for their journals only, and you ran unfiltered then dropped most results → STOP. Pass `--journals-only`; it filters server-side so all `--n` results count.
- About to append a journal to trusted-journals.local.md without verifying it → STOP. `consensus journals "<partial>"` first; a wrong name fails silently.
- About to use the `journal` field when `journal_resolved` is present → STOP. The SSRN label hides the real venue; always prefer `journal_resolved`.

## Common Patterns

```bash
# Standard search
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "mandatory disclosure"

# With citation floor
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "poison pill" --min-citations 50

# Trusted journals only (server-side filter on the consensus source)
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "board independence" --journals-only

# More results from Consensus
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "corporate governance" --n 100

# Disable streaming (wait for all sources, output pretty-printed JSON)
uv run python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/research.py" "mandatory disclosure" --no-stream
```

## Streaming Mode (default)

Without `--stream`, the script waits for all four sources before emitting anything — Consensus takes ~60s, so fast sources (bib <1s, Scholar ~10s) sit idle.

With `--stream`, the script emits one NDJSON line per event as it happens:

```json
{"event": "source", "source": "bib", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "source", "source": "scholar-lookup", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "source", "source": "scholar-search", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "source", "source": "consensus", "papers": [...]}
{"event": "final", "papers": [...]}
```

- `source` events: raw papers from each source as it completes (may have duplicates across sources)
- `final` event: deduplicated + CrossRef-resolved unified set

Process `source` events as they arrive to present early results; use `final` for the complete deduplicated list. Pass `--no-stream` for batch mode (pretty-printed JSON after all sources complete).

Attribution

edwinhuedwinhu
View sourceMore from edwinhu →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

798221 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →