Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment - applies TDD to process documentation by testing with subagents before writing, iterating until bulletproof against rationalization
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ed3dai/ed3d-plugins --skill writing-skills --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Writing Skills?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ed3dai-writing-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: writing-skills
description: Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment - applies TDD to process documentation by testing with subagents before writing, iterating until bulletproof against rationalization
user-invocable: false
---
# Writing Skills
**REQUIRED BACKGROUND:** Read ed3d-extending-claude:writing-claude-directives for foundational guidance on token efficiency, discovery optimization, and compliance techniques. This skill focuses on TDD methodology specific to skill creation.
## Core Principle
**Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation.**
Write test cases (pressure scenarios), watch them fail (baseline behavior), write the skill, watch tests pass, refactor (close loopholes).
**Iron Law:** No skill without a failing test first. Same as TDD for code.
## TDD Mapping
| TDD Concept | Skill Creation |
|-------------|----------------|
| Test case | Pressure scenario with subagent |
| Production code | SKILL.md document |
| RED | Agent violates rule without skill |
| GREEN | Agent complies with skill present |
| Refactor | Close loopholes, re-test |
## When to Create a Skill
**Create when:**
- Technique wasn't intuitively obvious
- You'd reference this across projects
- Pattern applies broadly
- Others would benefit
**Don't create for:**
- One-off solutions
- Standard practices documented elsewhere
- Project-specific conventions (use CLAUDE.md)
## Skill Types
**Technique:** Concrete method with steps (condition-based-waiting, root-cause-tracing)
**Pattern:** Mental model for problems (flatten-with-flags, test-invariants)
**Reference:** API docs, syntax guides, tool documentation
## Directory Structure
```
skills/
skill-name/
SKILL.md # Main reference (required)
supporting-file.* # Only if needed
```
**Separate files for:** Heavy reference (100+ lines), reusable tools/scripts
**Keep inline:** Principles, code patterns (<50 lines), everything else
## SKILL.md Template
```markdown
---
name: Skill-Name-With-Hyphens
description: Use when [triggers/symptoms] - [what it does, third person]
---
# Skill Name
## Overview
Core principle in 1-2 sentences.
## When to Use
Symptoms and use cases. When NOT to use.
## Core Pattern
Before/after comparison or key technique.
## Quick Reference
Table or bullets for scanning.
## Common Mistakes
What goes wrong + fixes.
```
## RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
### RED: Baseline Test
Run pressure scenario WITHOUT skill:
1. Create combined pressures (time + sunk cost + exhaustion)
2. Document exact violations and rationalizations verbatim
3. Identify failure patterns
### GREEN: Write Minimal Skill
1. Address specific baseline failures identified in RED
2. Run scenarios WITH skill
3. Verify compliance
### REFACTOR: Close Loopholes
1. Find NEW rationalizations from testing
2. Add explicit counters
3. Re-test until bulletproof
**REQUIRED:** Use ed3d-extending-claude:testing-skills-with-subagents for complete methodology.
## Testing by Skill Type
| Type | Test Approach | Success Criteria |
|------|---------------|------------------|
| Discipline | Pressure scenarios, combined stressors | Follows rule under maximum pressure |
| Technique | Application scenarios, edge cases | Successfully applies to new scenario |
| Pattern | Recognition + counter-examples | Knows when/how and when NOT to apply |
| Reference | Retrieval + application tests | Finds and correctly uses information |
## Common Rationalizations to Block
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Obviously clear" | Clear to you ≠ clear to agents. Test. |
| "Just a reference" | References have gaps. Test retrieval. |
| "Testing is overkill" | Untested skills have issues. Always. |
| "Too simple" | Simple things break. Test anyway. |
| "No time" | Fixing broken skills wastes more time. |
**All mean: Test before deploying.**
## Anti-Patterns
- **Narrative example:** "In session 2025-10-03, we found..." (too specific, not reusable)
- **Multi-language dilution:** example-js.js, example-py.py (mediocre quality, maintenance burden)
- **Code in flowcharts:** Can't copy-paste, hard to read
- **Generic labels:** helper1, step3 (labels need semantic meaning)
## Skill Creation Checklist
**IMPORTANT:** Use TaskCreate to track each item (or TodoWrite in older Claude Code versions).
**RED Phase:**
- [ ] Create pressure scenarios (3+ combined pressures for discipline skills)
- [ ] Run WITHOUT skill - document baseline failures verbatim
- [ ] Identify rationalization patterns
**GREEN Phase:**
- [ ] Name uses letters, numbers, hyphens only
- [ ] Description starts with "Use when...", third person
- [ ] Address specific baseline failures
- [ ] One excellent example (not multi-language)
- [ ] Run WITH skill - verify compliance
**REFACTOR Phase:**
- [ ] Identify new rationalizations
- [ ] Add explicit counters
- [ ] Re-test until bulletproof
**Deployment:**
- [ ] Commit and push
- [ ] Consider contributing via PR
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!