Stage ⑤.a Ship sub — release-preflight gate. Runs `harnessed release-preflight` (read-only: CHANGELOG [Unreleased] non-empty + version + git-clean + tag-absent). A failing gate blocks shipping. Nothing is pushed/published/tagged here.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add easyinplay/harnessed --skill preflight --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Preflight?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/easyinplay-preflight)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ship-preflight
description: |
Stage ⑤.a Ship sub — release-preflight gate. Runs `harnessed release-preflight`
(read-only: CHANGELOG [Unreleased] non-empty + version + git-clean + tag-absent).
A failing gate blocks shipping. Nothing is pushed/published/tagged here.
trigger_phrases:
- "release preflight"
- "release ready"
- "ship preflight"
- "发布就绪检查"
---
# ship-preflight (Stage ⑤.a)
## Overview
The machine-checkable "PR ready != release ready" gate. Runs the harnessed-native
`harnessed release-preflight` command, which inspects (read-only) whether the repo is
ready to tag a release:
| check | passes when |
| ----- | ----------- |
| `changelog` | `## [Unreleased]` has entries (this release is documented) |
| `version` | `package.json` has a valid semver |
| `git-clean` | the working tree has no uncommitted changes |
| `tag-absent` | a `v<version>` tag does NOT already exist |
## Process
1. Run `harnessed release-preflight`.
2. If any check fails, STOP — surface the `fix:` hints and do not proceed to PR/tag.
- Empty `[Unreleased]` is the most common failure: document the release first.
3. If all pass, the repo is **tag-ready**. The ship master continues to PR/deploy.
## Boundary
This gate is READ-ONLY. It never pushes, publishes, or creates a tag. The actual
`npm publish` + GitHub release happen in `publish.yml` CI when a `v<version>` tag is
pushed (with explicit user approval).
## How to invoke
!`harnessed checkpoint intent ship-preflight`
> The banner above (when present) means this invocation is REGISTERED with the engine (an intent marker) — not yet compliant: the steps below (prompt → spawn → checkpoint complete) resolve it, and a per-turn `<workflow-intent>` reminder persists until they run.
The numbered sequence below **is** the state machine — execute it with Bash. Do NOT improvise
an equivalent flow from the Overview above: freelancing bypasses the engine (no ledger, no
evidence guard). harnessed gives you the spawn-ready prompt; YOU spawn the subagent with a
CC-native Task / Agent tool (keeps the session responsive + lets clarification round-trips reach the user).
Do NOT pipe to `harnessed run ship-preflight` — that is the CI/headless path (in-process SDK spawn
that blocks the session inside Claude Code).
1. Bash: `harnessed prompt ship-preflight --task "$ARGUMENTS" --json` → parse `{prompt, max_iterations, model}`.
2. Spawn a CC-native subagent (Task / Agent tool) with that `prompt` and `model`, then drive delivery with harnessed's own completion gate:
- on return, write the subagent's final output to a file and run `harnessed checkpoint complete ship-preflight --result-file <path>` — it is fail-closed on the declared artifacts, the TDD boundary, and the verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`.
- if it blocks, run `harnessed checkpoint fail ship-preflight --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt; it prints BUDGET-EXHAUSTED / NO-PROGRESS / BREAK-LOOP when a stop condition is reached.
- respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired. Any one of them means stop: re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user. Never respawn past a stop directive.
3. If the output contains `STATUS: NEEDS_CLARIFICATION` + a question list: STOP, relay them verbatim via AskUserQuestion, append the answers to the spec, then re-spawn the same sub.
4. On `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`: write the subagent’s final output to a file, then Bash `harnessed checkpoint complete ship-preflight --result-file <path> --summary "<one-line>"`. Fail-CLOSED — it blocks unless every declared `artifacts_expected` file exists, the TDD boundary passes (non-empty evidence / both the red and green sides present / the test file was not deleted), and the result carries a verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>` (or a structured COMPLETE status). `--result <text>` is the inline variant; `--result-file` wins and is quoting-safe on Windows. `--force` records an audited override (`evidence_status=overridden`) — it does not silently pass.
5. If the complete gate blocked: Bash `harnessed checkpoint fail ship-preflight --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt. It prints `BUDGET-EXHAUSTED` / `NO-PROGRESS` / `BREAK-LOOP` once a stop condition is reached. Respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired; any one of them means STOP — re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user.
<!-- harnessed-generated:v4.12.0 -->
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!