Skip to content
Back to skills

Paranoid

ASecurity

Stage ④.c verify sub-workflow — gstack /review Paranoid Staff Engineer 关键模块 PR 前强制 (bundled gstack governance gate — mandatory before critical-module PR)。Gate: judgments.stage-routing.verify-paranoid-critical.fires (phase.is_critical_module == true) — 默认 critical fire only; 非关键模块 skip。 schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available (gstack-review) + 1 phase (gate ref is_critical_module conditional)。 Triggered by slash command `/verify-paranoid` af...

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 28, 2026
ai-agentsgobash

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add easyinplay/harnessed --skill paranoid --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Paranoid?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Paranoid
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/easyinplay-paranoid/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/easyinplay-paranoid)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: verify-paranoid
description: |
  Stage ④.c verify sub-workflow — gstack /review Paranoid Staff Engineer 关键模块 PR 前强制
  (bundled gstack governance gate — mandatory before critical-module PR)。Gate:
  judgments.stage-routing.verify-paranoid-critical.fires (phase.is_critical_module == true) —
  默认 critical fire only; 非关键模块 skip。
  schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available
  (gstack-review) + 1 phase (gate ref is_critical_module conditional)。
  Triggered by slash command
  `/verify-paranoid` after `harnessed setup`.
trigger_phrases:
  - "verify paranoid"
  - "paranoid staff engineer review"
  - "关键模块审查"
  - "gstack review"
  - "跑 verify-paranoid"
---

# verify-paranoid workflow (v3)

## Overview

1-phase sub-workflow mapping CLAUDE.md "gstack 治理关卡 🔒 关键模块 PR 前强制 — `/review`"
onto harnessed runtime (Phase v3.0-3.4 W0.12 — D-04 Stage ④ Verify 7 sub + D-12 gstack
治理关卡 + Pattern A sub-workflow ship)。

| phase | id | upstream | model | capability | gate |
| ----- | -- | -------- | ----- | ---------- | ---- |
| 1 | `01-review` | gstack | opus | `{{ capabilities.gstack-review.cmd }}` | `judgments.stage-routing.verify-paranoid-critical.fires` |

Per-phase config loads from `workflows/verify/paranoid/workflow.yaml`; engine 4-level gate
resolver evaluates `phase.is_critical_module == true` via expr-eval — true 则 invoke gstack
`/review`, false 则 skip (chain_isolation 3 铁律 R20.16 sister verify-work v2 phase 04)。

## Capability refs

Sister `workflows/capabilities.yaml` entries:
- `gstack-review` — Bucket 3 治理关卡 (impl: gstack, cmd: /review,
  fires_when: phase.is_critical_module == true)

## Gate ref

Sister `workflows/judgments/stage-routing.yaml`:
- `verify-paranoid-critical.fires` — `phase.stage == 'verify' and phase.is_critical_module == true`
  (默认 critical fire only; 普通 PR 应跳过 — gstack-review 是 Paranoid Staff Engineer 重武器)

## Routing rules (sister CLAUDE.md "gstack 治理关卡")

- ✅ **触发**: 关键模块 PR 前 (auth / payment / data migration / core algorithm 等)
- ❌ **跳过**: 常规 PR / docs / config / 非核心 module

## How to invoke

!`harnessed checkpoint intent verify-paranoid`

> The banner above (when present) means this invocation is REGISTERED with the engine (an intent marker) — not yet compliant: the steps below (prompt → spawn → checkpoint complete) resolve it, and a per-turn `<workflow-intent>` reminder persists until they run.

The numbered sequence below **is** the state machine — execute it with Bash. Do NOT improvise
an equivalent flow from the Overview above: freelancing bypasses the engine (no ledger, no
evidence guard). harnessed gives you the spawn-ready prompt; YOU spawn the subagent with a
{{ host.native }} {{ host.spawn_subagent }} (keeps the session responsive + lets clarification round-trips reach the user).

Do NOT pipe to `harnessed run verify-paranoid` — that is the CI/headless path ({{ host.harnessed_run_warning_note.execution_tail }}

1. Bash: `harnessed prompt verify-paranoid --task "$ARGUMENTS" --json` → parse `{prompt, max_iterations, model}`.
2. Spawn a {{ host.native }} subagent ({{ host.spawn_subagent }}) with that `prompt` and `model`, then drive delivery with harnessed's own completion gate:
   - on return, write the subagent's final output to a file and run `harnessed checkpoint complete verify-paranoid --result-file <path>` — it is fail-closed on the declared artifacts, the TDD boundary, and the verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`.
   - if it blocks, run `harnessed checkpoint fail verify-paranoid --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt; it prints BUDGET-EXHAUSTED / NO-PROGRESS / BREAK-LOOP when a stop condition is reached.
   - respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired. Any one of them means stop: re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user. Never respawn past a stop directive.
3. If the output contains `STATUS: NEEDS_CLARIFICATION` + a question list: STOP, relay them verbatim via {{ host.ask_user }}, append the answers to the spec, then re-spawn the same sub.
4. On `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`: write the subagent’s final output to a file, then Bash `harnessed checkpoint complete verify-paranoid --result-file <path> --summary "<one-line>"`. Fail-CLOSED — it blocks unless every declared `artifacts_expected` file exists, the TDD boundary passes (non-empty evidence / both the red and green sides present / the test file was not deleted), and the result carries a verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>` (or a structured COMPLETE status). `--result <text>` is the inline variant; `--result-file` wins and is quoting-safe on Windows. `--force` records an audited override (`evidence_status=overridden`) — it does not silently pass.
5. If the complete gate blocked: Bash `harnessed checkpoint fail verify-paranoid --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt. It prints `BUDGET-EXHAUSTED` / `NO-PROGRESS` / `BREAK-LOOP` once a stop condition is reached. Respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired; any one of them means STOP — re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user.

<!-- harnessed-generated:v4.12.0 -->

## References

- D-04 Stage ④ Verify 7 sub 分解
- D-12 gstack 治理关卡强制
- workflows/capabilities.yaml — gstack-review
- workflows/judgments/stage-routing.yaml — verify-paranoid-critical trigger
- workflows/defaults.yaml — ralph_max_iterations.verify-paranoid.* values (W2.2 backfill)
- workflows/verify-work/workflow.yaml v2 SHIPPED phase 04-gstack-review-conditional sister verbatim

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3 KB
  • workflow.yaml1.5 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.