Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Multispec?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/easyinplay-multispec)
---
name: verify-multispec
description: |
Stage ④.h verify sub-workflow — 4-specialist {{ host.team.singular }} Pattern C 多维度审查 (关键发布 /
大重构 PR 升级, code-review + gstack-review + gstack-cso + gstack-qa 4 {{ host.teammate }} 互相
{{ host.send_message }} 质询, NOT fire-and-forget subagent fan-out; bundled {{ host.team.attributive }} Pattern C
routing). Cleanup mandatory: {{ host.teams_cleanup_note.shutdown_phrase }} (bundled cleanup discipline).
schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available
(agent-teams 3 + 4 specialist capability) + 2 phase (01-team-create on critical-release
invoke / 02-team-cleanup mandatory shutdown)。
Triggered by slash command
`/verify-multispec` after `harnessed setup`.
trigger_phrases:
- "verify multispec"
- "4-specialist Agent Team"
- "Pattern C 多维度审查"
- "critical release review"
- "跑 verify-multispec"
---
# verify-multispec workflow (v3)
## Overview
2-phase sub-workflow mapping CLAUDE.md "Verify 阶段 — 关键发布 / 大重构 PR 升级 {{ host.team.singular }}
Pattern C" onto harnessed runtime (Phase v3.0-3.4 W0.13e — D-04 Stage ④ Verify 7 sub +
D-11 {{ host.team.attributive }} + Pattern A sub-workflow ship)。
| phase | id | upstream | model | capability | gate / on |
| ----- | -- | -------- | ----- | ---------- | --------- |
| 1 | `01-team-create` | claude-platform | opus | `{{ capabilities.agent-teams-create.cmd }}` | `parallelism: agent-teams-upgrade.fires`; `on: is_major_release OR is_large_refactor → invoke` |
| 2 | `02-team-cleanup` | claude-platform | haiku | `{{ capabilities.agent-teams-shutdown.cmd }}` | mandatory 防呆清单 |
Per-phase config loads from `workflows/verify/multispec/workflow.yaml`; phase 01 spawns 4
background {{ host.teammate }} (code-review + gstack-review + gstack-cso + gstack-qa) with
{{ host.multispec_spawn_note }}; phase 02 mandatory {{ host.teams_cleanup_note.shutdown_phrase }} (bundled
{{ host.teams_cleanup_note.multispec }}
## Capability refs
Sister `workflows/capabilities.yaml` entries:
- `agent-teams-create` — Bucket 5 Agent Teams (impl: claude-platform, cmd: `Agent(name, run_in_background=true)`)
- `agent-teams-send-message` — Bucket 5 Agent Teams (impl: claude-platform, cmd: SendMessage)
- `agent-teams-shutdown` — Bucket 5 Agent Teams (impl: claude-platform, cmd: `ask the <teammate-name> teammate to shut down`)
- `code-review` — Bucket 1 mattpocock ({{ host.teammate }} 1)
- `gstack-review` — Bucket 3 治理关卡 ({{ host.teammate }} 2 Paranoid Staff Engineer)
- `gstack-cso` — Bucket 3 治理关卡 ({{ host.teammate }} 3 安全审查)
- `gstack-qa` — Bucket 3 治理关卡 ({{ host.teammate }} 4 端到端 QA)
## Parallelism + on gate refs
Sister `workflows/judgments/parallelism-gate.yaml`:
- `agent-teams-upgrade.fires` — 5 OR-chain (teammate_send_message_needed / subagent_context_overflow /
shared_task_list / opposing_hypothesis_debate / fullstack_three_way)
Phase-level `on` clause (critical-release 升级触发):
- `if: phase.is_major_release == true or phase.is_large_refactor == true` → `action: invoke`
- else → `action: skip`
## Routing rules (bundled {{ host.team.attributive }} routing — `workflows/judgments/parallelism-gate.yaml`)
- ✅ **触发**: 关键发布 / 大重构 PR (≥3 specialist 需互相质询而非 fire-and-forget)
- ❌ **跳过**: 常规 PR / 单点任务 (sister verify-code-review fan-out + verify-paranoid 已够用且省 token)
- **Token 估算 prereq**: `team_cost < 2 × subagent_cost` (engine-level check; bundled cost guideline)
- **Cleanup mandatory**: phase 02-team-cleanup `agent-teams-shutdown` 必跑 (bundled cleanup discipline)
## How to invoke
!`harnessed checkpoint intent verify-multispec`
> The banner above (when present) means this invocation is REGISTERED with the engine (an intent marker) — not yet compliant: the steps below (prompt → spawn → checkpoint complete) resolve it, and a per-turn `<workflow-intent>` reminder persists until they run.
The numbered sequence below **is** the state machine — execute it with Bash. Do NOT improvise
an equivalent flow from the Overview above: freelancing bypasses the engine (no ledger, no
evidence guard). harnessed gives you the spawn-ready prompt; YOU spawn the subagent with a
{{ host.native }} {{ host.spawn_subagent }} (keeps the session responsive + lets clarification round-trips reach the user).
Do NOT pipe to `harnessed run verify-multispec` — that is the CI/headless path ({{ host.harnessed_run_warning_note.execution_tail }}
1. Bash: `harnessed prompt verify-multispec --task "$ARGUMENTS" --json` → parse `{prompt, max_iterations, model}`.
2. Spawn a {{ host.native }} subagent ({{ host.spawn_subagent }}) with that `prompt` and `model`, then drive delivery with harnessed's own completion gate:
- on return, write the subagent's final output to a file and run `harnessed checkpoint complete verify-multispec --result-file <path>` — it is fail-closed on the declared artifacts, the TDD boundary, and the verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`.
- if it blocks, run `harnessed checkpoint fail verify-multispec --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt; it prints BUDGET-EXHAUSTED / NO-PROGRESS / BREAK-LOOP when a stop condition is reached.
- respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired. Any one of them means stop: re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user. Never respawn past a stop directive.
3. If the output contains `STATUS: NEEDS_CLARIFICATION` + a question list: STOP, relay them verbatim via {{ host.ask_user }}, append the answers to the spec, then re-spawn the same sub.
4. On `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`: write the subagent’s final output to a file, then Bash `harnessed checkpoint complete verify-multispec --result-file <path> --summary "<one-line>"`. Fail-CLOSED — it blocks unless every declared `artifacts_expected` file exists, the TDD boundary passes (non-empty evidence / both the red and green sides present / the test file was not deleted), and the result carries a verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>` (or a structured COMPLETE status). `--result <text>` is the inline variant; `--result-file` wins and is quoting-safe on Windows. `--force` records an audited override (`evidence_status=overridden`) — it does not silently pass.
5. If the complete gate blocked: Bash `harnessed checkpoint fail verify-multispec --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt. It prints `BUDGET-EXHAUSTED` / `NO-PROGRESS` / `BREAK-LOOP` once a stop condition is reached. Respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired; any one of them means STOP — re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user.
<!-- harnessed-generated:v4.12.0 -->
## References
- D-04 Stage ④ Verify 7 sub 分解
- D-11 {{ host.team.attributive }} 4-specialist Pattern C upgrade
- workflows/capabilities.yaml — agent-teams-{create,send-message,shutdown} + 4 specialist
- workflows/judgments/stage-routing.yaml — verify-multispec-critical-release trigger
- workflows/judgments/parallelism-gate.yaml — agent-teams-upgrade.fires (5 OR-chain)
- workflows/verify-work/workflow.yaml v2 SHIPPED phase 09-agent-team-multispecialist sister verbatim