Skip to content
Back to skills

Design

ASecurity

Stage ④.f verify sub-workflow — gstack /design-review 设计系统一致性 + AI 审美问题识别 (has_design_changes 触发, 可选 conditional; bundled verify-stage optional /design-review step). schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available (gstack-design-review + ui-ux-pro-max + design-taste-frontend) + 1 phase (gate ref has_design_changes conditional)。Triggered by harnessed CLI `harnessed verify-design --phase <num>` or slash command `/verify-design` after `harnessed setup`.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 28, 2026
ai-agentsbashfrontend

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add easyinplay/harnessed --skill design --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Design?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Design
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/easyinplay-design/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/easyinplay-design)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: verify-design
description: |
  Stage ④.f verify sub-workflow — gstack /design-review 设计系统一致性 + AI 审美问题识别
  (has_design_changes 触发, 可选 conditional; bundled verify-stage optional /design-review step).
  schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available
  (gstack-design-review + ui-ux-pro-max + design-taste-frontend) + 1 phase (gate ref has_design_changes
  conditional)。Triggered by harnessed CLI `harnessed verify-design --phase <num>` or slash
  command `/verify-design` after `harnessed setup`.
trigger_phrases:
  - "verify design"
  - "设计审查"
  - "design review"
  - "gstack design review"
  - "跑 verify-design"
---

# verify-design workflow (v3)

## Overview

3-phase sub-workflow mapping CLAUDE.md "Verify 阶段 — 可选 /design-review" onto harnessed
runtime (Phase v3.0-3.4 W0.13c — D-04 Stage ④ Verify 7 sub + D-12 gstack 治理关卡 +
Pattern A sub-workflow ship; T2.3 两段式 remediation lane 接线)。

| phase | id | upstream | model | capability | gate |
| ----- | -- | -------- | ----- | ---------- | ---- |
| 1 | `01-design-review` | gstack | sonnet | `{{ capabilities.gstack-design-review.cmd }}` | `judgments.web-design-routing.design-review-post.fires` |
| 2 | `02-ui-ux-structure` | ui-ux-pro-max | sonnet | `{{ capabilities.ui-ux-pro-max.cmd }}` | `judgments.web-design-routing.ui-ux-pro-max-structure.fires` |
| 3 | `03-design-taste-polish` | design-taste-frontend | sonnet | `{{ capabilities.design-taste-frontend.cmd }}` | `judgments.web-design-routing.design-taste-polish.fires` |

Per-phase config loads from `workflows/verify/design/workflow.yaml`; engine 4-level gate
resolver evaluates `phase.has_design_changes == true` via expr-eval — true 则 invoke gstack
`/design-review` (设计系统一致性 + AI 审美问题识别), false 则 skip。Phase 02 / 03 是
review 出问题清单后的两段式 remediation lane (结构问题 → Stage 1; 视觉打磨 / AI 味 → Stage 2),
各由 `phase.has_ui_changes == true` 独立 gate。

## Capability refs

Sister `workflows/capabilities.yaml` entries:
- `gstack-design-review` — Bucket 3 治理关卡 (impl: gstack, cmd: /design-review,
  fires_when: has_design_changes)
- `ui-ux-pro-max` — Bucket 2 special-purpose (Stage 1 结构骨架, 数据驱动)
- `design-taste-frontend` — Bucket 2 special-purpose (Stage 2 视觉打磨叠加, anti-slop cross-agent)

## Gate ref

Sister `workflows/judgments/web-design-routing.yaml`:
- `design-review-post.fires` — `phase.stage == 'verify' and phase.has_design_changes == true`
- `ui-ux-pro-max-structure.fires` — `phase.has_ui_changes == true`
- `design-taste-polish.fires` — `phase.has_ui_changes == true`

`workflows/verify/auto/workflow.yaml` 的 `delegates_to` 也 gate 在
`design-review-post.fires` 上 — 之前那条逐字等价的 `stage-routing.verify-design-changes`
副本已删,一个判据一个家。

## Routing rules (bundled web-design routing — `workflows/judgments/web-design-routing.yaml`)

- 两段式叠加 (非仲裁): Stage 1 `ui-ux-pro-max` 理清受众/交互逻辑/设计主轴 (结构骨架, 始终先跑)
- Stage 2 `design-taste-frontend` 在结构之上叠加细节 + 视觉打磨 → 高级感 (anti-slop, 默认凡 UI 改动都叠加)
- 设计完成后可选 gstack `/design-review` 一致性 + AI 审美问题识别

## How to invoke

!`harnessed checkpoint intent verify-design`

> The banner above (when present) means this invocation is REGISTERED with the engine (an intent marker) — not yet compliant: the steps below (prompt → spawn → checkpoint complete) resolve it, and a per-turn `<workflow-intent>` reminder persists until they run.

The numbered sequence below **is** the state machine — execute it with Bash. Do NOT improvise
an equivalent flow from the Overview above: freelancing bypasses the engine (no ledger, no
evidence guard). harnessed gives you the spawn-ready prompt; YOU spawn the subagent with a
{{ host.native }} {{ host.spawn_subagent }} (keeps the session responsive + lets clarification round-trips reach the user).

Do NOT pipe to `harnessed run verify-design` — that is the CI/headless path ({{ host.harnessed_run_warning_note.execution_tail }}

1. Bash: `harnessed prompt verify-design --task "$ARGUMENTS" --json` → parse `{prompt, max_iterations, model}`.
2. Spawn a {{ host.native }} subagent ({{ host.spawn_subagent }}) with that `prompt` and `model`, then drive delivery with harnessed's own completion gate:
   - on return, write the subagent's final output to a file and run `harnessed checkpoint complete verify-design --result-file <path>` — it is fail-closed on the declared artifacts, the TDD boundary, and the verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`.
   - if it blocks, run `harnessed checkpoint fail verify-design --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt; it prints BUDGET-EXHAUSTED / NO-PROGRESS / BREAK-LOOP when a stop condition is reached.
   - respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired. Any one of them means stop: re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user. Never respawn past a stop directive.
3. If the output contains `STATUS: NEEDS_CLARIFICATION` + a question list: STOP, relay them verbatim via {{ host.ask_user }}, append the answers to the spec, then re-spawn the same sub.
4. On `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`: write the subagent’s final output to a file, then Bash `harnessed checkpoint complete verify-design --result-file <path> --summary "<one-line>"`. Fail-CLOSED — it blocks unless every declared `artifacts_expected` file exists, the TDD boundary passes (non-empty evidence / both the red and green sides present / the test file was not deleted), and the result carries a verbatim `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>` (or a structured COMPLETE status). `--result <text>` is the inline variant; `--result-file` wins and is quoting-safe on Windows. `--force` records an audited override (`evidence_status=overridden`) — it does not silently pass.
5. If the complete gate blocked: Bash `harnessed checkpoint fail verify-design --failing-tests <n>` to record the attempt. It prints `BUDGET-EXHAUSTED` / `NO-PROGRESS` / `BREAK-LOOP` once a stop condition is reached. Respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired; any one of them means STOP — re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user.

<!-- harnessed-generated:v4.12.0 -->

## References

- D-04 Stage ④ Verify 7 sub 分解
- D-12 gstack 治理关卡可选
- workflows/judgments/web-design-routing.yaml — 两段式 ui-ux-pro-max 结构 → design-taste-frontend 打磨
- workflows/capabilities.yaml — gstack-design-review / ui-ux-pro-max / design-taste-frontend
- workflows/verify/auto/workflow.yaml — `design` delegate gate = 同一个 design-review-post trigger
- workflows/verify-work/workflow.yaml v2 SHIPPED phase 07-design-review-conditional sister verbatim

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • workflow.yaml1.7 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.