Stage ① Discuss master orchestrator — 3 sub-workflow parallel gate-eval (chain-isolation 铁律)。 战略层 / Phase 层 / 子任务层独立判断 gate, 可能 3 个全跑 / 1-2 个 / 全跳 + 透明声明。 schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with delegates_to (3 sub: strategic + phase + subtask, mode parallel) + disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available (planning-with-files)。 Triggered by slash command `/discuss` (bare per ADR 0030 namespace policy D-02 LOCK) after `harnessed setup`.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add easyinplay/harnessed --skill auto --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Auto?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/easyinplay-auto-harnessed)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: discuss
description: |
Stage ① Discuss master orchestrator — 3 sub-workflow parallel gate-eval (chain-isolation 铁律)。
战略层 / Phase 层 / 子任务层独立判断 gate, 可能 3 个全跑 / 1-2 个 / 全跳 + 透明声明。
schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with delegates_to (3 sub: strategic + phase + subtask, mode parallel)
+ disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available (planning-with-files)。
Triggered by slash command `/discuss`
(bare per ADR 0030 namespace policy D-02 LOCK) after `harnessed setup`.
trigger_phrases:
- "discuss"
- "讨论澄清"
- "新功能澄清"
- "stage 1 discuss"
- "三层澄清"
---
# discuss master orchestrator (v3)
## Overview
4-stage cadence Stage ① master orchestrator delegating to 3 independent sub-workflows
(bundled 3-tier independent clarification: strategic / phase / subtask):
| sub | gate ref | mode | when fires |
| --- | -------- | ---- | ---------- |
| `strategic` | `judgments.strategic-gate.strategic-tier-delegate.fires` | parallel | new_project / new_milestone / new_feature / is_major_release |
| `phase` | `judgments.phase-gate.gsd-discuss-phase.fires` | parallel | open_decisions ≥ 2 / cross_phase_data_flow / scope_days > 1 / files_touched > 5 |
| `subtask` | `judgments.subtask-gate.brainstorming.fires` | parallel | approaches ≥ 2 / core_algorithm / has_api_contract / error_cost=high |
Engine runtime spawns 3 sub-workflow phases via `runMasterOrchestrator` per
T3.5.W0.1 (sister sub-workflow `runWorkflow` SDK pattern, parallel fan-out via
subagent default — Path A `query()` parallel OR Path B sub-shell fallback per
T3.5.W2.1 dogfood cycle decision LOCK)。
## Chain-isolation 铁律 (sister CLAUDE.md "Fallback 三条铁律")
- 拿不准 → 倾向跳过, 但在响应里**透明声明**: "这次跳过了 X, 因为 Y。如果你认为需要请明说"
- 用户明示 → 覆盖判据 (用户说 "先 brainstorm" / "跑 office-hours" / "讨论一下" 时无条件激活)
- **链式互不前置**: 跳过战略层 ≠ 必须跳过 phase 层; 每层独立判断 (防止 "上层没跑下层不敢跑" 的死板)
## Capability refs
Sister `workflows/capabilities.yaml`:
- `planning-with-files` — Bucket 4 核心 capability (impl: claude-code-plugin, cmd: /plan, discuss sink findings.md)
- sub `strategic` upstream → `gstack-office-hours` + `gstack-plan-ceo-review`
- sub `phase` upstream → `gsd-discuss-phase`
- sub `subtask` upstream → `superpowers-brainstorming` + `grill-with-docs` + `grill-me`
## Invocation
- Slash command: `/discuss <text>` (bare per ADR 0030 namespace policy D-02 LOCK after `harnessed setup`)
## How to invoke
Clarification needs real user dialogue, so run this stage directly in THIS session — do NOT
spawn it, and do NOT improvise: follow these steps so the locked spec is persisted for the
execution stages.
0. **New-project bootstrap** — if `.planning/ROADMAP.md` does not exist: invoke `/gsd-new-project` when that skill is available; otherwise create the minimal skeleton before continuing (then phase dirs follow `.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/`):
- `ROADMAP.md`: `# Roadmap` + one table row per phase: `| 01 | <slug> | <one-line goal> | in-progress |`
- `STATE.md`: `# STATE (digest — keep <100 lines)` + `current: phase 01-<slug> / stage discuss` + `next: <action>`
- `REQUIREMENTS.md`: `# Requirements` + numbered rows `- R1: <verifiable acceptance criterion>`
1. Evaluate the clarification criteria for "$ARGUMENTS":
- **Strategic** — new feature / milestone / unclear business scope → gstack `/office-hours` + `/plan-ceo-review`
- **Phase** — ≥2 open implementation decisions / unclear cross-phase API contract → GSD `/gsd-discuss-phase`
- **Subtask** — ≥2 distinct approaches / core algorithm / API contract design / high error cost → superpowers brainstorming
2. For each layer that fires, hold the dialogue with the user (use AskUserQuestion for option-style decisions) and lock every open decision. After locking blocking decisions, relay the deferrable set to the user in a single batched AskUserQuestion with each agent-recommended default pre-selected — only skip an item if the user explicitly defers it again; a deferrable item is never resolved without the user seeing it.
3. Transparent-skip layers that don't fire — state which were skipped and why.
4. Persist the locked decisions to `.planning/phases/<NN>-<slug>/` via planning-with-files (`findings.md` / `task_plan.md`; NN = two-digit, one above the highest existing phase dir).
Output: a locked spec the execution stages (`/plan` → `/task` → `/verify`) consume without further user input.
<!-- harnessed-generated:v4.12.0 -->
## References
- D-01 master orchestrator delegation pattern
- D-02 bare slash cmd convention (ADR 0030 namespace policy LOCK)
- D-04 Stage ① Discuss 三层独立判
- workflows/judgments/stage-routing.yaml — discuss-{strategic,phase,subtask}-delegate triggers
- workflows/discuss/{strategic,phase,subtask}/workflow.yaml — 3 sub-workflow Phase 3.4 SHIPPED
- workflows/judgments/fallback.yaml — 链式互不前置 chain-isolation 铁律
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!