Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) with Codex doing the implementation passes while you orchestrate, integrate, and review. Use when the user asks to implement a spec with Codex, or to run implement-spec with Codex as the implementer.
Scanned 9/29/2026
npx -y skills add dzhng/jevgrep --skill implement-spec-with-codex --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Implement Spec With Codex?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dzhng-implement-spec-with-codex-jevgrep)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: implement-spec-with-codex
description: Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) with Codex doing the implementation passes while you orchestrate, integrate, and review. Use when the user asks to implement a spec with Codex, or to run implement-spec with Codex as the implementer.
---
# Implement Spec with Codex
Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) exactly — same loop, same
gates, same maintenance checkpoints — but Codex writes the code. Invoking this
skill IS the explicit ask that authorizes `codex exec` delegation under the
[codex](../codex/SKILL.md) skill.
## Role split
- **Codex implements — whenever possible.** Default every implementation pass
to a `codex exec`, sliced sharp and prompted per the codex skill (prompt
blocks, sandbox choice, exec liveness). Run independent slices as concurrent
execs in separate worktrees, exactly where implement-spec would fan out
subagents.
- **You orchestrate and review.** The spec loop stays yours: pick the next
slice, reconcile plan with code, author each prompt end-to-end, integrate
diffs, run the gates, review the merged tree, commit,
update the handoff, run maintenance checkpoints. None of that delegates.
Keep a pass yourself only when slicing it sharply would cost more than doing
it — tiny fixups, plan reconciliation, integration conflicts.
## Rules
- You own every result: read the full diff and run the verification yourself.
"Codex says it's done" is never done.
- Visual results carry implement-spec's two extra proofs (production-route
pixel diff + unprimed critique) with double force here: a sandboxed Codex
never saw its change render, so a pass that misses the production render
path entirely arrives looking fully "verified".
- A sandboxed Codex ships code it never saw run — browser-verify every visual
slice yourself and budget fix rounds. Send a red gate back as a resumed
follow-up with the failing evidence; fix it yourself only when that's
smaller than re-prompting.
- Commit hygiene stays yours: review the change list of the merged tree
before every commit, exactly as implement-spec demands of the integrating
reviewer.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!