Improve agent reliability over time — diagnose why agents fail and fix the setup. Triggers on: agent keeps failing, same mistake again, agent not improving, make agent smarter, agent quality plateau, agents ignore skills, agent skips tests, fix agent behavior, agent unreliable, improve agent setup, self-improving harness, agents worse over time, tune agent instructions, agent going in circles, agent ignores AGENTS.md, repeated agent errors. Requires harness v0 and eval harness. AUTO-ROUTED fr...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add dvy1987/agent-loom --skill harness-evolution --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Harness Evolution?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dvy1987-harness-evolution)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: harness-evolution
description: >
Improve agent reliability over time — diagnose why agents fail and fix the setup.
Triggers on: agent keeps failing, same mistake again, agent not improving, make
agent smarter, agent quality plateau, agents ignore skills, agent skips tests,
fix agent behavior, agent unreliable, improve agent setup, self-improving
harness, agents worse over time, tune agent instructions, agent going in
circles, agent ignores AGENTS.md, repeated agent errors. Requires harness v0
and eval harness. AUTO-ROUTED from harness-engineering on symptoms. Not first
setup — harness-generation first.
license: MIT
metadata:
author: dvy1987
version: "1.2"
category: project-specific
sources: >
AHE arXiv:2604.25850, Self-Harness arXiv:2606.09498, HarnessFix arXiv:2606.06324,
RHO arXiv:2606.05922, auto-harness, metaharness
resources:
references:
- evolution-loop.md
- diagnosis-etclovg.md
- examples.md
---
# Harness Evolution
You close the harness improvement loop: **execute → trace → diagnose layer → propose
minimal edit → regression validate → promote or reject**. Model weights are out of scope.
## Hard Rules
Never run an evolution round without **harness vN manifest** and **operational eval harness**.
Never propose an edit without trace evidence tied to a failure cluster.
Never accept an edit without regression gate: held-in Δ ≥ 0 AND held-out Δ ≥ 0 AND max(Δ) > 0 (Self-Harness).
Never make outcome-only edits — attribute failure to an ETCLOVG layer first (HarnessFix).
Never allow evolve agent to modify verifier config, eval held-out tasks, or LLM API keys (AHE sandbox).
Never promote prompt-only changes when tools/middleware/skills are the diagnosed layer (AHE ablation).
Never bypass file-scope guard — edits only to paths declared in manifest `allowed_write`.
---
## Workflow
### Step 0 — Preconditions (mandatory)
Verify:
1. `docs/harness/manifest.json` exists (else → `harness-generation`).
2. `docs/harness/eval-interface.md` + regression task set defined (else → `eval-rubric-design` → `eval-pipeline`).
3. Held-out split documented — **never fed to proposer** (Self-Harness, Meta-Harness).
FAIL fast with specific route if any missing.
### Step 1 — Capture traces
Collect from: benchmark runs, `docs/memory/agent-handoffs.md`, session logs, or
`docs/harness/runs/iteration_NNN/`. Distill to layered digest per AHE experience observability —
raw millions of tokens are not fed to the proposer.
### Step 2 — Diagnose (ETCLOVG + HTIR)
Per `references/diagnosis-etclovg.md`:
- Normalize traces to step-level nodes (HarnessFix HTIR pattern).
- Attribute each failure cluster to one primary layer: Execution, Tooling, Context,
Lifecycle, Observability, Verification, Governance.
- Consolidate recurring flaws into actionable records — one mechanism per record.
### Step 3 — Propose diverse-minimal candidates
Generate K candidate edits (default K=3), each:
- Tied to **one** failure mechanism (Self-Harness).
- Scoped to manifest `allowed_write` paths (metaharness scope guard).
- Documented with **evidence quad** (AHE): failure evidence, root cause, targeted fix, predicted impact.
Write `docs/harness/evolve/change_manifest.json` before evaluation.
### Step 4 — Regression validate
Invoke `eval-pipeline` (harness regression mode) on held-in + held-out splits.
| Gate | Rule |
|------|------|
| Self-Harness acceptance | held-in Δ ≥ 0 AND held-out Δ ≥ 0 AND improvement > 0 |
| Scope | No files outside `allowed_write` |
| No-change | Zero file changes → inherit parent scores, do not promote (metaharness) |
| pass@1 | Optimize pass@1, not pass@k flaky strategies (AHE) |
### Step 5 — Promote or reject
**Accept:** bump manifest version to vN+1, update hashes, archive run under `docs/harness/runs/`.
**Reject:** log predicted-vs-actual in manifest; if same flaw persists 2+ rounds at same layer → rollback component and pivot layer (AHE).
Optional **label-free path** (RHO): when no labeled eval exists, use self-consistency +
pairwise self-preference among candidates — still require positive mean score before promote.
### Step 6 — Memory + handoff
On promote: `memory-capture` with harness version, delta metrics, and changed components.
Append `docs/skill-outputs/SKILL-OUTPUTS.md`.
---
## Gotchas
- **Compressed feedback loses credit assignment** — never reduce traces to scalar score only (Meta-Harness).
- **Runtime supervision patches** suppress errors without fixing harness flaws — reject as edits (HarnessFix).
- **Self-attribution misses regressions** — manifest must list `risk_tasks` predicted to break (AHE).
- **Generic prompt bloat** — every instruction must map to a diagnosed failure cluster.
- **Label-free RHO is fallback** — prefer verifier-backed regression when labels exist.
---
## Output Format
```
Harness evolution — round [N]
Diagnosed layer: [ETCLOVG]
Candidates: [K] | Accepted: [id or none]
Held-in Δ: [x] | Held-out Δ: [y]
Promoted: v[N] → v[N+1] | [rejected — reason]
Changed components: [list]
Next: [another round | reality-check claim audit]
```
---
## Example
<examples>
<example>
<input>Agent keeps retrying the same failing tool call — improve the harness.</input>
<output>
Harness evolution — round 1
Diagnosed layer: Tooling (F6 tool-use loop)
Candidates: 3 | Accepted: candidate-2 (middleware retry cap + alternate tool path)
Held-in Δ: +2 | Held-out Δ: +1
Promoted: v0 → v1 | Changed: docs/harness/middleware.md, tool descriptions
</output>
</example>
</examples>
## Common Rationalizations
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Skip eval — vibes say it's better" | No regression gate = unfalsifiable (reality-check) |
| "Fix in the prompt only" | AHE: prompt-only regresses; fix diagnosed layer |
| "Use test failures as held-out" | Contaminates proposer — splits are sacred |
| "One big harness rewrite" | Diverse-minimal proposals beat monolithic edits |
| "Evolve without manifest" | No attribution, no rollback |
## Verification
- [ ] Preconditions verified (manifest + eval harness + held-out split)
- [ ] Failure attributed to ETCLOVG layer with trace refs
- [ ] change_manifest.json with evidence quad
- [ ] Regression run via eval-pipeline
- [ ] Promotion only if dual-split rule passes
## Red Flags
- Evolution round without eval harness
- Held-out tasks leaked to proposer
- Scope violations in edited files
- Prompt bloat without failure mapping
## Prune Log
Last pruned: 2026-07-05
- Deep learn-from: evolution-loop, diagnosis-etclovg, examples L3 (5 papers + 5 repos)
## Impact Report
```
Harness evolution round [N]: [accepted|rejected]
Layer: [ETCLOVG] | v[N]→v[N+1]
Held-out Δ: [x] | Components changed: [list]
eval-pipeline: [run id]
```
## Reference Files
- `references/evolution-loop.md` — full loop, auto-harness 3-step gate, filesystem artifact store
- `references/diagnosis-etclovg.md` — HTIR nodes, layer attribution, flaw records
- `references/examples.md` — accept, reject, and RHO fallback examples
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!