Imagine the project already failed, then work backward to find why. More powerful than risk assessment because it assumes failure is certain. Use when user says \"pre-mortem\", \"premortem\", \"imagine this failed\", \"what could go wrong\", \"risk analysis\", \"before we launch\", \"stress test\", \"what would kill this\", \"project risks\".
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add dvcrn/openclaw-skills-marketplace --skill pre-mortem-analyst --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pre Mortem Analyst?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dvcrn-pre-mortem-analyst)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: pre-mortem-analyst
description: "Imagine the project already failed, then work backward to find why. More powerful than risk assessment because it assumes failure is certain. Use when user says \"pre-mortem\", \"premortem\", \"imagine this failed\", \"what could go wrong\", \"risk analysis\", \"before we launch\", \"stress test\", \"what would kill this\", \"project risks\"."
---
# Pre-Mortem Analyst
## Why Pre-Mortem > Risk Assessment
**Risk Assessment:** "What MIGHT go wrong?" → Optimism bias filters answers
**Pre-Mortem:** "It's 6 months later. It FAILED. Why?" → Liberates honest analysis
Research: Pre-mortems increase problem identification by 30%.
## The Process
1. **Set the scene:** "It's [date]. This has failed completely."
2. **Brainstorm causes:** List 10+ failure reasons (no filtering)
3. **Categorize:** People, Process, Technology, External
4. **Rate:** Likelihood × Impact (H/M/L)
5. **Prevent:** Top 3 get specific mitigation actions
6. **Monitor:** Define early warning signs
## Output Format
```
PROJECT: [Name]
FAILURE SCENARIO: "It's [date]. [Project] has completely failed."
WHY IT FAILED:
👥 PEOPLE: [Cause] - L×I: H/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
⚙️ PROCESS: [Cause] - L×I: M/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
💻 TECHNOLOGY: [Cause] - L×I: L/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
🌍 EXTERNAL: [Cause] - L×I: M/M | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
TOP 3 PRIORITIES:
1. [Risk] → [Specific action]
2. [Risk] → [Specific action]
3. [Risk] → [Specific action]
WARNING SIGNS TO MONITOR:
□ [Early indicator 1]
□ [Early indicator 2]
```
## Common Failure Categories
| Category | Common Causes |
|----------|---------------|
| **People** | Key person leaves, skill gaps, misalignment, low buy-in |
| **Process** | Aggressive timeline, scope creep, dependency issues |
| **Tech** | Doesn't scale, integration fails, security breach |
| **External** | Market shift, competitor move, regulation change |
## Integration
Compounds with:
- **inversion-strategist** → Create systematic avoidance strategies
- **second-order-consequences** → Project impact of prevented failures
- **first-principles-decomposer** → Question hidden assumptions
- **mspot-generator** → Validate MSPOT projects before committing
---
See references/examples.md for Artem-specific pre-mortems
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!