Skip to content
Back to skills

Workflow Spec To Pbi

ASecurity

[Workflow] Use when converting canonical feature/spec artifacts into prioritized, dependency-aware PBIs and stories.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 9, 2026
businessgobackendsecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 5, 2026

npx -y skills add duc01226/easy-claude --skill workflow-spec-to-pbi --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Workflow Spec To Pbi?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Workflow Spec To Pbi
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/duc01226-workflow-spec-to-pbi-easy-claude/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/duc01226-workflow-spec-to-pbi-easy-claude)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: workflow-spec-to-pbi
version: 3.0.0
description: '[Workflow] Use when converting canonical feature/spec artifacts into prioritized, dependency-aware PBIs and stories.'
disable-model-invocation: false
---

## Quick Summary

**Goal:** Convert existing canonical specs into a complete, dependency-ordered, prioritized, Definition-of-Ready PBI/story backlog — no implementation — with depth proportional to the spec's size and risk.

**Purpose:** For PO/BA teams that already have canonical specs (one capability or a whole bucket) and need sprint-ready PBIs, including splitting a very large spec and identifying enabling work. Use `workflow-idea-to-spec` when no spec exists yet, `workflow-idea-to-pbi` for one informal idea, `workflow-code-to-spec` to create/update specs from code, `workflow-feature` / `workflow-big-feature` to build ready PBIs.

- **Triage first** (capability count · kinds · freshness risk · `isLargeIdea`); it selects which recommended skills run. A 1–3 capability spec with no domain change skips the plan cycle, scenario and domain analysis.
- **Gates never flex:** coverage, spec clarity, releasable outcome, artifact review, independent challenge, DoR, UI full-flow evidence, priority propagation, docs sync, close.
- **[BLOCKING] Tech-agnostic output:** PBI / backlog / report prose follows `spec-principles.md` §3 in the project-reference docs root (default `docs/project-reference/`; `docsRoots.projectReference.path` in `docs/project-config.json` overrides) — implementation names appear only in evidence fields, frontmatter and Mermaid.
- Apply `.claude/skills/shared/sdd-artifact-contract.md` (AI-SDD Mandates M1-M7), `.claude/skills/shared/releasable-pbi-contract.md` and `.claude/skills/shared/product-roadmap-contract.md`.

## Canonical Input Profile

Before loading or mapping a spec, read `docs/project-config.json` (`specRoots.business.path`, `workflowPatterns.featureDocTemplate`, `docsRoots.projectReference.path`, `specArtifacts` when declared), the configured template and the local `spec-system-reference.md` / `spec-principles.md`. Use the native paths, section roles, identifier formats, ownership model and evidence/test carriers they declare; code stays the technical source of truth and the canonical spec the requirements source — never create a second engineering-spec plane.

- The portable `{Bucket}/README.{Feature}.md` tech-free 8-section spec (§3 US/AC, §4 BR, §5 ERD, §6 flows, §7 permissions, §8 `TC-` cases) is the fallback ONLY when neither a native profile nor a local artifact contract applies.
- Carry native requirement, acceptance, rule and scenario IDs as the PRIMARY citation spine and declared evidence carriers as secondary traceability; never translate them into `FR-`/`BR-`, mint new IDs, synthesize a missing section or duplicate a case registry.
- A missing/ambiguous spec path or owner → ask for the exact configured path. An unknown role, owner or test-evidence mapping is `UNKNOWN` and blocks that mapping — never treat it as absent or green.

## Triage — FIRST Action

Classify before choosing steps; write the result as the first section of the run report.

1. **Scale** — **1–3 capabilities**: inline, one task per capability and feature group · **4–10**: split by capability, then feature/operation group · **10+**: capability-group batches with coverage-matrix checkpoints. Any PBI over 8 story points splits (SPIDR) until ≤ 8.
2. **Kinds** — new/changed entities, lifecycle or state transitions, cross-service ownership, data migration or seed needs (domain) · user-facing UI surface · implementation already exists (freshness risk) · security/PII/money.
3. **Large spec** — evaluate `isLargeIdea`. True → read the complete `large_idea_decomposition` block (`outcome_slices`, `dependencies_order`, `non_goals`, `risks_evidence`, `deferred_work_owner`) from the role the native profile or local reference declares for slice plans and carry its stable slice IDs through every PBI, story, mockup and the all-PBI deck; if no role permits slice plans, mark the owner `UNKNOWN` and stop decomposition until resolved. All-false → omit the block and roadmap fields. Never create the product-roadmap artifact (default `docs/product-roadmap.md`; `docsRoots.productRoadmap.path` in `docs/project-config.json` overrides); a supplied roadmap is read-only context.
4. **Risk & ambiguity** escalate depth (plan cycle, scenario), not spec length.

## Required Quality Gates (non-negotiable)

| Gate                      | Evidence                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| ------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Triage recorded           | scale, kinds, freshness risk, `isLargeIdea` verdict in the run report                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Source freshness known    | `/spec [mode=index]` audit result, or the cited reason no implementation exists to drift from; stale critical domain/contract/business-rule sections stop PBI generation until the user decides whether to update specs first                                                                                                                                                           |
| Coverage                  | coverage matrix (`Spec Source · Capability · Feature/Operation · Domain Impact · Shared Dependency · PBI Type · Status`) maps every source feature/operation to exactly one of: generated releasable PBI · enabling task attached to a releasable PBI · existing PBI reference · out-of-scope with reason                                                                        |
| Spec clarity              | `/spec [mode=clarify]` (gate) confirms every non-obvious, conflicting or high-impact decomposition decision with the user before any PBI is built; confirmed material changes route through `/spec [mode=update]` — it never re-authors the spec                                                                                                                                        |
| Releasable outcome        | every PBI is one independently releasable actor-facing outcome with a complete entry-to-result journey; enabling/foundation/migration/setup work is attached and ordered before what it enables, never a standalone PBI                                                                                                                                                          |
| M1-M5, M7                 | acceptance criteria are tech-agnostic, observable, single-interpretation GIVEN/WHEN/THEN; M7 demo test on each criterion's BODY — `Given` a state a user can arrange, `When` an action a user can take, `Then` an outcome a user can see; an invocation `When` or a schema/type/call-count `Then` fails as TECHNICAL-ONLY; AC count never derives from an architecture inventory |
| Rationale reviewed        | `/why-review` on the domain/decomposition rationale is PASS, or WARN with user acknowledgment                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Artifact review converged | `/pbi --mode=review --type=pbi` (gate) and the story review: validated blocking findings fixed and re-reviewed                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Independent challenge     | `/pbi --mode=challenge` run by a reviewer other than the drafter                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Definition of Ready       | `/pbi --mode=dor` PASS or WARN for every PBI                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| UI evidence               | UI PBIs: navigable mock app covering every required page/view, navigation edge, component, state, story and the full flow, plus `/design-spec`; one isolated screen fails. Backend-only: stated skip reason                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Priority propagation      | every PBI carries `priority:` + numeric rank in frontmatter (`/prioritize` ranks all generated PBIs once and writes it into EACH PBI; with exactly one PBI and no backlog ranking requested, refine's frontmatter priority stands); mockup header and deck show the final value |
| Docs synced               | `/docs-manager --mode=update` confirms canonical specs, their test/evidence carriers and project-declared derived indexes are updated or explicitly unchanged                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Run closed                | `/workflow-end`, then `/watzup` handoff                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

No code changes here: the test-green gate does not apply.

## Recommended Skills

Skipping a step whose applicability is false, or that triage shows does no real work, is expected — log it (`when-false` / `intent-skip`) with evidence.

| Skill                                                                                                              | Earns its cost when                                                                                                                                           | Feeds                   |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- |
| `/investigate`                                                                                                     | always — locate canonical specs, catalog/index, related code                                                                                                  | input profile, coverage |
| `/spec [mode=index]` (audit)                                                                                              | implementation exists or the spec was not synced against code this session                                                                                    | freshness               |
| `/domain-analysis`                                                                                                 | a spec item implies new/changed entities, lifecycle, ownership boundaries or data migration; findings go under each affected PBI's `## Domain Impact`         | domain impact           |
| `/why-review`                                                                                                      | always — challenge the domain/decomposition rationale before clarification                                                                                    | rationale gate          |
| `/spec [mode=clarify]`                                                                                                    | always (gate)                                                                                                                                                 | spec clarity            |
| `/scenario`                                                                                                        | slice risks need adversarial replay, state, ownership, recovery or evidence analysis; map proof to a PBI and native test-evidence ID or `deferred_work_owner` | risk coverage           |
| `/plan` → `/plan --mode=validate`                                                                                         | large spec, 4+ capabilities or cross-capability dependencies                                                                                                  | slicing and order       |
| `/pbi --mode=refine`, `/pbi --mode=review --type=pbi`, `/pbi --mode=story`, `/pbi --mode=review --type=story`, `/pbi --mode=challenge`, `/pbi --mode=dor` | always, per coverage-matrix row that needs a new PBI                                                                                                          | review, challenge, DoR  |
| `/pbi --mode=mockup` → `/design-spec`                                                                                     | the PBI has a user-facing UI surface; both gated by `SYNC:existing-ui-research`                                                                               | UI evidence             |
| `/prioritize`                                                                                                      | more than one PBI was generated, or the PBI must be ranked against an existing backlog; otherwise refine's frontmatter priority stands |
| `/docs-manager --mode=update`                                                                                                     | always, after prioritize                                                                                                                                      | docs synced             |
| `/feature-presentation`                                                                                            | several PBIs, large spec, or stakeholders asked for a deck — then the Scope & backlog slide shows each PBI's rank                                             | stakeholder handoff     |

**Spec-hub coupling (UI PBIs):** the mockup and design-spec are companions of the interaction-intent owner the native profile or local contract declares; link them where the contract has a carrier (fallback: §6 surface and `design_spec:` / `mockup:` frontmatter). If the native spec has no interaction section or link carrier, keep the separate design spec and flag the missing relationship — never invent a numbered section.

**The PBI half matches `workflow-idea-to-pbi`:** PBI review → stories → challenge → DoR → mockup → design-spec → prioritize (conditional) → docs-manager --mode=update → deck. Reuse handoffs match too: `/pbi --mode=challenge --reuse=pbi-review` and `/pbi --mode=dor --reuse=pbi-review` consume the `/pbi --mode=review --type=pbi` report while the PBI is unchanged (drop the flag after any PBI edit; standalone runs evaluate every check), and `/design-spec` reuses the mockup's Journey Report.

## Outputs

Paths are relative to the team-artifacts root (default `team-artifacts/`; `docsRoots.teamArtifacts.path` in `docs/project-config.json` overrides).

- `pbis/{date}-pbi-{slug}.md` per PBI — native ID citations, `file:section` evidence, GIVEN/WHEN/THEN AC, story points and complexity, dependencies (`must-before` / `can-parallel` / `blocked-by` / `independent`), priority input, test/evidence needs mapped to the declared carrier, domain impact, enabling-task references, Releasable Outcome Gate evidence (actor, outcome, journey, visible/persisted truth, access/failure/recovery, non-goals), UI inventory or no-UI reason, and `priority` frontmatter.
- `pbis/{slug}-mockup.html` and `design-specs/{date}-designspec-{slug}.md` per UI PBI.
- `backlog/spec-to-pbi-{date}-backlog.md` — rank and recommended order, dependency graph, first-do/blocked/defer groups, enabling work ordered with the PBIs it enables, RICE or MoSCoW rationale, DoR status per PBI, open questions.
- The `/feature-presentation` deck when it runs, and `tmp/reports/spec-to-pbi-{date}-{bucket}.md` with the coverage matrix and unresolved questions.

## Orchestration, Memory & Fix Path

- **Orchestration freedom:** choose inline vs sub-agent, batching and order to minimize wall-clock and tokens at equal quality; 1–3 capabilities run inline; 10+ capabilities run in bounded capability-group batches, one report section per batch. Fixed dependencies: freshness and clarification precede decomposition; a PBI exists before it is reviewed; `/prioritize` runs once after every PBI loop finishes; `/docs-manager --mode=update` follows it; gates awaiting user answers are never parallelized; `/workflow-end` runs last. When `/prioritize` changes a rank after a mockup was built, refresh the mockup's priority badge.
- **Memory:** one task per selected step (per capability group when batched). Create `tmp/reports/spec-to-pbi-{date}-{bucket}.md` first, append after each capability/feature, and re-read it plus `TaskList` after compaction; never hold all PBIs in memory. Sub-agent briefs make report writing their first deliverable.
- **Fix path:** findings are validated before fixing; fix in the owning artifact (`/pbi --mode=refine` for the PBI, `/pbi --mode=story` for stories, `/spec [mode=update]` for confirmed spec changes) and re-run the reviewer that raised it.
- **Loop bounds:** round 1 zero open findings (Round-1 LOW closure), or round 2 zero CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM with LOWs deferred; cap 3 review rounds; on no progress escalate via `AskUserQuestion`.

---

**IMPORTANT MANDATORY Steps:** /investigate -> /spec [mode=index] -> /domain-analysis -> /why-review -> /spec [mode=clarify] -> /scenario -> /plan -> /plan --mode=validate -> /pbi --mode=refine -> /pbi --mode=review --type=pbi -> /pbi --mode=story -> /pbi --mode=review --type=story -> /pbi --mode=challenge --reuse=pbi-review -> /pbi --mode=dor --reuse=pbi-review -> /pbi --mode=mockup -> /design-spec -> /prioritize -> /docs-manager --mode=update -> /feature-presentation -> /workflow-end -> /watzup

**Step contract:** the list above is the recommended default order from `.claude/workflows.json`; steps follow `/start-workflow` → Step Execution Protocol — `gate` steps (`spec [mode=clarify]`, `pbi --mode=review --type=pbi`, `pbi --mode=dor`, `workflow-end`) always run, `optional` steps run when their `applicability.when` holds, and every skip, merge, simplification or reorder is logged with evidence. NEVER batch-complete validation gates.

Activate with `/start-workflow workflow-spec-to-pbi` and the user's prompt as context.

<!-- PROTOCOL-GUIDES:START -->

> **Protocol guides** — A hook delivers each protocol's full text when this skill loads. If a protocol's text is not in your context, read its file below before you act on it.

- `incremental-persistence` — Persist results per file or section while the work proceeds; a sub-agent or heavy step processes more than three files → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/incremental-persistence.md
- `session-goal-ledger` — Keep the original goal and every user prompt of the session; running a long or multi-prompt session → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/session-goal-ledger.md
- `subagent-return-contract` — Sub-agents return a structured envelope and a report path, never an inline report; spawning a sub-agent → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/subagent-return-contract.md
- `ui-intent-layer` — Tech-agnostic UI intent layer in every UI-bearing spec; writing a spec for a feature with a user interface → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/ui-intent-layer.md
- `workflow-registry-binding` — Read the workflow registry entry and the workflow skill together, since they must agree; executing or editing a workflow → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/workflow-registry-binding.md

<!-- PROTOCOL-GUIDES:END -->


<!-- SYNC:ui-intent-layer:reminder -->

- **MANDATORY** For UI-bearing specs, author/maintain the tech-agnostic interaction-surface layer (views with information priority now/later/not-here and container role + navigation map + observable states + user-action flows), resolving it through the configured profile's intent/evidence roles and logical IDs; an unresolved owner, role, ID, carrier, or link stays `UNKNOWN`/`BLOCKED`. **Strict portable fallback — only when neither config nor local references declares a native artifact contract:** trace each flow to the default `US-`/`OP-`/`BR-` IDs and record the companion artifact in the `design_spec:`/`mockup:` frontmatter keys. Name ZERO frameworks/routes/CSS/component classes; skip ONLY for backend-only features with a stated reason.

<!-- /SYNC:ui-intent-layer:reminder -->

<!-- SYNC:session-goal-ledger:reminder -->

- **MANDATORY** Session goal ledger per the `Task Planning Rules`: pin `Original goal:`, keep `User prompts this session: P1…Pn`, and map the result to every prompt before claiming done; full text: `.claude/skills/shared/protocols/session-goal-ledger.md`.

<!-- /SYNC:session-goal-ledger:reminder -->

## Closing Reminders

**IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Goal:** a complete, dependency-ordered, prioritized, DoR-ready PBI/story backlog from canonical specs — depth proportional to the spec, gates never skipped.

- **MUST ATTENTION** triage first (scale · kinds · freshness · `isLargeIdea`) and record it; skip domain analysis, scenario and the plan cycle only with logged evidence.
- **MUST ATTENTION** keep every gate: coverage matrix, `spec [mode=clarify]`, releasable outcome + M7, `pbi --mode=review --type=pbi`, independent `pbi --mode=challenge`, `pbi --mode=dor`, UI full-flow mock app + design-spec, priority written into every PBI's frontmatter, `docs-manager --mode=update`, `workflow-end`.
- **MUST ATTENTION** carry native IDs as the citation spine; never mint IDs, invent sections or emit a standalone technical PBI.
- **MUST ATTENTION** large specs carry the complete `large_idea_decomposition` block (`outcome_slices` … `deferred_work_owner`); never create a roadmap artifact by default.
- **MUST ATTENTION** one task per selected step, report file first and appended per capability; tech-agnostic prose.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.