Recommends against routine 25(OH)D testing in adults aged 75 years and older. Triggered by questions such as "Should I order a vitamin D level for this patient over 75?" or "Is vitamin D testing indicated for asymptomatic elderly adults?"
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add dromlakhani/MD2SKILL --skill endo-vitd-no-testing-over75 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Endo Vitd No Testing Over75?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dromlakhani-endo-vitd-no-testing-over75)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: endo-vitd-no-testing-over75
description: Recommends against routine 25(OH)D testing in adults aged 75 years and older. Triggered by questions such as "Should I order a vitamin D level for this patient over 75?" or "Is vitamin D testing indicated for asymptomatic elderly adults?"
---
# Against routine vitamin D testing in adults over 75
## STEP 1 — Gather Information
Collect patient age, presence of symptoms or conditions that constitute established indications for 25(OH)D testing (e.g., hypocalcemia, osteoporosis, history of falls/fractures, malabsorption, chronic kidney disease, or current vitamin D supplementation therapy requiring monitoring).
## STEP 2 — Rule In / Rule Out
If patient is <75 years old OR has any established indication for vitamin D testing → consider testing per other guidelines (rule out). If patient is ≥75 years old AND has no established indications for testing → proceed (rule in).
## STEP 3 — Classify or Stratify
Classify as "No routine testing indicated" for all patients meeting rule‑in criteria; further stratification by risk factors (obesity, dark complexion, institutionalization) does not change the recommendation against routine screening.
## STEP 4 — Decide
Do not order a routine 25(OH)D test; if vitamin D supplementation is desired per guideline recommendation 6, prescribe empiric low‑dose supplementation (e.g., 800–1000 IU daily) without prior testing.
## Clinical Guardrails / Mimics / Pitfalls
Do not test solely based on age; do not delay empiric supplementation awaiting test results; do not interpret low 25(OH)D as deficiency in asymptomatic older adults without clinical correlates; avoid testing in patients with hypocalcemia, malabsorption, osteoporosis, or recent fractures—these are indications for testing, not screening.
## Concrete Clinical Example
An 80‑year‑old woman with well‑controlled hypertension asks whether she should have a vitamin D level drawn. She reports no bone pain, falls, fractures, malabsorption, or hypocalcemia, and is not currently taking vitamin D. According to the guideline, routine testing is not recommended; instead, empiric vitamin D supplementation of 800–1000 IU daily may be considered if not already supplementing.
**Source:** Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, Endocrine Society, 2024, DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae290
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!