The skill advises against routine 25(OH)D testing in asymptomatic adults younger than 50 years who lack established indications for vitamin D assessment. It is triggered when a clinician considers ordering a 25(OH)D test for preventive screening in this age group.
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add dromlakhani/MD2SKILL --skill endo-against-25ohd-test-under-50 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Endo Against 25ohd Test Under 50?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dromlakhani-endo-against-25ohd-test-under-50)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: endo-against-25ohd-test-under-50
description: The skill advises against routine 25(OH)D testing in asymptomatic adults younger than 50 years who lack established indications for vitamin D assessment. It is triggered when a clinician considers ordering a 25(OH)D test for preventive screening in this age group.
---
# Against routine 25(OH)D testing in adults under 50
## STEP 1 — Gather Information
Collect patient age, presence of symptoms, and any established indications for 25(OH)D testing (e.g., hypocalcemia, malabsorption syndromes, osteoporosis, pregnancy, chronic kidney disease, or medications affecting vitamin D metabolism). Confirm the patient is under 50 years old, asymptomatic, and has no such indications.
## STEP 2 — Rule In / Rule Out
If the patient is 50 years or older OR has any established indication for 25(OH)D testing, proceed to consider testing per other guidelines; otherwise, rule out routine 25(OH)D testing.
## STEP 3 — Classify or Stratify
Classify the scenario as "routine screening not indicated" when age <50 and asymptomatic without indications; further stratify by noting that subgroups such as obesity, dark complexion, or pregnancy still do not warrant routine testing absent specific clinical indications.
## STEP 4 — Decide
Do not order a routine 25(OH)D test; instead, discuss that empiric vitamin D supplementation is not recommended based on testing results and advise following age-appropriate dietary reference intakes unless other clinical indications arise.
## Clinical Guardrails / Mimics / Pitfalls
Do not use 25(OH)D levels to guide supplementation decisions in this population; avoid testing solely for wellness or preventive screening; be aware that testing may lead to unnecessary supplementation, increased costs, and potential harm from excess vitamin D; note that absence of testing does not preclude addressing symptomatic vitamin D deficiency if clinical signs develop.
## Concrete Clinical Example
A 45-year-old man with fatigue and normal diet requests a 25(OH)D test for "optimal health." He has no symptoms of bone pain, fractures, or known malabsorption. After confirming age <50 and no established indications, the clinician advises against routine testing, explains that empiric supplementation is not recommended without indication, and suggests focusing on balanced diet and sun safety.
**Source:** Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, Endocrine Society, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae290
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!