Debugging as the six geniuses at minute scale — the bug confirmed by a red reproduction before any theory, hypotheses plural with kill-reasons before any fix, the fix proven by a fresh green rerun. Use when something is broken, throwing, failing, flaky, or slow, or when the user asks to debug or diagnose.
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add donald-ada/workinggenius --skill diagnose --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Diagnose?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/donald-ada-diagnose)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: diagnose
description: Debugging as the six geniuses at minute scale — the bug confirmed by a red reproduction before any theory, hypotheses plural with kill-reasons before any fix, the fix proven by a fresh green rerun. Use when something is broken, throwing, failing, flaky, or slow, or when the user asks to debug or diagnose.
---
# Diagnose
A bug is a piece of work whose problem statement nobody confirmed — and debugging fails the way all work fails: at whichever stage got skipped. Read code until a cause feels plausible, fix that, call it done when nothing visibly objects — that is idea straight to implementation with everything between skipped, at minute scale.
The concept: **the six geniuses, run at minute scale — no ceremony, no work file, the same order.**
- **Wonder — the code confirms the problem.** A bug's confirmation line is a red reproduction: one command, run here, that shows the symptom the user reported — red while the bug lives, green when it dies. That command is the code saying "yes, that's it," and until it exists nothing is confirmed and no theory has standing; catching yourself building one first is the stop. A flaky symptom is confirmed by rate — raise the reproduction until signal beats noise. Then shrink the statement: cut inputs, config, and callers one at a time, re-running after each cut, until everything left is load-bearing. The wrong bug reproduced is the wrong problem confirmed.
- **Invention and Discernment — hypotheses are options, and options earn survival.** More than one before testing any: a single hypothesis explored is anchoring with extra steps. Each names its prediction — "if this is the cause, that change turns the reproduction green" — because a hypothesis that predicts nothing can only be believed, never attacked. Attack in rank order, one variable at a time; a dead hypothesis gets its one-line kill-reason, so nobody — including you, an hour from now — walks that path twice.
- **Enablement and Tenacity — red to green, and green is fresh.** The surviving hypothesis becomes a fix proven by the reproduction it was born from, and a regression test at a real seam where one exists — where none does, that absence is a finding about the design, recorded (one line in `.genius/BACKLOG.md`, where the project keeps one, so it gets built instead of remembered), never a license to skip. Close out clean: the rerun fresh, the debug scaffolding gone, the cause stated where the fix is recorded — a fix whose cause is unstated gets un-fixed by the next confident refactor. And what the hunt disproved on the way is corrected where it was written (`errata` skill) — the stated fact the reproduction contradicted, the pinned value that measured differently here; left standing, it is what sends the next session down the path this one just cleared.
Three failed fixes are not a third of the way to nine: they impeach the problem statement. Back to Wonder — question the reproduction, and what it silently assumes.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!