Keep the index of the project's settled decisions in .genius/DECIDED.md — one line per decision, pointing at the fight that settled it, earned by one test: would a future stranger re-fight this? Use when such a decision lands, when a design might contradict a settled one, or when another skill needs the index discipline.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Decision Record?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/donald-ada-decision-record)
---
name: decision-record
description: "Keep the index of the project's settled decisions in .genius/DECIDED.md — one line per decision, pointing at the fight that settled it, earned by one test: would a future stranger re-fight this? Use when such a decision lands, when a design might contradict a settled one, or when another skill needs the index discipline."
---
# The Decision Index
A decision is never written twice. The flow already writes every decision at full strength — kill-reasons, the survivor's fight, the user's confirmation — into the work file where it was made. What those records lack is a door: a fresh session judging a new design cannot trawl every done file for the one decision it is about to contradict. The door is `.genius/DECIDED.md` — one line per settled decision, each pointing at the fight that settled it.
## The line
```markdown
- **Raw SQL over any ORM** — schema drift burned v1; queries are few and
hand-debugged. [The fight](checkout-rework/log/discernment.md#discernment)
```
Verdict in bold, the why in one line, the link relative to `.genius/`. A decision that landed outside the flow — no work file, no battlefield — carries its why in the line itself, one honest sentence rather than a verdict alone.
## The test
An index line is earned by one question: **would a future stranger re-fight this?** — propose the killed thing again, redo the settled study, "fix" the deliberate deviation. Most decisions fail it: they bind only their own work. The ones that pass: architectural shape, boundary no-s, deliberate deviations from the obvious path, constraints invisible in the code, rejections that will be re-proposed by someone who wasn't there. And a seam or convention a slice established that later work will build against — close-out asks the test of the contract's established layer first, block by block, because a builder in the next work re-derives whatever no line lets it find.
## The discipline
- **Written when the record is finished**, because the line points at a fight, and a fight the work can still reopen or abandon is not yet settled. Tenacity's close-out asks the test of everything the work settled; a standalone `/architect` study writes its line when the design is confirmed; a decision that landed outside the flow writes its line when it lands, because there the line *is* the record. Never a second write-up: the line points, the record carries.
- **Read before contradicting, and before introducing.** The index is the ammunition `/discern` and `/architect` load: a design that touches a settled decision either dies of the fight on record or names the decision it overturns and why. It is also where an inventor or a builder looks before introducing a seam or a convention, and reuses the one it finds.
- **Overturning moves the line.** A new fight that beats a settled decision rewrites its line — new verdict, new link — and the old record stays as written. The index carries what the project believes now; the files carry how it came to believe it.
Not a second place decisions get written — a line that restates the fight will drift from it. Not a diary: a decision that fails the stranger test gets no line, and that is the discipline working.