Skip to content
Back to skills

Ddw Family Impact

ASecurity

The impact analysis a family repo owes before leaving CLASSIFY: gathers the whole family fresh (cloning missing members via gh, reading every seam at origin), you write the verdict — every member impacted or excluded with a reason — and validation earns the receipt the CLASSIFY→DEFINE gate demands. Trigger: /ddw-family-impact, and once per ticket in any repo that declares `## Repo family`.

  • 13 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added October 12, 2026
ai-agentspythonbash

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 12, 2026

npx -y skills add DiluxOne/dilux-agentic-workflow --skill ddw-family-impact --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ddw Family Impact?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ddw Family Impact
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diluxone-ddw-family-impact/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diluxone-ddw-family-impact)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ddw-family-impact
description: >
  The impact analysis a family repo owes before leaving CLASSIFY: gathers the whole family fresh
  (cloning missing members via gh, reading every seam at origin), you write the verdict — every
  member impacted or excluded with a reason — and validation earns the receipt the
  CLASSIFY→DEFINE gate demands. Trigger: /ddw-family-impact, and once per ticket in any repo
  that declares `## Repo family`.
---

# Skill: /ddw-family-impact

## Description

Standing in ANY repo of a family, classification's first duty is the impact question: which
members does this work hit, and which does it provably not. This skill is that step. Its
deterministic half is `family_impact.py`; the judgment half is yours.

A repo with no `## Repo family` section never needs this: single-repo flow, untouched.

## Protocol

1. **Gather the facts** (script, not memory):

   ```bash
   python3 .ddw/scripts/family_impact.py --ticket <TICKET>
   ```

   It resolves the family from this repo's `## Repo family` and **reads the workspace and
   every member at their default branch from the forge — cloning nothing**: the map
   (`ddw-family.md`) and every member's seams, freshness by construction, each repo recorded at
   the SHA it was read and with HOW it was read (`forge`, or a sibling clone that already
   existed and was fetched — the offline fallback). The facts land in
   `.ddw-work/impact-data-<TICKET>.json`. **When the workspace carries a derived store**
   (`docs/ddw/store/renglones.md`), each member arrives with its renglón and the commit that
   row was written at — a row behind the repo is reported, not hidden, and never blocks: the
   analysis happens over facts that say how old they are. The standing repo itself is fetched, and
   fast-forwarded only when clean and on the default branch — a diverged tree is reported,
   never merged over.

2. **Write the verdict** to `.ddw-work/impact-<TICKET>.md`. For EVERY member the gather
   printed: impacted (with what part of the work hits it), or `Sin impacto: <reason>` — and the
   reason names the contract that stays intact, not a shrug. Walk `Consumed by` of everything
   the work touches: a consumer of a changing seam that is missing from the impacted list is
   the analysis failing at its one job.

3. **Validate it**:

   ```bash
   python3 .ddw/scripts/family_impact.py --validate .ddw-work/impact-<TICKET>.md
   ```

   Every member accounted for, no invented repos, reasons that exist. On PASS it writes the
   content-hashed receipt (`.ddw-sessions/impact-validated-…`) that the CLASSIFY→DEFINE gate
   demands. Editing the verdict afterwards kills the receipt — revalidate.

4. **Classify with the verdict in hand**: one impacted repo (this one) → an ordinary local
   ticket, normal pipeline. Multiple impacted repos → a multirepo initiative: the index in the
   workspace, per `define.instructions.md` § Multirepo split.

## The honest bargain

The receipt does not prove the judgment is right. It proves the judgment was made over the
WHOLE family, freshly read — and that skipping the step is a deliberate act that leaves no
file where the record demands one.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.