Skip to content
Back to skills

Solo Stream

ASecurity

Interactive decision-making wizard using STREAM 6-layer framework for founders facing high-stakes choices. Use when user says "help me decide", "should I do this", "evaluate decision", "STREAM analysis", "run decision framework", or "pros and cons". Do NOT use for idea validation with PRD (use /validate).

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 17, 2026
researchgoapi

Works with

  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill solo-stream --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Solo Stream?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Solo Stream
[![Security: A β€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-solo-stream/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-solo-stream)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: solo-stream
description: Interactive decision-making wizard using STREAM 6-layer framework for founders facing high-stakes choices. Use when user says "help me decide", "should I do this", "evaluate decision", "STREAM analysis", "run decision framework", or "pros and cons". Do NOT use for idea validation with PRD (use /validate).
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: fortunto2
  version: "1.4.1"
  openclaw:
    emoji: "🌊"
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Write, AskUserQuestion, mcp__solograph__kb_search
argument-hint: "[decision or dilemma to analyze]"
---

# /stream

Interactive wizard that walks any decision through the STREAM 6-layer framework. Designed for founders making high-stakes choices under uncertainty.

## Steps

1. **Parse the decision** from `$ARGUMENTS`. If empty, ask: "What decision or dilemma do you want to analyze?"

2. **Load framework context** (optional enhancement):
   - If MCP `kb_search` available: `kb_search(query="STREAM framework", n_results=3)` for full framework details.
   - Otherwise, the framework is embedded below.

3. **Walk through 6 layers interactively.** For each layer, explain the concept, ask a clarifying question via AskUserQuestion, then provide assessment.

### Layer 1 β€” Epistemological (Knowledge)
- Is this within your circle of competence?
- What assumptions are unproven?
- What would change your mind?
- **Ask:** "What do you know for certain about this space? What are you assuming?"

### Layer 2 β€” Temporal (Time)
- What's the time horizon for results?
- Is this Lindy-compliant (will it matter in 10 years)?
- Reversibility: can you undo this in 6 months?
- **Ask:** "What's your timeline? Is this a 3-month experiment or a 3-year commitment?"

### Layer 3 β€” Action (Minimum Viable)
- What's the smallest possible first step?
- What are second-order effects?
- Can you test this in a weekend?
- **Ask:** "What's the minimum viable version you could ship in 1-2 weeks?"

### Layer 4 β€” Stakes (Risk/Reward)
- Asymmetric upside? (small downside, large upside)
- Survivable worst case?
- Opportunity cost of NOT doing this?
- **Ask:** "What's the worst realistic outcome? Can you survive it financially and emotionally?"

### Layer 5 β€” Social (Network)
- Reputation impact on your network?
- Network effects or viral potential?
- Does this build social capital?
- **Ask:** "Who benefits besides you? Who might be hurt?"

### Layer 6 β€” Meta (Mortality Filter)
- Is this worth your finite time on earth?
- Does this align with your values?
- Will you regret NOT trying this?
- **Ask:** "If you had only 5 years left, would you still do this?"

4. **Synthesize verdict:**
   - Score each layer 1-10
   - Overall STREAM score (weighted average)
   - **GO** (score > 7) / **PAUSE** (5-7) / **NO-GO** (< 5)
   - Key risk to mitigate
   - Recommended first action

5. **Capture the decision** (optional): Offer to save the decision record. If user wants to save:
   - Write to `docs/decisions/` in the current project directory
   - Format: date + decision summary + verdict

6. **Output structured decision journal:**
   ```
   ## Decision: [topic]

   **Date:** [today]
   **Framework:** STREAM 6-layer

   ### Analysis Summary
   | Layer | Score | Key Finding |
   |-------|-------|-------------|
   | Epistemological | X/10 | ... |
   | Temporal | X/10 | ... |
   | Action | X/10 | ... |
   | Stakes | X/10 | ... |
   | Social | X/10 | ... |
   | Meta | X/10 | ... |

   **Overall STREAM Score: X/10 β€” GO/PAUSE/NO-GO**

   ### Recommendation
   [Clear recommendation with reasoning]

   ### Next Actions
   1. [action]
   2. [action]
   3. [action]
   ```

## Common Issues

### Questions feel too abstract
**Cause:** Decision not specific enough.
**Fix:** Start with a concrete decision statement: "Should I [action] given [context]?" not just "What should I do?"

### Score seems wrong
**Cause:** Layers weighted equally but some matter more for this decision.
**Fix:** The overall score is a starting point. Pay more attention to the layers most relevant to your situation (e.g., Stakes for financial decisions, Meta for life choices).

### Want to save the decision record
**Cause:** Running in a project without a `docs/decisions/` directory.
**Fix:** Skill saves to `docs/decisions/` in the current project. Create the directory if needed.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.