Skip to content
Back to skills

Sk Prompt Improver

ASecurity

Prompt engineering specialist that transforms vague requests into structured, scored AI prompts using 7 proven frameworks (RCAF, COSTAR, RACE, CIDI, TIDD-EC, CRISPE, CRAFT), DEPTH thinking methodology, and CLEAR scoring across text modes.

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
documentationpythongobashexpressdebuggingapidocumentation

Works with

  • api
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill sk-prompt-improver --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Sk Prompt Improver?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Sk Prompt Improver
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-sk-prompt-improver/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-sk-prompt-improver)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: sk-prompt-improver
description: "Prompt engineering specialist that transforms vague requests into structured, scored AI prompts using 7 proven frameworks (RCAF, COSTAR, RACE, CIDI, TIDD-EC, CRISPE, CRAFT), DEPTH thinking methodology, and CLEAR scoring across text modes."
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep]
version: 1.1.0.0
---

<!-- Keywords: prompt-engineering, prompt-improvement, DEPTH, RICCE, CLEAR-scoring, framework-selection, RCAF, COSTAR, CRAFT, TIDD-EC, CRISPE -->

# Prompt Engineering Specialist - Multi-Framework Enhancement with DEPTH Processing

Transforms vague or basic inputs into highly effective, structured AI prompts. Provides 7 text frameworks with automatic framework selection and CLEAR quality scoring.

**Core Principle**: Clarity, logic, expression, and reliability through structured methodology.

---

<!-- ANCHOR:when-to-use -->
## 1. WHEN TO USE

### Activation Triggers

**Use when**:
- Enhancing or improving an AI prompt for any purpose
- Evaluating prompt quality with CLEAR scoring
- Selecting the right prompt framework for a given task
- Transforming vague requests into structured, effective prompts

**Keyword Triggers**:
- `$improve`, `$text`, `$short`, `$refine`, `$json`, `$yaml`
- `$raw` (skip DEPTH, fast pass-through)
- "improve my prompt", "enhance this prompt", "prompt engineering"
- "create a prompt for", "optimize this prompt"

### Use Cases

#### Text Prompt Enhancement
Transform vague requests into structured prompts using RCAF, COSTAR, RACE, CIDI, TIDD-EC, CRISPE, or CRAFT frameworks with CLEAR scoring (40+/50 threshold).

### When NOT to Use

**Skip this skill when:**
- Writing code or debugging (use sk-code skills instead)
- Creating documentation (use sk-doc instead)
- Simple text editing without prompt structure needs
- Direct API calls that do not need prompt optimization

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:when-to-use -->
<!-- ANCHOR:smart-routing -->
## 2. SMART ROUTING

### Primary Detection Signal

Mode detection from command prefix or content keywords:

```bash
# Command prefix detection (highest priority)
[[ "$INPUT" == \$text* ]] && MODE="TEXT"
[[ "$INPUT" == \$improve* ]] && MODE="IMPROVE"
[[ "$INPUT" == \$refine* ]] && MODE="REFINE"
[[ "$INPUT" == \$short* ]] && MODE="SHORT"
[[ "$INPUT" == \$json* ]] && MODE="JSON"
[[ "$INPUT" == \$yaml* ]] && MODE="YAML"
[[ "$INPUT" == \$raw* ]] && MODE="RAW"
```

### Phase Detection

```text
USER REQUEST
    |
    +- STEP 0: Detect mode ($command or keyword signals)
    +- STEP 1: Score intents (top-2 when ambiguity is small)
    +- Phase 1: Framework Selection (8 frameworks evaluated)
    +- Phase 2: DEPTH Processing (3-10 rounds based on mode)
    +- Phase 3: Scoring & Validation (CLEAR)
    +- Phase 4: Output Delivery (formatted prompt)
```

### Resource Domains

The router discovers markdown resources recursively from `references/` and `assets/` and applies intent scoring.

```text
references/depth_framework.md     - DEPTH methodology, RICCE integration
references/patterns_evaluation.md - 10 frameworks, CLEAR scoring
references/interactive_mode.md    - Conversation flow, state management
references/format_guides.md       - Markdown/JSON/YAML format specs (consolidated)
assets/format_guide_markdown.md   - Markdown format deep-dive
assets/format_guide_json.md       - JSON format deep-dive
assets/format_guide_yaml.md       - YAML format deep-dive
```

### Resource Loading Levels

| Level | When to Load | Resources |
|-------|-------------|-----------|
| ALWAYS | Every invocation | SKILL.md (this file) |
| CONDITIONAL | If text/improve/refine mode | references/depth_framework.md, references/patterns_evaluation.md |
| CONDITIONAL | If interactive/ambiguous | references/interactive_mode.md |
| ON_DEMAND | If format specified | references/format_guides.md |

### Smart Router Pseudocode

```python
from pathlib import Path

SKILL_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent
RESOURCE_BASES = (SKILL_ROOT / "references",)
DEFAULT_RESOURCE = "references/depth_framework.md"

INTENT_MODEL = {
    "TEXT_ENHANCE": {"keywords": [("improve", 4), ("enhance", 4), ("prompt", 3), ("text", 3), ("refine", 4)]},
    "FRAMEWORK": {"keywords": [("framework", 4), ("rcaf", 5), ("costar", 5), ("tidd-ec", 5), ("scoring", 3)]},
    "FORMAT": {"keywords": [("json", 4), ("yaml", 4), ("markdown", 3), ("format", 3)]},
}

RESOURCE_MAP = {
    "TEXT_ENHANCE": ["references/depth_framework.md", "references/patterns_evaluation.md"],
    "FRAMEWORK": ["references/patterns_evaluation.md"],
    "FORMAT": ["references/format_guides.md"],
}

AMBIGUITY_DELTA = 1

def _guard_in_skill(relative_path: str) -> str:
    resolved = (SKILL_ROOT / relative_path).resolve()
    resolved.relative_to(SKILL_ROOT)
    if resolved.suffix.lower() != ".md":
        raise ValueError(f"Only markdown resources are routable: {relative_path}")
    return resolved.relative_to(SKILL_ROOT).as_posix()

def discover_markdown_resources() -> set[str]:
    docs = []
    for base in RESOURCE_BASES:
        if base.exists():
            docs.extend(path for path in base.rglob("*.md") if path.is_file())
    return {doc.relative_to(SKILL_ROOT).as_posix() for doc in docs}

def classify_intents(user_request):
    text = (user_request or "").lower()
    scores = {intent: 0 for intent in INTENT_MODEL}
    for intent, cfg in INTENT_MODEL.items():
        for keyword, weight in cfg["keywords"]:
            if keyword in text:
                scores[intent] += weight
    ranked = sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda pair: pair[1], reverse=True)
    primary, primary_score = ranked[0]
    if primary_score == 0:
        return ("TEXT_ENHANCE", None, scores)
    secondary, secondary_score = ranked[1]
    if secondary_score > 0 and (primary_score - secondary_score) <= AMBIGUITY_DELTA:
        return (primary, secondary, scores)
    return (primary, None, scores)

def route_prompt_improver_resources(user_request):
    inventory = discover_markdown_resources()
    primary, secondary, scores = classify_intents(user_request)
    intents = [primary] + ([secondary] if secondary else [])
    loaded = []
    seen = set()

    def load_if_available(relative_path: str):
        guarded = _guard_in_skill(relative_path)
        if guarded in inventory and guarded not in seen:
            load(guarded)
            loaded.append(guarded)
            seen.add(guarded)

    load_if_available(DEFAULT_RESOURCE)
    for intent in intents:
        for relative_path in RESOURCE_MAP.get(intent, []):
            load_if_available(relative_path)
    return {"intents": intents, "intent_scores": scores, "resources": loaded}
```

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:smart-routing -->
<!-- ANCHOR:how-it-works -->
## 3. HOW IT WORKS

### Enhancement Pipeline

Every prompt enhancement follows this pipeline:

```
STEP 1: Mode Detection
       ├─ Command prefix check ($text, $improve, $refine, $short, etc.)
       ├─ Keyword signal analysis (>=80% confidence = auto-route)
       └─ Ambiguous? Ask ONE comprehensive question
       ↓
STEP 2: Framework Selection
       ├─ Evaluate 8+ frameworks against request characteristics
       ├─ Score: complexity, urgency, audience, creativity, precision
       └─ Select primary framework + alternative
       ↓
STEP 3: DEPTH Processing (5-10 rounds)
       ├─ Discover: 5 perspectives, assumption audit, RICCE Role & Context
       ├─ Engineer: Framework application, RICCE Constraints & Instructions
       ├─ Prototype: Template build, RICCE validation
       ├─ Test: Scoring (CLEAR), quality gates
       └─ Harmonize: Final polish, RICCE completeness
       ↓
STEP 4: Scoring & Delivery
       ├─ Apply context-appropriate scoring system
       ├─ Verify threshold met (CLEAR 40+/50)
       └─ Deliver enhanced prompt with transparency report
```

See the Smart Routing pseudocode (Section 2) for the complete routing logic.

### Operating Modes

| Mode | Command | DEPTH Rounds | Scoring | Use Case |
|------|---------|-------------|---------|----------|
| Interactive | (default) | 10 | CLEAR | Guided enhancement |
| Text | `$text` | 10 | CLEAR | Standard text prompt |
| Short | `$short` | 3 | CLEAR | Quick refinement |
| Improve | `$improve` | 10 | CLEAR | Standard enhancement |
| Refine | `$refine` | 10 | CLEAR | Maximum optimization |
| JSON | `$json` | 10 | CLEAR | API-ready format |
| YAML | `$yaml` | 10 | CLEAR | Config format |
| Raw | `$raw` | 0 | None | Skip DEPTH |

### Framework Selection Matrix

| Complexity | Primary Need | Framework | Success Rate |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|
| 1-3 | Speed | RACE | 88% |
| 1-4 | Clarity | RCAF | 92% |
| 3-6 | Audience | COSTAR | 94% |
| 4-6 | Instructions | CIDI | 90% |
| 5-7 | Creativity | CRISPE | 87% |
| 6-8 | Precision | TIDD-EC | 93% |
| 7-10 | Comprehensive | CRAFT | 91% |
See [patterns_evaluation.md](./references/patterns_evaluation.md) for complete framework details.
See [depth_framework.md](./references/depth_framework.md) for the DEPTH methodology.

### Scoring Systems

**CLEAR** (50-point scale): Correctness (10) + Logic (10) + Expression (15) + Arrangement (10) + Reusability (5). Threshold: 40+.

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:how-it-works -->
<!-- ANCHOR:rules -->
## 4. RULES

### ✅ ALWAYS

1. **ALWAYS ask ONE comprehensive question** before processing
   - Gather: What needs enhancement? Use case/goal? Requirements?
   - Exception: `$raw` mode skips questions entirely

2. **ALWAYS apply DEPTH processing** for the detected mode
   - 10 rounds for text modes, 3 for $short, 0 for $raw

3. **ALWAYS enforce minimum 3 perspectives** during DEPTH Discover phase
   - Target 5 perspectives; 3 is the blocking minimum
   - Perspectives: Prompt Engineering, AI Interpretation, User Clarity, Framework Selection, Token Efficiency

4. **ALWAYS validate with RICCE** before delivery
   - Role, Instructions, Context, Constraints, Examples must be present or justified

5. **ALWAYS apply scoring** and verify threshold met
   - CLEAR 40+/50

6. **ALWAYS provide a transparency report** after delivering the enhanced prompt
   - Framework selected, DEPTH rounds applied, score breakdown, assumptions flagged

### ❌ NEVER

1. **NEVER answer own questions**
   - Wait for user response before proceeding with enhancement

2. **NEVER skip framework evaluation**
   - Even for simple prompts, score at least 3 frameworks before selecting

3. **NEVER deliver without scoring**
   - Every enhanced prompt must have a CLEAR score (except $raw)

4. **NEVER use second-person voice in enhanced prompts**
   - Use imperative or third-person form in the output

5. **NEVER exceed context with full reference loading**
   - Load only the references needed for the detected mode

### ⚠️ ESCALATE IF

1. **ESCALATE IF mode detection confidence < 50%**
   - Ask: "What type of prompt are you creating? Can you describe the use case?"

2. **ESCALATE IF CLEAR score below threshold after DEPTH**
   - Suggest: "Score is below target. Options: A) Additional refinement round B) Switch framework C) Accept as-is"

3. **ESCALATE IF request conflicts with prompt engineering scope**
   - Redirect: "This appears to be a [code/doc/debug] task. Consider using [sk-code/sk-doc] instead."

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:rules -->
<!-- ANCHOR:references -->
## 5. REFERENCES

### Core References

- [depth_framework.md](./references/depth_framework.md) - DEPTH methodology (Discover, Engineer, Prototype, Test, Harmonize), RICCE integration
- [patterns_evaluation.md](./references/patterns_evaluation.md) - 10 framework definitions, CLEAR scoring, design directions

### Mode-Specific References

- [interactive_mode.md](./references/interactive_mode.md) - Conversation flow, state management, smart routing

### Format References

- [format_guides.md](./references/format_guides.md) - Markdown, JSON, YAML format specifications and optimization (consolidated)

### Asset Files

- [format_guide_markdown.md](./assets/format_guide_markdown.md) - Markdown format deep-dive: fundamentals, delivery standards, RCAF/CRAFT structures, advanced patterns, validation, best practices
- [format_guide_json.md](./assets/format_guide_json.md) - JSON format deep-dive: fundamentals, data types, delivery standards, RCAF/CRAFT structures, advanced patterns, validation, best practices
- [format_guide_yaml.md](./assets/format_guide_yaml.md) - YAML format deep-dive: fundamentals, data types, delivery standards, RCAF/CRAFT structures, advanced patterns, templates, validation, best practices

### Reference Loading Notes

- Load only references needed for current intent
- Smart Routing (Section 2) is the single authority for loading rules
- SKILL.md (this file) is always loaded; conditionally load mode-specific references

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:references -->
<!-- ANCHOR:success-criteria -->
## 6. SUCCESS CRITERIA

### Enhancement Complete When

- ✅ Mode detected and framework selected with reasoning
- ✅ DEPTH rounds completed per mode specification
- ✅ Scoring applied and threshold verified
- ✅ RICCE validation passed
- ✅ Enhanced prompt delivered with transparency report
- ✅ User can iterate or accept

### Quality Targets

- **CLEAR Score**: 40+ out of 50
- **Framework Selection Accuracy**: Match task characteristics to framework with >85% alignment

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:success-criteria -->
<!-- ANCHOR:integration-points -->
## 7. INTEGRATION POINTS

### Framework Integration

This skill operates within the behavioral framework defined in AGENTS.md.

Key integrations:
- **Gate 2**: Skill routing via `skill_advisor.py` with prompt-related intent boosters
- **Tool Routing**: Per AGENTS.md Section 6 decision tree
- **Memory**: Context preserved via Spec Kit Memory MCP

### Related Skills

| Skill | Integration |
|-------|-------------|
| **sk-doc** | Documentation outputs from prompt engineering may use sk-doc for formatting |
| **sk-doc-visual** | Visual HTML outputs from prompt documentation may route to sk-doc-visual |
| **sk-code--web** | Prompts for web development contexts may co-invoke with sk-code--web |

### Tool Usage Guidelines

- **Read**: Load reference files from references/ directory
- **Write**: Output enhanced prompts to user-specified location
- **Glob**: Discover available reference files in skill directory
- **Bash**: Run validation scripts if needed

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:integration-points -->
<!-- ANCHOR:related-resources -->
## 8. RELATED RESOURCES

### Reference Files
- [depth_framework.md](./references/depth_framework.md) - DEPTH thinking methodology
- [patterns_evaluation.md](./references/patterns_evaluation.md) - Framework library and scoring

### Related Skills
- `sk-doc` - Documentation quality and component creation
- `sk-doc-visual` - Visual HTML outputs and interactive diagrams

---

<!-- /ANCHOR:related-resources -->

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.