Skip to content
Back to skills

Gh Pr

ASecurity

Create, update, and comment on GitHub pull requests with focus on material impact, safety, and human reviewability

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 31, 2026
testinggobashtestinggitapiperformance

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 31, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill gh-pr --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Gh Pr?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Gh Pr
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-gh-pr/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-gh-pr)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: gh-pr
description: Create, update, and comment on GitHub pull requests with focus on material impact, safety, and human reviewability
---

# GitHub PR Communication Skill

Use this skill for creating, updating, or commenting on GitHub pull requests. Focus on material impact, safe operations, and respecting busy reviewers.

## When to Use This Skill

- Creating PRs from feature branches
- Updating PR descriptions after significant changes
- Adding comments to communicate with reviewers
- Any PR communication task

## Announcement

Always announce at start:

```
"I'm using the gh-pr skill to <create|update|comment on> the pull request."
```

## Core Principles

1. **Safety first:** All PR bodies written to `.scratch/pr-bodies/` before use with `gh --body-file`
2. **Material impact:** Focus on why changes matter, not metrics or file counts
3. **Smart merge:** Detect manual edits, only update when changes are material
4. **Human-friendly:** Concise, warm tone; assume busy reviewer
5. **Flexible workflow:** Explicit commands when clear, smart routing when ambiguous

## File Structure

```
.scratch/pr-bodies/
  drafts/
    <slugified-title>.md          # Draft body before PR creation
  <pr-number>/
    metadata.json                  # PR metadata and state
    <timestamp>-body.md           # Timestamped snapshots of generated bodies
    <timestamp>-comment.md        # Comment drafts
```

### Metadata Schema

```json
{
  "pr_number": 123,
  "branch": "feature/add-skill",
  "base": "main",
  "title": "Add spotlight exclusion skill",
  "created_at": "2025-11-07T10:30:00Z",
  "last_generated_hash": "abc123def456",
  "last_updated_at": "2025-11-07T16:45:30Z",
  "manual_edits_detected": false
}
```

## Trigger Patterns

### Explicit Triggers (Always Honored)

- **"create a PR"** / **"open a PR"** → Create flow
- **"update the PR body/description"** → Update body flow
- **"comment on the PR"** / **"add a PR comment"** → Comment flow

### Ambiguous Triggers (Smart Routing)

**"update the PR":**

- No PR exists → Error: "No PR found for this branch. Did you mean to create one?"
- PR exists, no reviews → Update body
- PR exists, has reviews → Ask: "This PR has reviews. Update body or add comment?"

**"communicate the changes":**

- PR exists, no reviews yet → Update body
- PR exists, has reviews → Add comment (generates notifications)

## Operation Flows

### 1. Create PR

```
☐ Check if PR already exists
  - gh pr view --json number 2>/dev/null
  - If exists → error or route to update

☐ Gather information
  - Commits: git log <base>..HEAD
  - Check for PR template (.github/pull_request_template.md, etc.)
  - Check for CONTRIBUTING.md
  - Analyze commit messages and diffs

☐ Generate PR content
  - Title: from branch name or first commit (imperative mood, <72 chars)
  - Body:
    * Follow template structure if exists
    * Summary: 2-4 bullets of material impact
    * Test plan: if non-obvious
    * NO H1 heading (GitHub shows title separately)
    * NO metrics (# tests, # files, etc.)
    * Concise, warm tone

☐ Draft review
  - Write to .scratch/pr-bodies/drafts/<slug>.md
  - Show draft to user: "Here's the draft PR. Does this look good?"
  - Allow edits before creating

☐ Create PR
  - gh pr create --title "..." --body-file .scratch/pr-bodies/drafts/<slug>.md
  - Capture PR number from output

☐ Archive and track
  - mkdir -p .scratch/pr-bodies/<number>/
  - mv draft to <number>/<timestamp>-body.md
  - Write metadata.json with hash of generated body
  - rm .scratch/pr-bodies/drafts/<slug>.md
```

### 2. Update PR Body

```
☐ Verify PR exists
  - gh pr view --json number,body,title,state
  - Load metadata.json if exists
  - Check state (error if closed/merged unless user confirms)

☐ Detect manual edits
  - Hash current body: echo "$body" | shasum -a 256
  - Compare to last_generated_hash in metadata
  - If differs:
    * Compute diff: diff <(echo "$last_generated") <(echo "$current")
    * Analyze: whitespace-only vs content changes
    * If material: show diff, ask "Overwrite manual edits, merge, or cancel?"

☐ Check for material changes
  - Re-analyze full commit range: <base>..HEAD
  - Compare to previous analysis
  - If no material change:
    * "The current PR description is still accurate."
    * Skip update unless user forces

☐ Generate updated body
  - Follow same content guidelines as create
  - Re-analyze all commits in range

☐ Draft review
  - Write to .scratch/pr-bodies/<number>/<timestamp>-body.md
  - Show diff: current vs proposed
  - "Here's what would change. Look good?"

☐ Update PR
  - gh pr edit <number> --body-file <file>
  - Update metadata.json (hash, timestamp, manual_edits_detected)
```

### 3. Add PR Comment

```
☐ Verify PR exists
  - gh pr view --json number,title,reviews,comments
  - Check for review activity

☐ Determine comment content
  - Analyze recent commits since last update
  - Focus on: what changed and why
  - Common scenarios:
    * Responding to review feedback
    * Noting significant additions after initial review
    * Summarizing a batch of changes

☐ Draft comment
  - Write to .scratch/pr-bodies/<number>/<timestamp>-comment.md
  - Tone: conversational, helpful, concise (3-5 sentences)
  - Structure: "I've updated the PR to address..."
  - Show draft to user

☐ Post comment
  - gh pr comment <number> --body-file <file>
  - Optional: Update metadata.json with comment timestamp
```

## Decision Matrix: Update Body vs Comment

**Prefer UPDATE BODY when:**

- PR has no reviews/comments yet
- User explicitly says "update description/body"
- Material scope change that needs description rewrite

**Prefer COMMENT when:**

- PR has review activity (comments, requested changes)
- User mentions "responding to feedback"
- Batch of changes after initial review
- Want to notify watchers (comments generate notifications, body updates don't)

## Content Guidelines

### PR Title Format

- **Imperative mood:** "Add", "Fix", "Update", "Refactor"
- **Concise:** < 72 characters ideal
- **Capitalize** first word
- **No period** at end
- **Derive from:** Branch name (if semantic) or first commit message

### PR Body Structure

**When PR template exists:**

- Follow template structure exactly
- Fill sections based on commit analysis
- Preserve template comments/instructions

**When no template exists:**

```markdown
## Summary

- Material impact point 1
- Material impact point 2
- Material impact point 3 (if needed)

## Test plan

- How to verify the changes work
- Only if non-obvious or requires manual testing

[Optional sections based on context:]

## Breaking changes

## Migration notes

## Follow-up work
```

### Content Principles

**✅ DO:**

- Focus on material impact: "Enables pattern-based Spotlight exclusions for easier maintenance"
- Be concise yet warm: "This makes it easier to manage exclusions at scale."
- Explain why it matters, what problem it solves
- Include non-obvious testing steps

**❌ DON'T - Common Anti-Patterns:**

**Metrics (unless PR is specifically about them):**
- ❌ "Added 15 tests" → ✅ "Added test coverage for edge cases"
- ❌ "Modified 8 files across 3 modules" → ✅ Say nothing (diff shows this)
- ❌ "Reduced runtime from 2.5s to 1.2s" → ✅ Only if PR is about performance
- ❌ "Added 250 lines of code" → ✅ Never mention line counts
- ❌ "Test coverage increased to 85%" → ✅ Only if PR is about coverage

**Implementation details visible in diff:**
- ❌ "Created new `PatternExpander` class" → ✅ Say nothing (diff shows this)
- ❌ "Refactored into smaller functions" → ✅ Say nothing unless it's the PR's focus
- ❌ "Used async/await pattern" → ✅ Say nothing (implementation detail)
- ❌ "Added error handling" → ✅ Only if error handling is the PR's focus

**Over-explaining/verbose:**
- ❌ "This change significantly improves the developer experience by implementing a novel approach..."
- ✅ "Makes it easier to maintain exclusions at scale"
- ❌ "After careful consideration of multiple approaches, we decided to..."
- ✅ Just describe what it does and why it matters

**Other common mistakes:**
- ❌ Use H1 heading (GitHub shows title separately, causes duplication)
- ❌ List technologies used unless it's a new dependency worth noting
- ❌ Describe file structure changes unless it's an architectural shift
- ❌ Mention "following best practices" (assumed)
- ❌ Say "easy to" or "simple to" (condescending)

**The rule:** If a reviewer can see it in the diff or CI output, don't put it in the PR body unless it's the central focus of the PR.

### Following Repository Guidelines

**Search for PR templates:**

```
- .github/pull_request_template.md
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/*.md
```

**Search for CONTRIBUTING.md:**

```
- CONTRIBUTING.md
- .github/CONTRIBUTING.md
- docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
```

**If found:** Extract PR-related guidance (required info, checklists, style) and incorporate into body generation.

### Comment Content Guidelines

**Structure:**

```markdown
I've updated the PR to address the feedback:

- Point about what changed
- Another significant change
- Why these changes were made

[Optional: specific response to review comment if relevant]
```

**Tone:**

- Conversational but professional
- Acknowledge reviewers' input
- Explain reasoning when non-obvious
- Keep brief (3-5 sentences typical)

## Error Handling & Edge Cases

### Safety Checks

**Before creating PR:**

- ✓ Current branch is not main/master
- ✓ Branch has commits ahead of base
- ✓ gh CLI is installed and authenticated
- ✓ User has reviewed draft

**Before updating PR body:**

- ✓ PR exists and is open (warn if closed/merged)
- ✓ Manual edits check complete
- ✓ User has reviewed diff

**Before posting comment:**

- ✓ PR exists
- ✓ Comment is not empty
- ✓ User has reviewed content

### Common Errors

**No PR exists (when updating/commenting):**

```
Error: "No PR found for branch '<branch-name>'.
Would you like to create one?"

Action: Offer to route to create flow
```

**Multiple PRs for branch:**

```
1. gh pr list --head <branch> --state open
2. If exactly 1 open PR → use it
3. If 0 open PRs:
   - Check: gh pr list --head <branch> --state all
   - "No open PR found. Last PR was #123 (closed/merged)."
   - Offer to create new PR
4. If >1 open PR (rare):
   - "Found multiple open PRs: #123, #456. Which one?"
```

**Not on a branch / on main:**

```
Error: "Currently on '<branch>'.
PRs should be created from feature branches, not main/master."

Action: Stop, suggest creating a branch first
```

**gh CLI not available:**

```
Error: "GitHub CLI (gh) not found. Install with: brew install gh"
```

**gh not authenticated:**

```
Error: "GitHub CLI not authenticated. Run: gh auth login"
```

### Edge Cases

**Manual edits detected:**

```
1. Show diff: "The PR body has been manually edited. Here's what changed:"
2. Ask: "Overwrite manual edits, merge, or cancel?"
   - Overwrite: Replace with new generated body
   - Merge: Preserve manually-added sections
   - Cancel: Keep current body
```

**No material changes in update:**

```
"Analyzed commits - no material changes to scope or impact.
The current PR description is still accurate."

Action: Skip update unless user forces
```

**Draft in progress:**

```
"Found existing draft for '<title>'.
Use existing draft, create new, or cancel?"
```

**Scratch directory doesn't exist:**

```
mkdir -p .scratch/pr-bodies/drafts
```

## Change Detection Algorithm

```bash
# 1. Quick hash check
current_hash=$(gh pr view body -q .body < number > --json | shasum -a 256)
last_hash=$(jq -r .last_generated_hash .scratch/pr-bodies/ < number > /metadata.json)

# 2. If hashes match → no changes
if [ "$current_hash" = "$last_hash" ]; then
  echo "No manual edits detected"
  exit 0
fi

# 3. If hashes differ → compute diff
gh pr view body -q .body < number > --json > /tmp/current.md
cat .scratch/pr-bodies/ < number > / < last-timestamp > -body.md > /tmp/last.md
diff -u /tmp/last.md /tmp/current.md

# 4. Analyze diff
# - Whitespace only? → Not material
# - Content changes? → Material, set manual_edits_detected = true
```

## Integration with Other Skills

**working-in-scratch-areas:**

- All drafts go to `.scratch/pr-bodies/`
- Auto-creates directory structure

**git-preferences-and-practices:**

- Respects git workflow preferences
- Works with branch naming conventions

**Repository conventions:**

- Checks for ADRs and references them
- Links to docs/plans if design doc exists

## Example Workflows

### Creating a PR

```
User: "create a PR for this branch"

Claude: "I'm using the gh-pr skill to create the pull request."
[Analyzes commits: 5 commits adding spotlight exclusion patterns]
[Checks for templates: none found]
[Generates draft in .scratch/pr-bodies/drafts/add-spotlight-patterns.md]

Claude: "Here's the draft PR. The summary focuses on the pattern-based
approach and easier maintenance. Does this look good?"

[Shows draft content]

User: "yes"

Claude: [Creates PR #123]
"Created PR #123: Add spotlight exclusion patterns
https://github.com/user/repo/pull/123"
```

### Updating After Changes

```
User: "update the PR"

Claude: "I'm using the gh-pr skill to update the pull request."
[Checks PR #123]
[Hash check: no manual edits]
[Analyzes commits: 3 new commits adding monitoring tools]

Claude: "I've added 3 commits since the PR was created. The scope has
expanded to include monitoring tools. Should I update the description?"

User: "yes"

Claude: [Generates new body]
"Here's what would change in the description:

+ ## Monitoring
+ Includes live monitoring and activity analysis tools

Look good?"

User: "yes"

Claude: [Updates PR]
"Updated PR #123 description"
```

### Adding a Comment

```
User: "comment on the PR about the changes"

Claude: "I'm using the gh-pr skill to comment on the pull request."
[Checks PR #123: has 2 review comments]

Claude: "This PR has review comments. I'll add a comment about the
recent updates. Here's the draft:

---
I've updated the PR to address the feedback:
- Added input validation for pattern file paths
- Improved error messages for invalid patterns
- Updated tests to cover edge cases

The validation now catches malformed patterns before attempting expansion.
---

Look good?"

User: "yes"

Claude: [Posts comment]
"Added comment to PR #123"
```

## File Management

**Keep:**

- metadata.json (permanent record)
- Last 5 timestamped bodies/comments
- Current draft (if in progress)

**Clean up:**

- Completed drafts after PR creation
- Old timestamped files (optional: >30 days)

## Implementation Notes

**Hash algorithm:** Use `shasum -a 256` for consistency

**Timestamp format:** ISO 8601 with hyphens for filenames: `2025-11-07T10-30-00`

**Slugification:** Lowercase, hyphens, strip special chars: "Add Spotlight Skill" → "add-spotlight-skill"

**Base branch detection:**

```bash
# Try to detect from gh pr view first
base=$(gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName 2> /dev/null)

# Fall back to common defaults
if [ -z "$base" ]; then
  if git show-ref --verify --quiet refs/heads/main; then
    base="main"
  else
    base="master"
  fi
fi
```

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.