Skip to content
Back to skills

Empirical Validation

ASecurity

Requires proof before marking work complete — no "trust me, it works"

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
testingrustgoshellapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill empirical-validation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Empirical Validation?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Empirical Validation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-empirical-validation/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-empirical-validation)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: Empirical Validation
description: Requires proof before marking work complete — no "trust me, it works"
---

# Empirical Validation

## Core Principle

> **"The code looks correct" is NOT validation.**
> 
> Every change must be verified with empirical evidence before being marked complete.

## Validation Methods by Change Type

| Change Type | Required Validation | Tool |
|-------------|---------------------|------|
| **UI Changes** | Screenshot showing expected visual state | `browser_subagent` |
| **API Endpoints** | Command showing correct response | `run_command` |
| **Build/Config** | Successful build or test output | `run_command` |
| **Data Changes** | Query showing expected data state | `run_command` |
| **File Operations** | File listing or content verification | `run_command` |

## Validation Protocol

### Before Marking Any Task "Done"

1. **Identify Verification Criteria**
   - What should be true after this change?
   - How can that be observed?

2. **Execute Verification**
   - Run the appropriate command or action
   - Capture the output/evidence

3. **Document Evidence**
   - Add to `.agent/state/JOURNAL.md` under the task
   - Include actual output, not just "passed"

4. **Confirm Against Criteria**
   - Does evidence match expected outcome?
   - If not, task is NOT complete

## Examples

### API Endpoint Verification
```powershell
# Good: Actual test showing response
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/login -d '{"email":"test@test.com"}' 
# Output: {"success":true,"token":"..."}

# Bad: Just saying "endpoint works"
```

### UI Verification
```
# Good: Take screenshot with browser tool
- Navigate to /dashboard
- Capture screenshot
- Confirm: Header visible? Data loaded? Layout correct?

# Bad: "The component should render correctly"
```

### Build Verification
```powershell
# Good: Show build output
npm run build
# Output: Successfully compiled...

# Bad: "Build should work now"
```

## Forbidden Phrases

Never use these as justification for completion:
- "This should work"
- "The code looks correct"
- "I've made similar changes before"
- "Based on my understanding"
- "It follows the pattern"

## Integration

This skill integrates with:
- `/verify` — Primary workflow using this skill
- `/execute` — Must validate before marking tasks complete
- Rule 4 in `GEMINI.md` — Empirical Validation enforcement

## Failure Handling

If verification fails:

1. **Do NOT mark task complete**
2. **Document** the failure in `.agent/state/STATE.md`
3. **Create** fix task if cause is known
4. **Trigger** Context Health Monitor if 3+ failures

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.