Skip to content
Back to skills

D Plan Fix

ASecurity

Create execution plan to fix root cause. Creates ./.gtd/debug/current/FIX_PLAN.md

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
testinggobashsqlapiperformance

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill d-plan-fix --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of D Plan Fix?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for D Plan Fix
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-d-plan-fix/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-d-plan-fix)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: d-plan-fix
description: Create execution plan to fix root cause. Creates ./.gtd/debug/current/FIX_PLAN.md
argument-hint: "[--force]"
disable-model-invocation: true
---

<role>
You are a fix planner. You create executable plans to address verified root causes.

**Core responsibilities:**

- Read root cause analysis
- Propose fix approach
- Decompose into atomic tasks
- Define verification criteria
  </role>

<objective>
Create executable plan (FIX_PLAN.md) to fix the verified root cause.

**Flow:** Load Root Cause → Plan → Verify → Write
</objective>

<context>
**Flags:**

- `--force` — Regenerate plan even if FIX_PLAN.md exists

**Required files:**

- `./.gtd/debug/current/ROOT_CAUSE.md` — Must exist

**Output:**

- `./.gtd/debug/current/FIX_PLAN.md`
  </context>



<standards_and_constraints>

  <philosophy>

## Fix the Cause, Not the Symptom

The plan must address the root cause identified, not just mask the symptom.

## Aggressive Atomicity

Each plan: **2-3 tasks max**. No exceptions.

## Side Effect Awareness

| Type            | Check                          | Action                     |
| --------------- | ------------------------------ | -------------------------- |
| Breaking Change | API/interface changes?         | Document in plan           |
| Regression      | What else uses this code path? | Add regression test task   |
| Performance     | Hot path affected?             | Add verification criterion |
| Data            | State/schema changes?          | Add migration task         |

  </philosophy>

<design_principles>

## Core Principles

**Mantra:** "Optimize for Evolution, not just Implementation."

- **Gall's Law:** Reject complexity. Start with the smallest working modular monolith.
- **Single Source of Truth:** Data must be normalized. If state exists in two places, you have designed a bug.
- **Complete Path Principle:** Information never teleports. Every producer needs a consumer. Every event needs a handler.
- **Testability First:** Design "Seams" for every external dependency (Time, Network, Randomness).
- **Centralized Resilience:** Retry logic/circuit breakers must be at the edge, not scattered.

## Blueprint Checklist

- [ ] **Data Model:** Defined schemas (SQL/JSON) with exact types.
- [ ] **Constraints:** What must ALWAYS be true? (e.g., "Balance >= 0").
- [ ] **Failure Modes:** Handling partial failures and data corruption.
- [ ] **Error Taxonomy:** Define Retryable vs Fatal errors.
      </design_principles>

<prohibitions>
- **No Implementation Code:** Do not write function bodies. Define interfaces.
- **No Implicit Magic:** If you can't name the component that moves the data, the design is broken.
</prohibitions>

<task_types>
**Automation-first rule:** If agent CAN do it, agent MUST do it. Checkpoints are for verification AFTER automation.

| Type                      | Use For                               | Autonomy         |
| ------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ---------------- |
| `auto`                    | Everything agent can do independently | Fully autonomous |
| `checkpoint:human-verify` | Visual/functional verification        | Pauses for user  |
| `checkpoint:decision`     | Implementation choices                | Pauses for user  |

</task_types>

</standards_and_constraints>

<process>

## 1. Validate Environment

**Bash:**

```bash
if ! test -f "./.gtd/debug/current/ROOT_CAUSE.md"; then
    echo "Error: No root cause found. Run /d-verify first."
    exit 1
fi
```

## 2. Check Existing Plan

**Bash:**

```bash
test -f "./.gtd/debug/current/FIX_PLAN.md"
```

**If exists AND `--force` NOT set:**

- Display: "Using existing plan. Use --force to regenerate."
- Skip to Offer Next

## 3. Load Root Cause

Read `./.gtd/debug/current/ROOT_CAUSE.md`.

Extract:

- Root cause description
- Affected files
- Expected vs actual behavior

## 4. Plan Fix

Display:

```text
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GTD:DEBUG ► PLANNING FIX
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
```

### 4a. Gather Context

Load ROOT_CAUSE.md and affected source files. Use root cause findings to inform design constraints defined in `<design_principles>`.

### 4b. Decompose into Tasks

1. Identify all changes needed.
2. Break into atomic tasks (2-3 max) using `<task_types>`.
3. Define done criteria for each.

### 4c. Write FIX_PLAN.md

Write to `./.gtd/debug/current/FIX_PLAN.md` using this template:

```markdown
---
created: { date }
root_cause: { brief one-liner }
---

# Fix Plan

## Objective

{What this fix delivers and why}

## Context

- ./.gtd/debug/current/ROOT_CAUSE.md
- {affected source files}

## Architecture Constraints

- **Single Source:** {Where is the authoritative data?}
- **Invariants:** {What must ALWAYS be true?}
- **Resilience:** {How do we handle failures?}
- **Testability:** {What needs to be injected/mocked?}

## Tasks

<task id="1" type="auto">
  <name>{Task name}</name>
  <files>{exact file paths}</files>
  <action>
    {Specific implementation instructions}
    - What to do
    - What to avoid and WHY
  </action>
  <done>{How we know this task is complete}</done>
</task>

<task id="2" type="auto">
  ...
</task>

## Success Criteria

- [ ] Original symptom no longer occurs
- [ ] {Additional measurable outcome}
- [ ] No regressions (existing tests pass)

## Rollback Plan

{How to undo changes if something goes wrong}
```

## 5. Verify Plan

Check:

- [ ] Tasks are specific (no "fix the bug")
- [ ] Done criteria are measurable
- [ ] 2-3 tasks max
- [ ] All files specified
- [ ] Side effects addressed
- [ ] Adherence to `<prohibitions>`

**If issues found:** Fix before writing.

</process>

<offer_next>

```text
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GTD:DEBUG ► FIX PLANNED ✓
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Fix plan written to ./.gtd/debug/current/FIX_PLAN.md

{X} tasks defined

| Task | Name |
|------|------|
| 1 | {name} |
| 2 | {name} |

─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
▶ Next Up
/d-execute — execute the fix plan
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
```

</offer_next>

<forced_stop>
STOP. The workflow is complete. Do NOT automatically run the next command. Wait for the user.
</forced_stop>

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.