Skip to content
Back to skills

Brainstorm

ASecurity

Explore requirements before implementation. Separates WHAT from HOW to ensure the right problem is being solved before any code is written.

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
designgoperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill brainstorm --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Brainstorm?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Brainstorm
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-brainstorm/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-brainstorm)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: brainstorm
description: "Explore requirements before implementation. Separates WHAT from HOW to ensure the right problem is being solved before any code is written."
---

# /brainstorm

Explore requirements before implementation. Separates WHAT from HOW to ensure the right problem is being solved before any code is written.

## Usage

```
/brainstorm <topic>
```

## Arguments

- `topic`: The feature, problem, or idea to explore (e.g., "user notifications", "improve search performance")

## Constraints

**STRICT RULES — these are non-negotiable:**
- NO code generation
- NO implementation details
- NO technology choices
- NO architecture decisions
- Focus ONLY on requirements: what the user needs, not how to build it

## Instructions

When this skill is invoked:

### Agent Behavior

**Autonomy:**
- Drive the conversation with probing questions
- Synthesize answers into a focused requirements document
- Hand off cleanly to `/feature` when ready

**Discipline:**
- Ask ONE question at a time (max 5 questions total)
- Keep questions specific and grounded
- Stop exploring when requirements are clear enough to act on
- Aim for 200-300 word output document (not a novel)

### Process

#### Phase 0: Assess Need

Before starting, quickly determine if brainstorming is needed:

**Skip brainstorming if:**
- User already has a detailed PRD
- Requirements are crystal clear from the request
- It's a straightforward CRUD feature with no ambiguity

**If skipping:** Say "Requirements are clear — ready for `/feature {topic}`" and stop.

#### Phase 1: Discovery (Max 5 Questions)

Ask probing questions to understand the real need. Pick from these angles based on what's unclear:

**Core Need:**
- What problem does this solve for the user?
- What happens today without this feature?
- Who uses this and in what context?

**Scope & Boundaries:**
- What's the simplest version that delivers value?
- What's explicitly out of scope?
- Are there existing features this overlaps with?

**User Experience:**
- What does the user see/do when this works correctly?
- What should happen when things go wrong?
- Are there accessibility or performance expectations?

**Edge Cases:**
- What are the boundary conditions?
- What happens with no data? Maximum data?
- Are there concurrent usage concerns?

**Success Criteria:**
- How will we know this feature is working correctly?
- What metrics matter?
- What would make this feature a failure?

**Rules:**
- Ask ONE question at a time
- Wait for the answer before asking the next
- Adapt follow-up questions based on answers
- Stop early if requirements become clear (don't force all 5)

#### Phase 2: Synthesize Requirements

After gathering answers, produce a focused requirements document:

```markdown
## Requirements: {Topic}

### Must Have
- {Core requirement 1}
- {Core requirement 2}
- {Core requirement 3}

### Should Have
- {Important but not blocking}
- {Nice-to-have that adds clear value}

### Out of Scope
- {Explicitly excluded}
- {Future consideration, not now}

### Success Criteria
- {Measurable criterion 1}
- {Measurable criterion 2}

### Open Questions
- {Anything still unresolved}
```

**Guidelines:**
- 200-300 words maximum
- Use MoSCoW categories (Must/Should/Out of Scope)
- Be specific — "fast" is not a requirement, "responds in < 200ms" is
- Include success criteria that can be tested

#### Phase 3: Hand Off

Present the requirements document and offer next steps:

```
Requirements ready for: {topic}

Next steps:
1. `/feature {topic}` — Start full implementation lifecycle
2. `/feature {topic} --prd-only` — Create detailed PRD first
3. Refine — Ask me to adjust any requirements above
```

## Example

```
$ /brainstorm user notifications

Let me explore what you need before we start building.

What problem does this solve? Are users currently missing important
events, or is this about engagement/retention?

> Users miss important status changes on their orders

Got it — order status notifications. How should users receive these?
(e.g., in-app only, email, push, SMS?)

> In-app and email for now, push notifications later

What order status changes matter? All of them, or specific transitions?

> Shipped, delivered, and delayed — those are the ones customers ask about

---

## Requirements: User Notifications

### Must Have
- Notify users when order status changes to: shipped, delivered, delayed
- In-app notification center (unread count, mark as read)
- Email notifications for each status change
- User can view notification history

### Should Have
- User preferences to disable specific notification types
- Email templates with order details and tracking link

### Out of Scope
- Push notifications (future phase)
- SMS notifications
- Real-time WebSocket delivery (polling is acceptable for v1)

### Success Criteria
- Users receive in-app notification within 30 seconds of status change
- Email delivered within 5 minutes of status change
- Notification center loads in < 500ms

### Open Questions
- Should delayed notifications include estimated new delivery date?

---

Next steps:
1. `/feature user-notifications` — Start implementation
2. `/feature user-notifications --prd-only` — Create detailed PRD first
3. Refine — Adjust requirements above
```

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.