Diataxis — tutorials, how-to, reference, explanation types.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Dev-Toolbelt/dev-team-agents --skill diataxis-framework --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Diataxis Framework?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dev-toolbelt-diataxis-framework)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: diataxis-framework
description: Diataxis — tutorials, how-to, reference, explanation types.
---
# Diataxis Documentation Framework
## Four Document Types
| Type | Answers | Oriented to | Example |
|------|---------|-------------|---------|
| **Tutorial** | "Help me learn by doing" | Learning | "Build your first API in 10 minutes" |
| **How-to guide** | "Help me accomplish X" | Goals | "How to configure CORS" |
| **Reference** | "What is X? What does it do?" | Information | "API endpoint reference" |
| **Explanation** | "Why does it work this way?" | Understanding | "How the auth token lifecycle works" |
The most common mistake is mixing types in one document. Each document should belong to exactly one type.
## Tutorials
- Reader is a learner; guide them step by step
- Every step must work; never skip to an end state
- Use concrete, specific examples (not abstract placeholders)
- Goal: reader succeeds and understands what they just did
- Do not explain why (that is Explanation); just show what to do
## How-to Guides
- Reader has a specific goal; they know what they want but not how
- Start from a working system; do not re-explain prerequisites
- Use numbered steps for actions; use bullet lists only for options
- Title format: "How to X" or "X-ing with Y"
- Do not teach concepts (that is Tutorial); just solve the problem
## Reference
- Complete, accurate, consistent, non-opinionated
- Describe what it is, not how to use it
- Structure: input → output; parameters; types; constraints; examples
- Should be auto-generated where possible (JSDoc, docstrings, OpenAPI)
- Do not explain decisions (that is Explanation)
## Explanation
- Reader wants to understand, not to do
- Discuss trade-offs, history, alternatives, constraints
- Use the word "because" frequently
- Title format: "About X", "Understanding X", "Why X works this way"
- Do not give step-by-step instructions (that is Tutorial/How-to)
## Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | What it mixes | Fix |
|-------------|---------------|-----|
| "Getting started" that also explains internals | Tutorial + Explanation | Separate intro tutorial from architecture doc |
| README with installation, config reference, and rationale | How-to + Reference + Explanation | Split into three documents |
| API reference with opinionated usage advice | Reference + How-to | Move advice to a separate how-to guide |
| Tutorial that skips steps to reach a complex state | Tutorial + Reference | Show every step or link to a simpler prerequisite |
## Applying Diataxis
When reviewing or authoring docs:
1. Identify what the reader needs (learning, goal, information, or understanding)
2. Choose the corresponding document type
3. Verify the title matches the type (imperative verb → how-to; noun phrase → reference)
4. Check for anti-patterns: if it answers two different questions, split it
When a document is hard to write, it is usually because it is mixing types.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!