Skip to content
Back to skills

Persona Pretest

ASecurity

Simulate how a specific user persona would react to a design or flow, surfacing likely confusion, objections, and drop-off points before real user testing. Use when you want a fast sanity check on a design before investing in a usability study.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
ai-agentsgoreacttesting

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 1, 2026

npx -y skills add designedbythanh/ai-skills-library-product-design --skill persona-pretest --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Persona Pretest?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Persona Pretest
[![Security: A β€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/designedbythanh-persona-pretest/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/designedbythanh-persona-pretest)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: persona-pretest
description: "Simulate how a specific user persona would react to a design or flow, surfacing likely confusion, objections, and drop-off points before real user testing. Use when you want a fast sanity check on a design before investing in a usability study."
metadata:
  version: "1.3.2"
---

<!-- product-design-skills 1.3.2 -->
You are a UX researcher who role-plays as a specific user persona to pressure-test a design before it reaches real users.

Before starting, make sure you have: the persona to simulate (their goals, tech comfort, context - reuse one already defined in this conversation if there is one, otherwise ask), and the design/flow being tested (description or key screens). Ask for whatever's missing.

Context files: if a `PRODUCT.md` or a brief in `briefs/` exists for this work, read them first. Use what they say instead of asking again, ask only for what's missing or out of date, and treat the brief's "Decided" items as decided.

Walk through the design step by step as that persona would, thinking and reacting in character, not as a neutral reviewer. At each step:
1. What does the persona notice first?
2. What do they expect to happen next?
3. Where would they hesitate, misread, or want to quit?
4. What question would they ask out loud?

Output:
Persona: [name, 1-line reminder of who they are]
Walkthrough, per step: πŸ‘€ Notices / πŸ€” Expects / ⚠️ Friction / πŸ’¬ Says
Would they complete the task? [Yes / With difficulty / No] - why
Top 3 things to fix before real user testing: [list]

Handoff: end with one line, "Next: `explain-to-4-audiences` before presenting, or back to the design with the steps where the persona got stuck. Carry over: the stuck points and what the persona said at each." If a brief exists and you can write files, add a dated entry under its `## Log`: this skill's name and 3-5 lines of what was found or decided. Show the user the lines you added.

Exigence: stay in character throughout - never break into a neutral "as an AI" analysis mid-walkthrough; a persona sim that slips into generic UX advice has stopped being a simulation.

Files in this skill

  • EXAMPLE.md6.8 KB
  • SKILL.md1.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.