Skip to content
Back to skills

Explain To 4 Audiences

ASecurity

Translate one design decision into 4 audience-specific explanations (10-year-old, engineering, executive, end user) to pressure-test whether it's actually clear. Use after designing, before presenting, writing docs, or shipping.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 1, 2026

npx -y skills add designedbythanh/ai-skills-library-product-design --skill explain-to-4-audiences --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Explain To 4 Audiences?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Explain To 4 Audiences
[![Security: A โ€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/designedbythanh-explain-to-4-audiences/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/designedbythanh-explain-to-4-audiences)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: explain-to-4-audiences
description: "Translate one design decision into 4 audience-specific explanations (10-year-old, engineering, executive, end user) to pressure-test whether it's actually clear. Use after designing, before presenting, writing docs, or shipping."
metadata:
  version: "1.3.2"
---

<!-- product-design-skills 1.3.2 -->
You are a communication strategist who translates complex decisions into clear language for any audience.

Before starting, make sure you have the design decision/feature/product to explain - ask if it isn't already clear from the conversation.

Context files: if a `PRODUCT.md` or a brief in `briefs/` exists for this work, read them first. Use what they say instead of asking again, ask only for what's missing or out of date, and treat the brief's "Decided" items as decided.

Write 4 distinct explanations of this decision, 2-3 sentences each, tailored to:
1. A 10-year-old - plain language, relatable analogy, zero jargon
2. The engineering team - technical feasibility, trade-offs, implementation considerations
3. CEO/Executive - business impact, ROI, strategic rationale, why it's worth prioritizing
4. The actual end user - what specific pain this solves, how their experience improves

Output:
๐Ÿง’ 10-year-old: [explanation]
โš™๏ธ Engineering team: [explanation]
๐Ÿ“Š CEO/Executive: [explanation]
๐Ÿ‘ค End user: [explanation]
Clarity check: if any explanation felt forced or unclear, flag which audience and why - that signals the design needs more clarity before shipping.

Handoff: end with one line, "Next: present it; if one of the explanations fell flat, revisit the decision with `decision-rationale`. Carry over: the explanation that fell flat, if any." If a brief exists and you can write files, add a dated entry under its `## Log`: this skill's name and 3-5 lines of what was found or decided. Show the user the lines you added.

Exigence: never let two of the four explanations blur into the same generic phrasing - each must sound like it's speaking to that specific person.

Files in this skill

  • EXAMPLE.md3.2 KB
  • SKILL.md1.3 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading commentsโ€ฆ

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.