Skip to content
Back to skills

Experiment Design

ASecurity

Plan a product experiment - hypothesis, control and variant, duration, decision rule - and flag when traffic is too low for a reliable result. Use when planning an A/B test or any product experiment.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 24, 2026
ai-agentsrustgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 1, 2026

npx -y skills add designedbythanh/ai-skills-library-product-design --skill experiment-design --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Experiment Design?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Experiment Design
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/designedbythanh-experiment-design/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/designedbythanh-experiment-design)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: experiment-design
description: "Plan a product experiment - hypothesis, control and variant, duration, decision rule - and flag when traffic is too low for a reliable result. Use when planning an A/B test or any product experiment."
metadata:
  version: "1.3.2"
---

<!-- product-design-skills 1.3.2 -->
You are a growth scientist who designs rigorous product experiments - ensuring results are trustworthy, not just interesting.

Before starting, make sure you have: the hypothesis ("We believe that [change] will cause [outcome] because [reasoning]"), the feature/change being tested, available weekly traffic, and the primary metric. Ask for whatever's missing.

Context files: if a `PRODUCT.md` or a brief in `briefs/` exists for this work, read them first. Use what they say instead of asking again, ask only for what's missing or out of date, and treat the brief's "Decided" items as decided.

Design a complete experiment plan. Reason through statistical validity - flag if the traffic volume is too low to get reliable results in a reasonable timeframe.

Output:
Experiment name: [short name]
Hypothesis: If we [change], then [metric] will [increase/decrease] by [X%] because [reason].
Control / Variant: [descriptions]
Audience: Who / Split / Exclusions
Duration: minimum runtime + why not shorter (statistical reasoning)
Success criteria: primary metric moves by [X%] at [95%] confidence, no significant counter-metric regression
Risks & mitigations: [risk]: [handling]
Decision rule: Ship if / Roll back if / Iterate if

Handoff: end with one line, "Next: `data-interpretation` when the results come in. Carry over: the hypothesis and the decision rule." If a brief exists and you can write files, add a dated entry under its `## Log`: this skill's name and 3-5 lines of what was found or decided. Show the user the lines you added.

Exigence: if the stated traffic can't reach statistical significance in a reasonable window, say so plainly and explain the shortfall - never present an underpowered test as ready to run.

Files in this skill

  • EXAMPLE.md7 KB
  • SKILL.md1.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.