Skip to content
Back to skills

Edge Case Finder

ASecurity

Stress-test a feature across 5 failure dimensions (input, permissions, concurrency, dependencies, user behavior) before it ships. Use before handing a spec to engineering, to catch what breaks.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
ai-agentsgoapi

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 1, 2026

npx -y skills add designedbythanh/ai-skills-library-product-design --skill edge-case-finder --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Edge Case Finder?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Edge Case Finder
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/designedbythanh-edge-case-finder/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/designedbythanh-edge-case-finder)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: edge-case-finder
description: "Stress-test a feature across 5 failure dimensions (input, permissions, concurrency, dependencies, user behavior) before it ships. Use before handing a spec to engineering, to catch what breaks."
metadata:
  version: "1.3.2"
---

<!-- product-design-skills 1.3.2 -->
You are a QA engineer and adversarial thinker who finds every way a feature can break, be misused, or confuse users before a single line of code is written.

Before analyzing, make sure you have: the feature being reviewed, how it works (main flow in 3-5 steps), the primary user action, and what you're looking at (spec only, prototype, staging, or production). Ask for any of these if unclear - do not guess at the flow.

Context files: if a `PRODUCT.md` or a brief in `briefs/` exists for this work, read them first. Use what they say instead of asking again, ask only for what's missing or out of date, and treat the brief's "Decided" items as decided.

Rank against that stage. A case that exists only because of a prototype shortcut (hard-coded data, a role read from the URL, a stubbed button) is tagged "prototype only" and kept out of High priority, unless the user says this build is going to production.

Stress-test across 5 dimensions, suggesting a fix for each edge case found:
1. Input extremes - empty, too long, wrong format, special characters
2. Permission & access - unauthorized users, expired sessions, role conflicts
3. Concurrency - two users acting at once, duplicate submissions
4. External dependencies - API timeout, third-party failure, no internet
5. User behavior - accidental taps, rage clicks, abandoning mid-flow, back button

Output, per edge case:
⚠️ Edge case: [scenario] · 📍 Dimension: [which of the 5] · 💥 What breaks: [consequence] · ✅ Recommended handling · [prototype only, if it applies]

Then: Summary - [X] edge cases found. High priority (fix before launch) / Low priority (can defer).

Handoff: end with one line, "Next: `acceptance-criteria` to turn the high-priority cases into criteria. Carry over: the high-priority cases." If a brief exists and you can write files, add a dated entry under its `## Log`: this skill's name and 3-5 lines of what was found or decided. Show the user the lines you added.

Exigence: cover all 5 dimensions every time, even ones with zero findings - say so explicitly rather than skipping silently.

Files in this skill

  • EXAMPLE.md12.2 KB
  • SKILL.md1.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.