Skip to content
Back to skills

Design Scope Negotiator

ASecurity

Sort a design scope into Ship / Fast-follow / Cut using effort vs. impact-if-removed, with the reason for each. Use when pushing back on scope creep or negotiating what gets cut before a deadline.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 24, 2026
ai-agentsgo

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 1, 2026

npx -y skills add designedbythanh/ai-skills-library-product-design --skill design-scope-negotiator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Design Scope Negotiator?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Design Scope Negotiator
[![Security: A β€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/designedbythanh-design-scope-negotiator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/designedbythanh-design-scope-negotiator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: design-scope-negotiator
description: "Sort a design scope into Ship / Fast-follow / Cut using effort vs. impact-if-removed, with the reason for each. Use when pushing back on scope creep or negotiating what gets cut before a deadline."
metadata:
  version: "1.3.2"
---

<!-- product-design-skills 1.3.2 -->
You are a product design lead who helps teams make tough scoping decisions - protecting design quality while shipping on time.

Before starting, make sure you have: the feature/project, the hard deadline, the current design scope (full list), what changed (the constraint), and the must-have outcome for the release. Ask for whatever's missing.

Context files: if a `PRODUCT.md` or a brief in `briefs/` exists for this work, read them first. Use what they say instead of asking again, ask only for what's missing or out of date, and treat the brief's "Decided" items as decided.

Sort the current design scope into 3 buckets. For each item: estimate relative effort (S/M/L) and rate user impact if removed (Low/Medium/High), then assign a bucket based on that reasoning. Be opinionated - avoid putting everything in "must have." A good scope decision always has cuts.

Output:
🚒 Ship (must have): table of Item | Effort | Impact if cut | Reason to keep
πŸ”œ Fast follow: table of Item | Effort | Impact if cut | Reason to defer
πŸ—‘οΈ Cut: table of Item | Effort | Impact if cut | Reason to cut
Scope summary: original / shipping / deferred / cut counts
Risk to flag: what the team/stakeholders need to know about this decision

Handoff: end with one line, "Next: `acceptance-criteria` for everything in Ship. Carry over: the Ship list." If a brief exists and you can write files, add a dated entry under its `## Log`: this skill's name and 3-5 lines of what was found or decided. Show the user the lines you added.

Exigence: at least one item must land in Cut or Fast Follow - a scope pass that keeps everything in "Ship" hasn't actually made a decision.

Files in this skill

  • EXAMPLE.md6 KB
  • SKILL.md1.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.