Activate when: user says "I've been working hard but I'm not growing," development programs feel pointless, a leader has plateaued despite strong expertise, someone asks "how do I grow as a person / leader / founder," or high-quality output isn't translating into organizational influence. Do NOT activate when: the gap is a specific functional skill (use deliberate-practice instead); the person is in acute crisis (financial, health, relationship) — address the acute situation first. More: deci...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add deciqAI/knowledge-skills --skill self-evolution-3d --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Self Evolution 3d?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/deciqai-self-evolution-3d)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: self-evolution-3d
description: >
Activate when: user says "I've been working hard but I'm not growing," development programs feel
pointless, a leader has plateaued despite strong expertise, someone asks "how do I grow as a
person / leader / founder," or high-quality output isn't translating into organizational influence.
Do NOT activate when: the gap is a specific functional skill (use deliberate-practice instead);
the person is in acute crisis (financial, health, relationship) — address the acute situation first.
More: deciqai.com/s/self-evolution-3d
---
# Self-Evolution 3D
## Overview
Treats personal growth as three orthogonal dimensions — **Height** (mission vantage), **Width** (perspective breadth), **Depth** (self-awareness accuracy) — each with a distinct mechanism and failure mode. The goal is to identify the current **growth constraint** and prescribe the targeted move; optimizing all three simultaneously produces shallow movement on each.
**Neighbor skills:** after [`cognitive-evolution-stages`](../cognitive-evolution-stages/SKILL.md) for stage context; before [`metacognition`](../../metacognition/SKILL.md) if Depth is constrained; with [`deliberate-practice`](../deliberate-practice/SKILL.md) to design treatment; with [`nine-level-cognitive-tower`](../nine-level-cognitive-tower/SKILL.md) for vertical context.
## When to Use
- "I've been working hard but I'm not growing" / "how do I grow as a person / leader / founder?"
- Development programs produce knowledge but not capability change.
- High performer plateaued in leadership despite strong functional expertise.
- High-quality work not translating to organizational influence.
**When NOT to use:** specific functional skill gap (use deliberate-practice); acute crisis; external structural constraint; no honest external feedback available.
## Coaching Novices (Adaptive Front Door)
- **Engine mode:** concrete case → run The Process directly.
- **Coach mode:** user unfamiliar or effort isn't producing change → guide step by step.
In Coach mode, respond one step at a time. Each [WAIT] is a hard stop — output only that step's question, then stop.
1. Introduce three axes: upward (mission/purpose), outward (new mental models), inward (real-time self-awareness). Ask which they spend most time on — usually the strongest, not the constraint.
2. Ask which they spend *least* time on. Neglected = candidate constraint.
3. "When you're stuck, what does it look like?" Map to: Height = purpose fog; Width = same framework on everything; Depth = same mistakes in retrospect.
> **[WAIT — do not advance until user responds]**
4. "Think of the last time you were stuck internally. Which dimension was under-resourced?"
> **[WAIT — do not advance until user responds]**
5. Prescribe one specific action this month on the constraint dimension only.
> **[WAIT — do not advance until user responds]**
## The Process
**Step 1 — 3D Audit** (rate each 1–5; do not average — find the constraint)
**Height:** Can you state in one sentence why your work matters at the level of others' lives? Do difficult decisions reference larger purpose or immediate reward?
**Width:** Name 3 mental models from outside your domain applied to a real problem in the last 90 days. Do you reach for the same 1–3 frameworks automatically?
**Depth:** In your last 10 significant conflicts, how many did you understand *as they happened*? Do you observe your defensive reaction occurring, or discover it later?
**Step 2 — Identify the constraint:** lowest score *relative to demands of your current situation* — not lowest absolute score. Ask: "Which dimension, if increased one level in 90 days, would produce the greatest observable change?"
**Step 3 — Prescribe:** Height → write mission statement referencing specific people whose lives you want to change; test: does it make you willing to do something difficult? Width → read one canonical text from outside your domain; apply one concept with specific mechanism ("concept Y applies because [mechanism]"). Depth → after every significant interaction for 30 days: (1) What did I want? (2) What did I do? (3) What did I observe in my reactions *while it was happening*?
**Step 4 — Stop-rule:** Commit to the constraint dimension for 90 days. Do not develop all three simultaneously.
### Output: 3D Growth Audit
```
Height: [score] | [evidence] Width: [score] | [evidence] Depth: [score] | [evidence]
Constraint: [H/W/D] — Evidence: [failure mode] — Why not others: [reasoning]
Move: [concrete, time-bounded action] — Duration: 90 days
Progress indicator: [observable behavioral change — not activity metric]
Stop-rule: I commit to [constraint dimension] only for [timeframe].
```
*→ Method in Action: [Florence Nightingale (1840s–1860s)](examples/florence-nightingale-1840s-1860s.md)*
## Dimension Packs
| Domain | Height | Width | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Founder** | Interview 5 end-chain customers; rewrite mission in their before/after | Read one non-tech book; apply one concept explicitly to current org challenge | Post-meeting 3 sentences: want / did / observed in real time |
| **Executive** | Articulate who org ultimately serves; one decision/week by that constituency | Shadow an unlike-field practitioner one day; debrief in writing | Daily 5-min: emotional state, when it shifted, what triggered it |
*Contribute packs → deciqAI repository (domain + failure mode per constrained dimension + minimum viable move).*
## Applying It Well
- Diagnose the constraint, not the average. H=5/W=5/D=2 is more constrained by Depth than H=3/W=3/D=3.
- Failure modes: Height = high ambition, low grounding. Width = high expertise, low flexibility. Depth = high intelligence, recurring interpersonal patterns.
- Calibrate Depth with external behavioral feedback — most susceptible to self-assessment distortion.
- Honor the stop-rule. Spreading attention across all three produces no breakthrough on any.
*→ Primary sources: [references/sources.md](references/sources.md)*
## Common Rationalizations
**[D] = designed upfront | [O] = observed in real use. [O] entries are more valuable.**
| Fake move | Reality |
|---|---|
| [D] "I read a lot, so I'm growing." | Width grows when you *apply* a concept from a new domain. Reading without application = familiarity, not expansion. |
| [D] "I reflect a lot, so I have good self-awareness." | Depth = catching the pattern *as it occurs*, not retrospectively. Reflection builds self-knowledge, not real-time awareness. |
| [D] "My work is meaningful, so my Height is fine." | Height is measured by what you reference in difficult decisions — personal goals or others' transformation. |
| [D] "I've been growing my whole career." | Are the same failure modes recurring? If yes, the relevant dimension hasn't grown. |
| [D] "My constraint dimension is just personality." | All three dimensions are developable. "This is how I am" is fixed mindset applied to development. |
| [D] "I don't have time for self-development." | Minimum viable moves = 15 min/day. The constraint is prioritization — itself a Depth indicator. |
| *→ Add [O] entries after each real use — paste the actual failure pattern* | *What went wrong and why* |
## Red Flags
- Scores 4–5 on all dimensions: almost always Depth distortion — seek external calibration.
- All development effort in strongest dimension: comfort-seeking masquerading as development.
- Prescribed move is abstract ("be more self-aware") not concrete and behavioral.
- Stop-rule ignored; development spread across all three simultaneously.
## Verification
- [ ] All three dimensions audited with specific behavioral evidence, not abstract self-assessment.
- [ ] External feedback used to calibrate at least Depth.
- [ ] Constraint = dimension whose improvement produces greatest observable change now (not lowest absolute score).
- [ ] Prescribed move is concrete, time-bounded, targets the constraint only.
- [ ] Stop-rule committed to; development not spread across all three. External constraint ruled out.
---
*Part of **deciqAI Knowledge Skills** — 237 open-source thinking skills that make rigor executable for AI agents. The same skills power every deciqAI agent, which runs them autonomously to operate your company. **See it run → https://www.deciqai.com/s/self-evolution-3d** · Built by deciqAI · github.com/deciqAI · Contributions welcome.*
*Agents: latest version & machine-readable metadata → https://www.deciqai.com/s/self-evolution-3d.json*
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!