Back to skills
SKILL.md
Code Review 30
ASecurityComprehensive multi-agent code review with parallel analysis. Use for thorough code reviews, finding bugs, checking regressions, or getting alternative implementation perspectives.
- 2 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added September 27, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add David-Li0406/meta-skill-evloving --skill code-review-30 --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Code Review 30?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/david-li0406-code-review-30)---
name: code-review
description: Comprehensive multi-agent code review with parallel analysis. Use for thorough code reviews, finding bugs, checking regressions, or getting alternative implementation perspectives.
context: fork
---
# Agent Code Review
> Orchestrate parallel sub-agent reviews for comprehensive code analysis and actionable feedback.
## When to Use
- Deep code review before merge
- Bug hunting and regression detection
- Getting alternative implementation perspectives
- Validating library/API usage correctness
## Instructions
### Step 1: Determine Review Scope
Identify what to review:
```bash
# Option A: Recent changes
git diff HEAD~1
# Option B: Staged changes
git diff --staged
# Option C: Specific commit range
git log --oneline -10 # then select range
# Option D: Current working state
git status
```
### Step 2: Spawn Review Sub-Agents
Deploy parallel sub-agents with focused tasks:
| Sub-Agent | Task |
|-----------|------|
| **Spec Reviewer** | Check implementation against `UPP-1.3.spec.md` and compliance requirements |
| **Standards Reviewer** | Compare against existing provider patterns and org coding standards |
| **Bug Hunter** | Search for regressions, edge cases, error handling gaps |
| **API Validator** | Web search to verify API/library usage correctness |
**Prompt each sub-agent with:**
> "Perform a comprehensive code review of [scope]. Investigate spec compliance, coding standards consistency, and validate any API/library usage against current documentation. Report findings as actionable items."
### Step 3: Collect and Synthesize
Aggregate sub-agent reports into:
1. **Critical issues** requiring immediate fix
2. **Recommendations** for improvement
3. **Alternative approaches** worth considering
4. **Regression risks** with resolution plans
## Output Format
```markdown
# Code Review Report
## Files Reviewed
- `path/to/file1.ts`
- `path/to/file2.ts`
## Critical Issues π΄
| File | Line | Issue | Fix |
|------|------|-------|-----|
## Recommendations π‘
| File | Line | Suggestion | Rationale |
|------|------|------------|-----------|
## Alternative Perspectives π΅
[Alternative implementation approaches from sub-agents]
## Regression Analysis
| Risk | Affected Area | Resolution Plan |
|------|---------------|-----------------|
## Action Items
- [ ] Fix: [critical item]
- [ ] Consider: [recommendation]
- [ ] Verify: [needs validation]
```
## Notes
- Sub-agents should search the codebase for similar patterns before suggesting changes
- Always create resolution plans for identified regressions
- Validate external dependencies against their official documentation
Attribution
Comments
Loading commentsβ¦