Fresh verification gate before claiming done, fixed, passing, ready, or before commit/PR. Evidence before claims, always.
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install datit309/supergraph---
name: verify
description: Fresh verification gate before claiming done, fixed, passing, ready, or before commit/PR. Evidence before claims, always.
mcp: codebase-memory-mcp
---
# /supergraph:verify
Requires healthy `index_status` for `CBM_PROJECT` (see `references/codebase-memory-contract.md`); then `codebase-memory-mcp` `detect_changes`, `trace_path`, recipes `cycles/hubs/bridges/test-gaps`. Block on degraded/new cycle/unapproved hub/missing tests.
Fresh verification gate before completion claims.
**Iron Law:** `NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE`
## When to Use
Before saying/implying: done, fixed, passing, clean, ready, complete, works, verified, successful.
Also: before marking `Status: completed`, committing, PR'ing, accepting agent reports, moving to next phase.
## Usage
`/supergraph:verify` | `tests` | `lint` | `build` | `plan auth-login task 2` | `claim "login fixed"`
## Evidence Mapping
| Claim | Required fresh evidence |
|---|---|
| Tests pass | `$TEST_CMD` exits 0, zero failures |
| Lint clean | `$LINT_CMD` exits 0, zero errors |
| Build succeeds | `$BUILD_CMD` exits 0 |
| Bug fixed | Original failing symptom/test now passes |
| Regression covered | RED failed before fix, GREEN passes after |
| TDD complete | RED failure valid, GREEN passes, refactor verified |
| Task completed | Acceptance criteria met + verification commands pass |
| Agent completed | Diff inspected + independent tests/lint |
| Review passed | Reviewer + graph review + tests/lint pass |
| Ready to merge | Tests + lint + build + review PASS |
## Steps
### 0. Announce
"✅ /supergraph:verify — verifying [claim] with fresh evidence..."
### 1. Identify Claim
Map claim to required proofs from evidence mapping.
### 2. Select Plan Context (if applicable)
0 plans → skip | 1 → use | >1 → ask | `plan <slug>` → match.
### 3. Get Commands
Read from plan `## Environment Context` or `.supergraph-env` (set by `/supergraph:scan`). Missing → STOP, run scan first.
No command can prove claim → STOP: "Required check is unknown."
### 3b. Serena sweep (optional): See `serena/SKILL.md:Setup` — `get_diagnostics_for_file` per touched file; STOP on type errors before test suite. Skip if `SERENA_ACTIVE=false` or unavailable.
### 4. Run Fresh Verification (NOW — no reuse of old output unless freshness guard passes)
For agent output: `git diff --stat && git diff --name-only`.
Then run relevant tests/lint/build locally.
**Freshness guard (dedup suite, preserves Iron Law):** Reuse of immediately prior evidence is allowed **only if** `HEAD_SHA` unchanged and `git diff --name-only HEAD` unchanged and last `PASS` timestamp `<120s` ago (same commit). Otherwise **must rerun** ` $TEST_CMD`/`$LINT_CMD` fresh NOW. Guard respects `CBM_INDEXED_AT` TTL from `/supergraph:scan` but never skips verification before merge/PR — if `HEAD_SHA` changed, reuse is invalid.
### 5. Read Output
Check: exit code, failure count, error count, warnings. Don't confuse lint ≠ build, targeted ≠ suite.
### 6. Report Evidence
**Pass:**
```markdown
## Verification Evidence
- Claim: [claim] | Command: `[command]` → exit 0 → PASS
- Evidence: [output summary] | Timestamp: [now]
```
**Fail:**
```markdown
## Verification Failed
- Claim: [claim] | Command: `[command]` → exit [N] → FAIL
- Failure: [summary] | Next: /supergraph:fix
```
Cannot verify → say so explicitly. No completion language.
### 7. Update Plan Status
Only after evidence passes: `in_progress` → `completed`.
If failed → keep status or mark `stuck` if retries exhausted.
**For user-facing confirmation:** Announce task/plan completion in the user's language.
If plan context exists, show: "Task N completed — [user-facing summary]"
### 8. Report
```
✅ /supergraph:verify complete
- Claim: [claim] | Evidence: [command] → PASS|FAIL
- Next: [recommendation]
```
## Anti-Patterns — Block These
- "should work" / "seems fixed" / "probably passes" / "looks good"
- Trusting agent reports without independent check
- Stale command output | No acceptance criteria check
- Commit/PR without fresh tests+lint+build+review evidence
- Hiding skipped checks behind positive wording
## Evidence Rules
Evidence before claims, always. Fresh only — old runs don't count.
Read output before reporting. No positive language without proof.
Agent output requires independent verification.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!