Back to skills
SKILL.md
Verify
ASecurityFresh verification gate before claiming done, fixed, passing, ready, or before commit/PR. Evidence before claims, always.
- 22 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 2 views
- Added August 31, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add datit309/supergraph --skill verify --agent claude-codeAre you the author of Verify?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/datit309-verify)---
name: verify
description: Fresh verification gate before claiming done, fixed, passing, ready, or before commit/PR. Evidence before claims, always.
mcp: codebase-memory-mcp
---
# /supergraph:verify
Requires healthy `index_status` for `CBM_PROJECT` (see `references/codebase-memory-contract.md`); then `codebase-memory-mcp` `detect_changes`, `trace_path`, recipes `cycles/hubs/bridges/test-gaps`. Block on degraded/new cycle/unapproved hub/missing tests.
Fresh verification gate before completion claims.
**Iron Law:** `NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE`
## When to Use
Before saying/implying: done, fixed, passing, clean, ready, complete, works, verified, successful.
Also: before marking `Status: completed`, committing, PR'ing, accepting agent reports, moving to next phase.
## Usage
`/supergraph:verify` | `tests` | `lint` | `build` | `plan auth-login task 2` | `claim "login fixed"`
## Evidence Mapping
| Claim | Required fresh evidence |
|---|---|
| Tests pass | `$TEST_CMD` exits 0, zero failures |
| Lint clean | `$LINT_CMD` exits 0, zero errors |
| Build succeeds | `$BUILD_CMD` exits 0 |
| Bug fixed | Original failing symptom/test now passes |
| Regression covered | RED failed before fix, GREEN passes after |
| TDD complete | RED failure valid, GREEN passes, refactor verified |
| Task completed | Acceptance criteria met + verification commands pass |
| Agent completed | Diff inspected + independent tests/lint |
| Review passed | Reviewer + graph review + tests/lint pass |
| Ready to merge | Tests + lint + build + review PASS |
## Steps
### 0. Announce
"✅ /supergraph:verify — verifying [claim] with fresh evidence..."
### 1. Identify Claim
Map claim to required proofs from evidence mapping.
### 2. Select Plan Context (if applicable)
0 plans → skip | 1 → use | >1 → ask | `plan <slug>` → match.
### 3. Get Commands
Read from plan `## Environment Context` or `.supergraph-env` (set by `/supergraph:scan`). Missing → STOP, run scan first.
No command can prove claim → STOP: "Required check is unknown."
### 3b. Serena sweep (optional): See `serena/SKILL.md:Setup` — `get_diagnostics_for_file` per touched file; STOP on type errors before test suite. Skip if `SERENA_ACTIVE=false` or unavailable.
### 4. Run Fresh Verification (NOW — no reuse of old output unless freshness guard passes)
For agent output: `git diff --stat && git diff --name-only`.
Then run relevant tests/lint/build locally.
**Freshness guard (dedup suite, preserves Iron Law):** Reuse of immediately prior evidence is allowed **only if** `HEAD_SHA` unchanged and `git diff --name-only HEAD` unchanged and last `PASS` timestamp `<120s` ago (same commit). Otherwise **must rerun** ` $TEST_CMD`/`$LINT_CMD` fresh NOW. Guard respects `CBM_INDEXED_AT` TTL from `/supergraph:scan` but never skips verification before merge/PR — if `HEAD_SHA` changed, reuse is invalid.
### 5. Read Output
Check: exit code, failure count, error count, warnings. Don't confuse lint ≠ build, targeted ≠ suite.
### 6. Report Evidence
**Pass:**
```markdown
## Verification Evidence
- Claim: [claim] | Command: `[command]` → exit 0 → PASS
- Evidence: [output summary] | Timestamp: [now]
```
**Fail:**
```markdown
## Verification Failed
- Claim: [claim] | Command: `[command]` → exit [N] → FAIL
- Failure: [summary] | Next: /supergraph:fix
```
Cannot verify → say so explicitly. No completion language.
### 7. Update Plan Status
Only after evidence passes: `in_progress` → `completed`.
If failed → keep status or mark `stuck` if retries exhausted.
**For user-facing confirmation:** Announce task/plan completion in the user's language.
If plan context exists, show: "Task N completed — [user-facing summary]"
### 8. Report
```
✅ /supergraph:verify complete
- Claim: [claim] | Evidence: [command] → PASS|FAIL
- Next: [recommendation]
```
## Anti-Patterns — Block These
- "should work" / "seems fixed" / "probably passes" / "looks good"
- Trusting agent reports without independent check
- Stale command output | No acceptance criteria check
- Commit/PR without fresh tests+lint+build+review evidence
- Hiding skipped checks behind positive wording
## Evidence Rules
Evidence before claims, always. Fresh only — old runs don't count.
Read output before reporting. No positive language without proof.
Agent output requires independent verification.
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.