Skip to content
Back to skills

Ls Wf Pr Review Feedback Fixes

ASecurity

Use when turning pull request feedback into fixes, tests, and follow-up review.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
ai-agentscode-reviewgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add CruxExperts/LocalSetup --skill ls-wf-pr-review-feedback-fixes --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ls Wf Pr Review Feedback Fixes?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ls Wf Pr Review Feedback Fixes
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/cruxexperts-ls-wf-pr-review-feedback-fixes/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cruxexperts-ls-wf-pr-review-feedback-fixes)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ls-wf-pr-review-feedback-fixes
description: Use when turning pull request feedback into fixes, tests, and follow-up review.
metadata:
  version: "1.0"
---

Use this pipeline package for structured PR feedback loops.
Follow the owning skills in sequence:

1. [ls-receiving-code-review](../../skills/ls-receiving-code-review/SKILL.md)
   for technical triage and verification of actionable feedback.
2. [ls-test-driven-development](../../skills/ls-test-driven-development/SKILL.md) for implementing accepted
   fixes with test evidence.
3. [ls-github-pr-review](../../skills/ls-github-pr-review/SKILL.md) for follow-up review
   only when materially changed risky code or a resolved substantial finding
   warrants another independent look.

These skills own the procedures; this package composes their phases.

Consume Copilot comments alongside human and other automated feedback. Bind each
review and accepted finding to the reviewed PR head SHA; confirm the current head
before acting. Recheck stale findings against the current diff rather than
assuming they still apply. Deduplicate the same defect across reviewers and
deterministic checks, retaining one actionable finding and its source references.
Send accepted fixes to the existing repository agents, not a cloud coding agent.

Do not request another review for unchanged code or routinely run both Lite and
Balanced review. A Copilot outage or exhausted allowance is advisory: continue
existing repository-agent review and deterministic validation without enabling a
paid fallback, disabling checks, or treating missing review as validation proof.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md1.6 KB
  • workflow.yaml1.7 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.