Checklist-driven security review pass for pull requests.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add crewship-ai/crewship --skill security-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Security Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/crewship-ai-security-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: security-review
description: Checklist-driven security review pass for pull requests.
license: MIT
---
# Security Review
When asked to review a pull request, walk through the following
checklist and report findings inline:
1. **Input validation** — any user-controlled input that reaches a
shell, SQL query, file path, or URL must be either escaped or
parameterised. Flag any concatenation.
2. **AuthN/AuthZ** — every new endpoint must consult the same auth
middleware as its peers. Routes registered without a guard are
defects.
3. **Secrets in code** — flag any string that looks like an API key,
token, or certificate. Suggest moving to the credentials vault.
4. **Dependency pins** — flag bumps that widen version ranges or
downgrade transitive deps.
5. **Logging** — assert that credentials, PII, and full request
bodies are NOT logged. Flag any `log` / `console.log` of headers,
query params, or environment dumps.
Output format: a bulleted list grouped by severity (HIGH / MEDIUM /
LOW). For each finding include the file + line range and a one-line
suggested fix.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.