Gate report — what the tool-level gates actually did, and which rules nothing has tripped.
Scanned 10/1/2026
npx -y skills add crewforth/crewforth --skill crew-gates --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Crew Gates?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/crewforth-crew-gates)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: crew-gates
description: Gate report — what the tool-level gates actually did, and which rules nothing has tripped.
argument-hint: "[--log <path>]"
disable-model-invocation: true
metadata:
kind: command
---
Run the report with the Bash tool, not PowerShell, and read it back to the user. The report is a file-install tool:
a plugin install carries no `eval/` commands (only `eval/lib`), by design — there, say so plainly and stop.
```bash
bash .claude/eval/gate-report.sh $ARGUMENTS
```
Then interpret it in two sentences, in the user's language:
- **Exit 3 (no log).** Say plainly that gate activity is *not measured* — not that the gates never fired. Offer
the one-line opt-in the report prints. Do not present the rule count as if it were evidence of anything.
- **Exit 0.** Lead with the verdict split (how often the gates asked vs blocked). Then the notable rules: a rule
firing repeatedly is worth a conversation ("something keeps reaching for this"), and the not-observed list is
a prompt to check whether a rule *can* still match, not a delete list. `smoke-test` is what proves a rule can
fire; this only shows what tripped it.
Never infer that a gate works because it appears in the report, or that it is broken because it does not.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!