Skip to content
Back to skills

Offer Policy Checker

ASecurity

Validates a proposed commission/offer/outbound action against policy: within the tier's commission cap, all-in take-rate under the gate, product ACTIVATE, anti-spam params present — returning pass / warn / block + fixes. Use when setting, changing, or negotiating commission, deciding whether to accept a creator's counter-offer, or running a pre-launch compliance check; also called by outreach-message-composer and reply-triage. Affiliate (分销) context. Chinese triggers: 设置佣金 / 接受反价 / 发起前合规检查.

  • 8 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 24, 2026
ai-agentsgodatabase

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 24, 2026

npx -y skills add crevideo/crevideo-reach --skill offer-policy-checker --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Offer Policy Checker?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Offer Policy Checker
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/crevideo-offer-policy-checker/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/crevideo-offer-policy-checker)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: offer-policy-checker
description: >-
  Validates a proposed commission/offer/outbound action against policy: within the
  tier's commission cap, all-in take-rate under the gate, product ACTIVATE, anti-spam
  params present — returning pass / warn / block + fixes. Use when setting, changing,
  or negotiating commission, deciding whether to accept a creator's counter-offer, or
  running a pre-launch compliance check; also called by outreach-message-composer and
  reply-triage. Affiliate (分销) context.
  Chinese triggers: 设置佣金 / 接受反价 / 发起前合规检查.
---

# Offer Policy Checker · 报价与合规校验

**Role**: a pass/warn/block **checker**, not a policy database. It judges whether an offer/outbound crosses a line and gives fixes. **Does not set tier** (creator-tier-resolver), **does not write copy**.

## Output language
Write every output in the **merchant's working language**, using that market's native seller terminology:
- **US Local sellers → English**: tier / all-in take-rate / outreach waterfall / Target Collaboration / DM / sample …
- **China POP sellers → 中文**: 分级 / 真实抽成 / 触达阶梯 / 定向邀约 / 私信 / 寄样 …
Tool names stay identical in both languages. If unsure which market, ask once before producing output.

## When to use / not use
- Use: validate a proposed commission, a creator counter-offer, a batch flat commission; the pre-send "does this fit policy?" check.
- Don't use: tier not yet decided (run creator-tier-resolver first).

## Inputs
1. Proposed commission/offer + the creator's tier (Open/T1/T2/T3).
2. Scenario: first offer / counter-offer / batch.
3. Optional: product (to check ACTIVATE), intended channel + anti-spam params.

## Steps (in order)
1. **Tier commission-cap check** (numbers from the Cheat Sheet): within range → pass; over default but under cap → warn (needs explicit human confirm); over cap → reject (must lower the price or re-judge the tier).
2. **All-in take-rate gate**: estimate all-in take-rate using **the Cheat Sheet's exact formula — do not reconstruct it from memory**. (Shape per the Doctrine: platform commission% + effective creator commission [listed ÷ (1 − return rate)] + per-order fulfillment ÷ AOV; landed cost/duty, samples, sales tax, and return-handling costs are **NOT** in it.) Write N/A for any missing item, do not fabricate. Over the Cheat Sheet's all-in take-rate ceiling → mark "needs intervention" (suggest lower commission / raise AOV·bundle / different product / lower-cost channel); **never pass on "high GMV".**
3. **Eligibility check**: product must be ACTIVATE; in batch, **every** creator in the pool must pass (else split the pool).
4. **Anti-spam param check** (outbound): confirm stop_on_reply / skip_creators_with_prior_replies / skip_messaged_within_days per the Cheat Sheet, plus the cross-channel cooldown. Flag any missing.
5. Output the verdict + fixes (do not decide acceptance of a counter-offer for the user).

## Sibling skills
- Tier undecided → creator-tier-resolver.
- After it passes, draft copy → outreach-message-composer.

## ⛔ Do NOT
- Never pass an offer over the tier cap or over the all-in take-rate ceiling (even "a competitor pays more / special case") — raise the tier or change the Cheat Sheet first.
- Never auto-accept a creator counter-offer — give the verdict only, wait for a human.
- Never apply a high tier's cap to a data-insufficient creator — treat conservatively.
- Never judge a batch on an "average tier".

## 📌 Strategy dependency (anti-staleness)
This skill embeds **no** commission caps, all-in take-rate **formula or** thresholds, anti-spam defaults, or tool list — all come from the Action Workspace Doctrine → Key-Rules Cheat Sheet; if an example here conflicts with current policy, the Cheat Sheet wins. Only call tools that actually exist.

## Output format
Render the report in the merchant's working language; the template below shows the structure.
```
✅ Pass | tier T2 | proposal in range | all-in take-rate est ≤ ceiling | product ACTIVATE | anti-spam params present
⚠️ Warn | over default, under cap +X% | needs your explicit "over-default" confirm | all-in take-rate est = …
❌ Reject | over tier cap +X% or all-in take-rate est > ceiling
  Options: (1) lower into range [recommended] (2) if evidence supports a higher tier → re-judge tier (3) change the Cheat Sheet (strategic, needs the lead)
(missing) an all-in take-rate item = N/A → recommend more data; anti-spam params missing → recommend adding skip_messaged_within_days etc.
```

## Example
Input: a T2 creator, proposed commission above that tier's default. Output:
⚠️ **Warn** — over default, under cap (exact cap in the Cheat Sheet), needs your explicit "over-default" confirm; all-in take-rate est passes the gate, product ACTIVATE, anti-spam params present. Options: (1) lower to within default [recommended] (2) if evidence supports a higher tier → re-judge tier. Won't decide for you.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.