Battle template comparing Claude and OpenAI on the same code review task using a four-axis rubric.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
Skills Directorynpx -y skills add conectlens/lenserfight --skill claude-vs-openai-pr-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Claude Vs Openai Pr Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/conectlens-claude-vs-openai-pr-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: claude-vs-openai-pr-review
description: Battle template comparing Claude and OpenAI on the same code review task using a four-axis rubric.
---
# Claude vs OpenAI — Pull Request Review
A reusable battle template that takes the `code-reviewer` lens, hands it to both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-4o on the same diff, and lets voters score the outputs against the Code Quality Rubric.
## Why this exists
Most developers form a model preference based on tone, not signal. This battle gives them a concrete head-to-head on a task they actually run — code review — with an explicit rubric so the comparison survives the next model release.
## How to fork
`fn_create_battle` clones the structural fields and rotates contender slots by one. Forking is intended:
- Change the rubric for a stricter house standard.
- Swap one contender for a local Ollama model.
- Change the input diff to your team's repo.
## Forkability check
Forking is enforced by:
- [`fn_battles_create_rematch`](../../../supabase/schema.sql) — clones a terminal-state battle into a new draft with `parent_battle_id` set.
- `parent_battle_id` on `battles.battles` — preserves lineage so a fork tree is queryable.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Recovers prior coding-agent session context by running `catchup <agent> --since-compact`, which extracts a clean summary of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, OpenCode, or Pi Agent session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", or asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.
