Audit AI-powered features, API calls, agent workflows, prompt chains, tool calls, embeddings, vector search, retries, caching, and model selection to detect token waste and inefficient patterns. Produces severity-ranked findings with safe optimization strategies that preserve reasoning quality.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add conectlens/lenserfight --skill ai-cost-manager-reducer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ai Cost Manager Reducer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/conectlens-ai-cost-manager-reducer-lenserfight)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ai-cost-manager-reducer
description: Audit AI-powered features, API calls, agent workflows, prompt chains, tool calls, embeddings, vector search, retries, caching, and model selection to detect token waste and inefficient patterns. Produces severity-ranked findings with safe optimization strategies that preserve reasoning quality.
---
# AI Cost Manager & Reducer
Audit `[[scope]]` as an efficiency engineer. Use `[[context]]` when provided.
Every finding must name a concrete waste pattern, its cost risk, and a safe optimization strategy that preserves reasoning quality and chain correctness.
**Never recommend removing a reasoning step unless you verify it is truly redundant or its output is unused downstream.**
---
## Step 1 — Map the AI Call Graph
For each AI call site in scope, record:
```
File → function → purpose → model → avg input tokens → avg output tokens → call frequency → cached?
```
Flag any call where: frequency × token-cost > threshold, or model tier doesn't match task complexity.
---
## Step 2 — Apply Waste Pattern Catalogue
### Token Waste
| ID | Pattern | Signal |
|----|---------|--------|
| TW-1 | Oversized system prompt on every call | System prompt > 500 tokens with mostly static content |
| TW-2 | Full history resent without truncation | Context grows unboundedly per session |
| TW-3 | Redundant context injection | Same DB rows / user profile fetched and embedded on every request |
| TW-4 | Verbose output without `max_tokens` cap | Responses regularly exceed task requirements |
| TW-5 | Unstructured output where JSON would halve tokens | Free-text response parsed by regex downstream |
| TW-6 | Recursive summarization without memoization | Same document re-summarized on every call |
### Repeated / Duplicate Calls
| ID | Pattern | Signal |
|----|---------|--------|
| RC-1 | Identical prompt sent multiple times per request | No cache; same query triggers 2+ completions |
| RC-2 | Duplicate embedding generation | Same text embedded on insert and query with no stored cache |
| RC-3 | Classification called once per item in a loop | Per-row intent/sentiment when batch classification is available |
| RC-4 | Agent re-reads same tool output | Tool result not stored in agent state |
| RC-5 | Background job re-processes unchanged records | No `updated_at` / version gate before AI call |
### Model Overuse
| ID | Pattern | Signal |
|----|---------|--------|
| MO-1 | Opus/GPT-4 used for simple classification or formatting | Task needs < 200 tokens and has deterministic answer |
| MO-2 | Expensive model in high-frequency cron | Cron calls Opus/GPT-4 every minute on potentially unchanged data |
| MO-3 | No model routing between tiers | Same model regardless of task complexity |
| MO-4 | Embedding model overqualified for the retrieval task | Ada-3 on short lookups where text-embedding-3-small suffices |
### Retry & Loop Storms
| ID | Pattern | Signal |
|----|---------|--------|
| RL-1 | Unbounded agent loop | `while (true)` or recursive agent with no step cap |
| RL-2 | Retry on every error including non-retryable (400s) | Retry wrapper doesn't skip validation errors |
| RL-3 | Retry storm on quota hit without jitter | Simultaneous retries after 429 with no backoff spread |
| RL-4 | Tool call in loop without early exit | Agent calls search repeatedly even after finding answer |
### Caching Gaps
| ID | Pattern | Signal |
|----|---------|--------|
| CG-1 | No prompt-level cache | Identical prompts hit the API on every call |
| CG-2 | No embedding cache | pgvector rows recalculated instead of reused |
| CG-3 | No semantic cache | Similar prompts bypass cache |
| CG-4 | Short or missing TTL on AI responses | Cache evicts results before they can be reused |
| CG-5 | Streaming response not cached | Streamed output never stored; replays cost full tokens |
### Chain Inefficiency
| ID | Pattern | Signal |
|----|---------|--------|
| CI-1 | Sequential calls that could be parallelized | Step B doesn't need step A's output but waits for it |
| CI-2 | Multi-step chain where one call could replace two | Classify then reformat is one structured-output call |
| CI-3 | Intermediate results discarded and regenerated | Summarization result thrown away; re-run next request |
| CI-4 | Unnecessary tool calls | Agent calls `search` when result is already in context |
---
## Output Format
Each finding:
```
ID: <waste-pattern-id>
Severity: critical | high | medium | low
Affected: <file:line or function or workflow>
Current cost risk: <frequency × token-cost at scale, e.g. "1,000 battles/day × 4,000 tokens = $X/day">
Failure / explosion scenario: <what breaks or costs explode under load>
Optimization strategy: <model swap, caching, dedup, batching, prompt compression, etc.>
Preserves reasoning: yes / no + explanation
Validation steps:
1. <unit test or integration check>
2. <metric to observe before/after>
3. <rollback condition>
```
Order by severity. Group by call site when multiple findings share a file.
---
## Constraints
- Do not recommend removing a reasoning step unless its output is unused or redundant.
- Do not recommend switching models without verifying the cheaper model produces equivalent quality.
- Do not recommend aggressive caching for calls where staleness breaks product correctness.
- Mark every recommendation with "Preserves reasoning: yes/no".
- If a call site cannot be safely optimized, say so and explain the constraint.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!