Guide users from a rough product idea to a complete, standardized PRD with minimal user input. Use when a user needs Codex to construct a detailed PRD, auto-assign increment metadata, and auto-split child epics mapped to functional requirements and acceptance criteria for downstream Jira planning.
Scanned 5/30/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install ComeOnOliver/skillshub---
name: prd-increment-writer
description: Guide users from a rough product idea to a complete, standardized PRD with minimal user input. Use when a user needs Codex to construct a detailed PRD, auto-assign increment metadata, and auto-split child epics mapped to functional requirements and acceptance criteria for downstream Jira planning.
---
# PRD Increment Writer
Build a complete PRD through guided discovery, then generate delivery metadata for increment and child epics.
## Operating model
- Keep user input minimal: ask for problem/context first.
- Ask follow-up questions only when ambiguity blocks meaningful requirement or epic assignment.
- Use concise question batches (5-8 questions max per round).
- After each round, ask: `Move to the next step?`
## Mandatory workflow
1. Discovery intake
- Capture initial product idea/problem statement from user.
- Capture business context, target user, and core pain point.
- Capture organizational context needed for planning risk:
- Required partner teams (for example Design, Engineering, Data, Security, Legal, GTM, Support)
- Known external dependencies (vendors, platforms, APIs, compliance gates)
- Dependency constraints (lead times, approvals, sequencing constraints)
- Prompt for `fix_version` (target release date/version). Do not infer release horizon.
2. Structured PRD build
- Generate all standard sections:
- PRD snapshot
- Objective/problem statement
- User needs/motivations
- Success criteria and KPIs
- Use cases and edge cases
- User/job stories
- Scope (in/out)
- Functional requirements (FR IDs)
- Acceptance criteria (AC IDs)
- Non-functional requirements
- Dependencies, risks, mitigations
- Assumptions and open questions
- Consolidated summary and quality rubric
3. Increment metadata assignment (Codex-owned)
- Auto-assign increment metadata from PRD scope and dependency depth.
- Do not ask user to assign increment or epics.
- Infer increment as the experience represented by the PRD.
- Generate:
- `increment_id` (slug-style, derived from PRD name)
- `increment_name` (experience-oriented, derived from PRD name)
- `fix_version` (user-provided)
- `scope_size` (S/M/L/XL)
- `dependency_depth` (Low/Medium/High)
- `xfn_dependencies` (array of internal cross-functional dependencies)
- `external_dependencies` (array of external dependencies)
- `confidence_score` (0.00-1.00)
- `review_required` (true when confidence < 0.70)
4. Child epic decomposition (Codex-owned)
- Auto-split child epics from user flows and abilities within the experience.
- Cluster FRs/ACs into coherent workstreams (for example UX flow, platform, integrations, reporting).
- Output 3-7 child epics by default.
- For each epic generate:
- `epic_id` (slug-style)
- `epic_name`
- `rationale`
- `workstream_type` (UX Flow / Platform / Integration / Data / Reporting / Governance)
- `mapped_fr_ids` (array)
- `mapped_ac_ids` (array)
- `dependency_order` (integer sequence)
- `xfn_dependencies` (array)
- `external_dependencies` (array)
- `priority` (P0/P1/P2)
- `confidence_score` (0.00-1.00)
- `review_required` (true when confidence < 0.70)
5. Traceability and readiness checks
- Ensure every FR and AC maps to at least one child epic.
- Flag unmapped FR/AC as `coverage_gap`.
- Provide a readiness summary with blockers and decisions needed.
## Output format
Return output using this exact order.
### 1) PRD Narrative
- Full PRD in standardized section structure with FR/AC IDs.
### 2) Increment Metadata
- Human-readable summary of assigned increment metadata.
### 3) Child Epic Plan
- Human-readable list of 3-7 child epics with mapping and dependency order.
### 4) Dependency Register
- Explicit table of external and XFN dependencies across increment and epics.
- Include: dependency name, type (`XFN` or `External`), owner team, blocking status, lead time risk, and impacted epic IDs.
### 5) Jira Mapping JSON
Provide a single JSON block with this schema:
```json
{
"increment": {
"increment_id": "string",
"increment_name": "string",
"fix_version": "string",
"scope_size": "S|M|L|XL",
"dependency_depth": "Low|Medium|High",
"xfn_dependencies": [
{
"name": "string",
"owner_team": "string",
"status": "Planned|At Risk|Blocked",
"lead_time_risk": "Low|Medium|High",
"notes": "string"
}
],
"external_dependencies": [
{
"name": "string",
"owner": "string",
"status": "Planned|At Risk|Blocked",
"lead_time_risk": "Low|Medium|High",
"notes": "string"
}
],
"confidence_score": 0.0,
"review_required": false
},
"epics": [
{
"epic_id": "string",
"epic_name": "string",
"rationale": "string",
"workstream_type": "UX Flow|Platform|Integration|Data|Reporting|Governance",
"mapped_fr_ids": ["FR-1"],
"mapped_ac_ids": ["AC-1"],
"dependency_order": 1,
"xfn_dependencies": [],
"external_dependencies": [],
"priority": "P0|P1|P2",
"confidence_score": 0.0,
"review_required": false
}
],
"coverage": {
"unmapped_fr_ids": [],
"unmapped_ac_ids": [],
"coverage_gap": false
}
}
```
## Rules
- Never ask the user to propose increment or epic names.
- Never infer `fix_version`; always request it explicitly.
- Always call out external and XFN dependencies, even when inferred with low confidence.
- Use explicit assumptions when details are missing.
- If information is too sparse, produce a best-effort draft and clearly mark low-confidence fields.
- Preserve domain terminology from user context.
- Keep decomposition actionable for Jira import/mapping.
## Quality bar
Before finalizing:
- Confirm all required PRD sections are present.
- Confirm 3-7 epics are produced unless explicitly justified.
- Confirm FR/AC traceability is complete or flagged.
- Confirm increment/epic confidence and review flags are included.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!