Structured implementation planning for multi-step development tasks. Use when you have a spec or requirements and need to break work into executable steps.
Scanned 2/10/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CodingCossack/agent-skills-library --skill writing-plans --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Writing Plans?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/codingcossack-writing-plans)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: writing-plans
description: Structured implementation planning for multi-step development tasks. Use when you have a spec or requirements and need to break work into executable steps.
---
# Writing Plans
## Overview
Create implementation plans for an engineer with zero codebase context.
Each plan includes:
- Exact file paths for every operation
- Complete code (not "add validation here")
- Test-first approach with verification commands
- Bite-sized steps (2-5 min each)
Principles: DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using the `writing-plans` skill to create the implementation plan."
**Context:** Run in dedicated worktree. If none exists, use `using-git-worktrees` skill first.
**Save plans to:** `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md`
## Before Writing
1. Read spec/requirements completely
2. Explore project structure (`view .`)
3. Identify tech stack (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.)
4. Note existing patterns in similar files
5. Check docs/ for existing conventions
## Bite-Sized Task Granularity
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes), independently verifiable:
- "Write the failing test" — step
- "Run it to confirm failure" — step
- "Implement minimal code to pass" — step
- "Run tests to confirm pass" — step
- "Commit" — step
## Plan Document Header
Every plan MUST start with this header:
~~~markdown
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
~~~
## Task Structure
~~~markdown
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
```
**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
```python
def function(input):
return expected
```
**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS
**Step 5: Commit**
```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```
~~~
## Before Handoff
Verify plan completeness:
- Every file path exists or will be created
- Every command can be run exactly as written
- No TODO/placeholder text remains
- Tests cover all acceptance criteria from spec
- Include exact test code, not descriptions
## Execution Handoff
After saving plan, present:
**"Plan saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Choose execution mode:**
1. **Subagent-Driven** — same session, fresh subagent per task, fast iteration
2. **Parallel Session** — new session, batched execution with checkpoints
**Which approach?"**
### If Subagent-Driven chosen
- Stay in this session
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** `subagent-driven-development`
- Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review
### If Parallel Session chosen
- Guide user to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses `executing-plans`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!