Skip to content
Back to skills

Verification Before Completion

ASecurity

Verification discipline for completion claims. Use when about to assert success, claim a fix is complete, report tests passing, or before commits and PRs. Enforces evidence-first workflow.

  • 19 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added February 7, 2026
data-airust

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add CodingCossack/agent-skills-library --skill verification-before-completion --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Verification Before Completion?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Verification Before Completion
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/codingcossack-verification-before-completion/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/codingcossack-verification-before-completion)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: verification-before-completion
description: Verification discipline for completion claims. Use when about to assert success, claim a fix is complete, report tests passing, or before commits and PRs. Enforces evidence-first workflow.
---

# Verification Before Completion

> **NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE**

## Core Protocol

Evidence before claims, always. If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

```
BEFORE any completion claim:
1. IDENTIFY: What verification command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - NO → State actual status with evidence
   - YES → State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
```

### Command Selection

When multiple verification options exist (mono-repo, multiple suites):
- Run the **most specific** command that covers the changed code
- When uncertain, run the **broadest** command (full test suite > single file)
- Lint ≠ build ≠ test — each verifies different claims

### Evidence Format

```
✅ Ran: npm test
   Exit: 0
   Result: 47 passed, 0 failed
   "All tests pass."

❌ "Tests should pass now" (no command output)
```

## Verification Requirements by Claim Type

| Claim | Required Evidence | Insufficient |
|-------|-------------------|--------------|
| Tests pass | Test output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build exit code: 0 | Linter passing |
| Bug fixed | Original symptom test passes | Code changed |
| Regression test | Red-green cycle verified | Single green |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent "success" report |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |

## Red Flags — STOP

- Words: "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Satisfaction before verification: "Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!"
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Partial verification
- **ANY wording implying success without verification output**

## Rationalization Prevention

| Excuse | Response |
|--------|----------|
| "Should work now" | Run the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ build |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "Partial check enough" | Partial proves nothing |

## Key Patterns

**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test] → [See: 34/34 pass] → "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now"
```

**Regression (TDD):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "Wrote regression test" (no red-green)
```

**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Checklist each item → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```

**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.